Started By
Message

re: Ummm, about Mayweather retiring after fight 49

Posted on 7/25/15 at 2:43 pm to
Posted by theenemy
Member since Oct 2006
13078 posts
Posted on 7/25/15 at 2:43 pm to
Golovkin looks to me as the next great. Just a great combination of power and technique. Plus his personality, is very marketable.
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
68413 posts
Posted on 7/25/15 at 3:19 pm to
The problem with the heavier weight classes is that now heartless Europeans dominate. That tells you how worthless those weights are. When I was really into boxing in the late '80's and 90's those frickers would fold at the slightest hint of adversity. Just look at the Klitschkos and the mediocre fighters they lost to. During the 1970's they'd have gotten their asses destroyed by the superior wills of the U.S. boxers.
Posted by theenemy
Member since Oct 2006
13078 posts
Posted on 7/25/15 at 3:30 pm to
quote:

The problem with the heavier weight classes is


The problem is that boxing gymns in inner cities went to shite and young guys came up focusing on other sports (football, basketball, and baseball).

We aren't seeing the american heavyweights with long amateur backgrounds with great boxing skills. Boxing has become more of a fall back sport after those sports don't work out.
Posted by montanagator
Member since Jun 2015
16957 posts
Posted on 7/25/15 at 3:41 pm to
quote:


Why not retire after solidifying himself as the GOAT


What?! He's a great defensive counterpuncher and incredibly smart in the ring, but he's not a complete fighter- even in his prime he didn't have top level power and he's lacked the courage to risk his record and climb the divisions in the way a lot of past greats did (imagine if Roy Jones Jr for example never goes heavyweight - he retires essentially unbeaten (1 DQ) but also no heavyweight belt))

It'd be like calling a high average slap singles hitter the greatest hitter of all time since he had a higher average than Ruth or Bonds.
Posted by Marciano1
Marksville, LA
Member since Jun 2009
18459 posts
Posted on 7/25/15 at 3:42 pm to
quote:

Just look at the Klitschkos and the mediocre fighters they lost to.
You can say that about Wladimir but Vitali was an absolute beast. He lost fights because he had skin that just wouldn't hold up. He was never behind on the scorecards in any of his fights.
Posted by imraged
Member since Nov 2010
2343 posts
Posted on 7/25/15 at 3:44 pm to
Why not just sample a few cards here and there and find a few fighters you like to follow?

I'll probably watch tonight's full card but the only fighter I'm really interested in seeing is Paul Felder.
Posted by TheOcean
#honeyfriedchicken
Member since Aug 2004
42535 posts
Posted on 7/25/15 at 3:49 pm to
quote:

Why not just sample a few cards here and there and find a few fighters you like to follow?


Too many names. Seems like the UFC is just a revolving door
Posted by TigahRag
Sorting Out OT BS Since 2005
Member since May 2005
132775 posts
Posted on 7/25/15 at 4:55 pm to
I can't believe the people that spent the money on his last fight .. Did they think he was going to come out all Tommy Hearns/Marvin Hagler ?? He's fought the same way his entire career ..
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram