Started By
Message

re: Top States that produce NFL players per capita

Posted on 5/4/12 at 12:51 pm to
Posted by LOCO5150
NWA
Member since Sep 2011
4867 posts
Posted on 5/4/12 at 12:51 pm to
FL's #'s are also extremely construed due to the # of people that claim they live there for tax purposes when they in fact don't. Also add to that list the # of vac homes etc.

The first thing one of my friends, who is on the PGA, did when he signed his first endorsement deal was buy a very reasonable home in FL and to claim residency.
Posted by KillianRussell
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2012
7319 posts
Posted on 5/4/12 at 12:53 pm to
Loco has a point, many snowbirders claim Florida as state of residence when they maintain two homes
Posted by UFownstSECsince1950
Member since Dec 2009
32601 posts
Posted on 5/4/12 at 12:56 pm to
Damn near 20% of Florida's population is 65 or older
Posted by bomber77
Member since Aug 2008
14783 posts
Posted on 5/4/12 at 1:16 pm to
quote:

SEC schools in all of the top 7 states....go figure


A higher % of black population has something to do with it of course. I imagine 70% or so players in the NFL are black.
Posted by RedHawk
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2007
8847 posts
Posted on 5/4/12 at 1:22 pm to
Seems like LSU should have won the National Title a few more times. They have 91 NFL players and have no other college in the state to compete against for players.

Alabama has 52, but also has to split that with Auburn. Mississippi has 38, but has to split that between Ole Miss, MSU and to a lesser extent Southern Miss. Florida has 184, but has to split that between Florida, FSU, Miami and South Florida.

Georgia should also be competing for more National Titles than they do.
Posted by VerlanderBEAST
Member since Dec 2011
18984 posts
Posted on 5/4/12 at 2:00 pm to
quote:

Damn near 20% of Florida's population is 65 or older


I would guess 40% of California's population is Mexican who have never touched a pigskin
Posted by TheDarkestNight
Member since May 2012
419 posts
Posted on 5/4/12 at 2:08 pm to
quote:

The State of Louisiana has fewer people than Metropolitan Atlanta.



Hell the total populations of Georgia, South Carolina, Alabama, Mississippi, and Louisiana is barely higher than that of metro NYC. I really wish there was a video game that really would capture how big the island of Manhattan was. Seriously folks get on google maps and get this shite happening.
Posted by Tiger1242
Member since Jul 2011
31912 posts
Posted on 5/4/12 at 2:13 pm to
quote:

For example: Tejas and Florida have pretty similar state populations (they have a couple million more, but they're both up there around 20-25 million). Tejas however, has something like 5x the number of high school students that Florida does......yet we put just as many kids into the NFL & D1 (if not more)

Did you read the OP? Texas has 7 million more ppl than you and 30 more NFL players
Posted by TheDarkestNight
Member since May 2012
419 posts
Posted on 5/4/12 at 2:15 pm to
quote:

Georgia should also be competing for more National Titles than they do


4 sschools heavily recruit that state.
Posted by chalmetteowl
Chalmette
Member since Jan 2008
47575 posts
Posted on 5/4/12 at 2:22 pm to
so why are we using per capita when women don't play football?

also i wish we could tally up snaps played by players from each state

and i guess it goes by what high school you went to to determine what state you count under?
Posted by St Augustine
The Pauper of the Surf
Member since Mar 2006
64197 posts
Posted on 5/4/12 at 2:33 pm to
quote:

came in expecting ohio near the top 10, left kinda in shock.


its about NFL football players
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
112460 posts
Posted on 5/4/12 at 2:34 pm to
quote:

came in expecting ohio near the top 10, left kinda in shock.

I've always thought Ohio has too many D-I college football teams for a state that size. What is it? 8 or 9? Louisiana has 5 and that's too many.
Posted by Golfer
Member since Nov 2005
75052 posts
Posted on 5/4/12 at 2:52 pm to
quote:

I've always thought Ohio has too many D-I college football teams for a state that size. What is it? 8 or 9?


Ohio is the 7th most populous state.
Posted by BayouBengal
Member since Nov 2003
28275 posts
Posted on 5/4/12 at 2:53 pm to
hmmmm...someone is on reddit.
Posted by SwatMitchell
Austin, TX
Member since Jan 2005
2312 posts
Posted on 5/4/12 at 3:45 pm to
quote:

I would guess 40% of California's population is Mexican who have never touched a pigskin


...and very few Hispanics in TX
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
112460 posts
Posted on 5/4/12 at 4:32 pm to
quote:

Ohio is the 7th most populous state.

So, why do they have more D1 schools than Calif or NY?
Posted by Poodlebrain
Way Right of Rex
Member since Jan 2004
19860 posts
Posted on 5/4/12 at 4:35 pm to
quote:

total state population doesn't mean anything fwiw....

You couldn't be more wrong. The chances of the players being distributed among the various positions improves. And since you need players at all of the positions size does matter.
Posted by chalmetteowl
Chalmette
Member since Jan 2008
47575 posts
Posted on 5/4/12 at 4:48 pm to
it'd be a truer picture if we divided NFL players by the male population aged 20-40
Posted by LOCO5150
NWA
Member since Sep 2011
4867 posts
Posted on 5/4/12 at 5:00 pm to
quote:

it'd be a truer picture if we divided NFL players by the male population aged 20-40
.

This

Does anyone have one of these that shows all time #'s?
Posted by tiger perry
Member since Dec 2009
25668 posts
Posted on 5/4/12 at 5:04 pm to
quote:

Georgia should also be competing for more National Titles than they do.



been saying that for years..
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram