- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Ohio State has a better record and tougher schedule than TCU and Baylor
Posted on 12/7/14 at 12:04 pm to lsupride87
Posted on 12/7/14 at 12:04 pm to lsupride87
If they had listed all three teams resumès without their names, Ohio state would have been sixth
2
Posted on 12/7/14 at 12:04 pm to ballscaster
lol wut
Big 12 conference play >> B1G conference play
and neither TCU or Baylor have a bad loss.
Big 12 conference play >> B1G conference play
and neither TCU or Baylor have a bad loss.
Posted on 12/7/14 at 12:05 pm to lsupride87
Usually boxers take less obvious dives than Wisconsin did last night.
Posted on 12/7/14 at 12:05 pm to lsupride87
Alabama basically is getting a first round bye in the semifinals is what it is...
Posted on 12/7/14 at 12:07 pm to stlslick
quote:
They got in, because they are a football factory who makes NCAA a lot of money and they have an army of spending power with their fans.
TCU doesn't even have the fan base to sell out a home game when thier team is ranked in the top 5. You have to think the NCAA and bowl committees were praying that they wouldn't get in.
Posted on 12/7/14 at 12:07 pm to ballscaster
Agreed. Committee got it right. Everyone needs to DWI
Posted on 12/7/14 at 12:08 pm to stlslick
quote:
They got in because they have a better record and a tougher schedule, despite what bitter sore loser types think.
Posted on 12/7/14 at 12:09 pm to fleaux
Ohio State got in because they are a traditional power while TCU and Baylor isn't.
End of Story.
End of Story.
Posted on 12/7/14 at 12:09 pm to lsupride87
quote:...who knows how to do math.
Youa re saying it is tougher by using opponents winning percentage like a 12 yr old.
Posted on 12/7/14 at 12:09 pm to Diddles
If the small 9 is unhappy about this, they can fix it with three moves:
1) Fire your moron commissioner
2) Actually have 12 teams (Houston, SMU, Texas St. Tulane are available)
3) Reclaim the name Southwest Conference - Yes, it is deeply tainted, but as they say in NASCAR and Bama, "If you ain't cheat'in you ain't tryin'"
1) Fire your moron commissioner
2) Actually have 12 teams (Houston, SMU, Texas St. Tulane are available)
3) Reclaim the name Southwest Conference - Yes, it is deeply tainted, but as they say in NASCAR and Bama, "If you ain't cheat'in you ain't tryin'"
This post was edited on 12/7/14 at 12:12 pm
Posted on 12/7/14 at 12:09 pm to ballscaster
They didn't have a tougher schedule. And please don't post your stupid shite about opponents opponents winning % like that means shite
Posted on 12/7/14 at 12:12 pm to Sandperson
If the Big 12 commissioner would have been knighting for Baylor he would have been kicking sand in the eye of TCU. He couldn't hurt TCU's chances.
Posted on 12/7/14 at 12:12 pm to fleaux
quote:
If they had listed all three teams resumès without their names, Ohio state would have been sixth
School - winning % - opponents' winning % - opponents' opponents' winning %
School1 0.923 0.571 0.535
School2 0.917 0.464 0.520
School3 0.917 0.491 0.532
Rank them.
Posted on 12/7/14 at 12:13 pm to RogerTheShrubber
Yeah people want to find a conspiracy when the committee actually got it right. I can get on board with the idea of only releasing one ranking, and I've campaigned for that, but the bottom line is the best 4 teams are in. If you hey would have released one ranking and this was it, I don't believe the bitching would be as bad.
Posted on 12/7/14 at 12:14 pm to ballscaster
quote:
Ohio State has a tougher schedule
Posted on 12/7/14 at 12:14 pm to StraightCashHomey21
quote:Despite this, Ohio State has a better record vs. a tougher schedule.
lol wut
Big 12 conference play >> B1G conference play
and neither TCU or Baylor have a bad loss.
Posted on 12/7/14 at 12:16 pm to lsupride87
quote:You mean the official record of the results on the field? Sure, disregard that.
They didn't have a tougher schedule. And please don't post your stupid shite about opponents opponents winning % like that means shite
You have six games of evidence to support your opinion. I have hundreds.
Posted on 12/7/14 at 12:17 pm to slackster
quote:Couldn't agree more.
Yeah people want to find a conspiracy when the committee actually got it right. I can get on board with the idea of only releasing one ranking, and I've campaigned for that, but the bottom line is the best 4 teams are in. If you hey would have released one ranking and this was it, I don't believe the bitching would be as bad.
Posted on 12/7/14 at 12:17 pm to ballscaster
quote:this is the fricking stupidest shite. Stop posting this
School - winning % - opponents' winning % - opponents' opponents' winning %
School1 0.923 0.571 0.535
School2 0.917 0.464 0.520
School3 0.917 0.491 0.532
rank them
School 1 wins 13, 8 loss 6-6 at home other teams who arent complete shite Minnesotta
School 2 wins 3, 9 loss 7-5 away other opponents who arent complete shite Oklahoma
School3 wins 9 loss to # 6 other teams who arent complete shite Minnesotta and oklahoma
This post was edited on 12/7/14 at 12:19 pm
Posted on 12/7/14 at 12:18 pm to ballscaster
quote:In your moronic stat, a 4-8 win for ohio st is just as important as their win over Wisky and Mich st. It is moronic
You have six games of evidence to support your opinion. I have hundreds
Page 2 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News