Started By
Message

re: USA World Cup 2010 predictions

Posted on 10/16/09 at 12:32 am to
Posted by ezride25
Constitutional Republic
Member since Nov 2008
24457 posts
Posted on 10/16/09 at 12:32 am to
My roomates and I would sleep in the living room so we didn't have far to move to catch the early games in 2002. That sucked. How much of a time difference is SA?
Posted by S
RIP Wayde
Member since Jan 2007
156117 posts
Posted on 10/16/09 at 12:34 am to
not sure. i think ~6 hrs? wasnt too bad. 2pm games at the confederations cup were probably 7 or 8 local time over there.
Posted by thenry712
Zasullia, Ukraine
Member since Nov 2008
15795 posts
Posted on 10/16/09 at 12:35 am to
7 hours from CT. Basically only an hour earlier than most EPL matches.
Posted by S
RIP Wayde
Member since Jan 2007
156117 posts
Posted on 10/16/09 at 12:35 am to
i was close
Posted by BraveTiger225
Atlanta, GA
Member since May 2008
17662 posts
Posted on 10/16/09 at 12:36 am to
South Africa should be seven hours ahead for the World Cup since they don't observe daylight savings (as far as I can tell). So they'll be eight ahead once we fall back, but seven for next summer.
Posted by ezride25
Constitutional Republic
Member since Nov 2008
24457 posts
Posted on 10/16/09 at 12:37 am to
quote:

So they'll be eight ahead once we fall back, but seven for next summer.


I have always had trouble with this. Fall back spring forward analogies do nothing but confuse me further.
Posted by BraveTiger225
Atlanta, GA
Member since May 2008
17662 posts
Posted on 10/16/09 at 12:39 am to
Then, we'll just go with seven. That's all that matters for next summer. It's the same time difference that we are used to for UEFA Champions League. Since South Africa doesn't do daylight-saving, their time is = to Central Europe Time during the summer.
Posted by SloeGinFizz
The District
Member since Sep 2009
213 posts
Posted on 10/16/09 at 9:46 am to
quote:

USA World Cup 2010 predictions



I think we get out of the group stage. Any victory following that would be a nice surprise. We're still minnows compared to Germany, Italy, Spain, England, Netherlands, etc.
Posted by Tigersfan
Member since Feb 2006
2644 posts
Posted on 10/16/09 at 9:50 am to
quote:

Signed,

LHSAA State MVP 1995


Who was the MVP that year? You? I played back then.
Posted by Freauxzen
Utah
Member since Feb 2006
37493 posts
Posted on 10/16/09 at 10:01 am to
quote:

with davies going out, that hurts. if we dont have gooch, making the knockout round would be overachieving imo


goochs presence is a must have



This.
Posted by uway
Member since Sep 2004
33109 posts
Posted on 10/16/09 at 10:25 am to
quote:

Our talent isn't quite there yet, but they still have the fight of a Claudio Reyna and in them. A decent draw could see us to the quarters.


I may be in the minority on this, but this is why I like Bradley starting every game. He's feisty.

Posted by thenry712
Zasullia, Ukraine
Member since Nov 2008
15795 posts
Posted on 10/16/09 at 10:33 am to
Yeah Bradley's enthusiasm is the best on the team. On Wednesday he kept fighting and got the first goal. Occasionally he has his retard moments, see red card vs. Spain.
Posted by Feed Me Popeyes
Baltimore, MD
Member since Apr 2008
2104 posts
Posted on 10/16/09 at 10:34 am to
quote:

USA World Cup 2010 predictions


the draw will make all the difference. I'll wait until then to make a prediction.

I will say that even if we draw into the group of death, anything less than 4 points would be a major disappointment to me
Posted by Stewie Griffin
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2005
16148 posts
Posted on 10/16/09 at 10:42 am to
quote:

he draw will make all the difference. I'll wait until then to make a prediction.


+1
Posted by Keys Open Doors
In hiding with Tupac & XXXTentacion
Member since Dec 2008
31997 posts
Posted on 10/16/09 at 10:46 am to
I agree that the draw makes all the difference. I am going to assume that everyone will be healthy except for Davies for now.

I don't understand why everyone thinks that the US will get screwed in the draw either. Look at the groups we drew in 1998 and 2002. They weren't bad at all.

Posted by RedPop4
Santiago de Compostela
Member since Jan 2005
14453 posts
Posted on 10/16/09 at 10:57 am to
Guys, take a look at this, from a British writer, no less. It's quite optimistic and she makes a couple interesting points about "Bob Ball" that gave me a bit of pause.

Someone else yesterday on FB made a comment about seeing changes. Look at how Timmy is now getting the ball out to his fullbacks instead of simply booming it down the pitch and hoping for the best. Anyway, take this in the spirit it's meant. It's nice to read something like this every now and again.

From the GuardianOnline

quote:

This was not the most straightforward match for the Americans, but the outcome reveals why they will be one of the teams to watch for next summer. They had already gained safe passage to the World Cup, and when their opponents – who needed to win to secure their own qualification – took a 2-0 lead, Bob Bradley's men would have been forgiven for playing out the rest of the game on auto-pilot. They had even more of an excuse in the 83rd minute when they lost the key defender Oguchi Onyewu to a knee tear and, having used all their substitutes, finished up with 10 men.

But there is a sense of defiance, a born hatred of losing, that underpins the spirit of the team. The Americans equalised with a late flourish of which Sir Alex Ferguson would approve. Little wonder they went a bit loopy. There were so many layers of meaning – a dedication to Davies, a face-saver in front of their own fans, and a confirmation that they finished ahead of Mexico to top what has become a pretty menacing group. That may count for something when the seeds are arranged for the draw for the finals.

This successful qualification guarantees the sixth consecutive World Cup for the USA team, dating back to Italia 90. That is not an achievement that some fairly high- profile nations can match. Not England. Not France. Not Holland. But there is something in the air that suggests the USA team are extra serious about this one.

It was in South Africa, at the Confederations Cup last summer, that they produced perhaps the finest display in their footballing history. They stunned even themselves when they scalped Spain to reach the final, which they lost narrowly to Brazil. The USA duly gave themselves a reference point about playing the best around. They know they can give anyone a scare. They feel they are not as far behind the best as the stereotype would have it.

Right now, anyone who gives you shorter odds for Argentina to go far in 2010 is off their rocker. The USA are in a sense everything that the mishmash under Maradona is not. Their team ethic is exceptional, they are drilled to play to their strengths, and their athleticism and attitude makes them a pretty relentless opponent. If the draw is kind to them, they could go further than they have ever been in their modern history.


Having appeared in the World Cup finals of 1930 and 1950, it took them four decades to reappear on the main stage of planet football. At Italia 90, the USA lost all three matches. The journey since then has been considerable. Do they feel ready for a new surge?

Their understated coach, Bradley, is not one for grand statements but he is naturally pleased with the progress. "We are very proud to win the group," he said. "It took a really determined strong effort by our team and we always talk about when you step on the field, you show people what you're all about."
This post was edited on 10/16/09 at 11:00 am
Posted by Keys Open Doors
In hiding with Tupac & XXXTentacion
Member since Dec 2008
31997 posts
Posted on 10/16/09 at 11:01 am to
Yeah, I think that there is a lot of unnecessary criticism of Bradley, especially in the last 2 games. If anything, the defense needs to play farther back and more conservatively.

The ball movement in midfield has been significantly better over the past 2 games as well. Much less kick and run, especially from defense to midfield.

The main challenge will be for the US to find a striker to play off Jozy, and it can't be Ching or Cooper.
This post was edited on 10/16/09 at 11:02 am
Posted by thenry712
Zasullia, Ukraine
Member since Nov 2008
15795 posts
Posted on 10/16/09 at 11:01 am to
British journalism is the best.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram