- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: LHSAA meetings....looks like more trouble on the horizon.
Posted on 12/12/12 at 9:49 am to Lee Chatelain
Posted on 12/12/12 at 9:49 am to Lee Chatelain
quote:
I mean really, what's the point of this association? Kind of like the NCAA? I wish about 20 major high schools/college teams would just say "frick YOU" and go out on their own.
In their favor, they're setting up a stupid bitch from Bossier City to get her arse sued off by Tut Musemeche because she violated LHSAA rules in having him hauled off the field in handcuffs for challenging her authority.
0
Posted on 12/12/12 at 9:49 am to choupiquesushi
quote:
Also hearing that several principals want to revisit the play up rule or amend it to make any school playing up to go all the way up.
this just makes sense...
Posted on 12/12/12 at 9:50 am to ThisWayChad
quote:
[quote] Also hearing that several principals want to revisit the play up rule or amend it to make any school playing up to go all the way up. [quote]
this just makes sense...
The Catholic League and Evangel would have no problem with this, but a bunch of 5A schools would lose their shite if Evangel starts arse-reaming the entire classification again like the did in the late 90s / early 2000s.
Posted on 12/12/12 at 9:52 am to choupiquesushi
if that had been in place a while back, abbeville high would have 3-4 state titles by now
Posted on 12/12/12 at 9:55 am to choupiquesushi
quote:
no link... that is from past actions and current comments to other principals..
What past actions? Your basically running off at the mouth with zero proof. Neville doesnt play WM because Shows wouldn't agree to a home/home when Neville moved to 4A.
Posted on 12/12/12 at 9:57 am to teke184
quote:
Evangel
Not anywhere close to what they once were.
Posted on 12/12/12 at 10:00 am to Lee Chatelain
quote:
I wish about 20 major high schools/college teams would just say "frick YOU" and go out on their own.
i would say all of classes 4A and 5A... it's absurd to have Rummel and Grand Isle competing under the same organization with vastly different budgets, fanbases, missions, etc.
Posted on 12/12/12 at 10:06 am to General
quote:
Shows wouldnt agree to a home and home
They played a home and home. WM won both. Then McCarty said in The News Star he didn't want to play WM anymore because WM only had to get up to play Neville and no one else on their schedule so it was unfair to Neville. Not sure why that makes a difference in week 2.
I wish they would play yearly at ULM. It's a great rivalry and a great game generally. Posted on 12/12/12 at 10:12 am to Golfer
quote:
t they have kids from Jefferson and even plaquemines...
Most Charter schools can pull from neighboring parishes.
Karr(& Walker) is part of the Algiers Charter School arse, you must live in Orleans Parish.
Posted on 12/12/12 at 10:20 am to General
quote:
What past actions? Your basically running off at the mouth with zero proof. Neville doesnt play WM because Shows wouldn't agree to a home/home when Neville moved to 4A.
his being behind the original play in your class ruling when Neville got beat in playoffs by curtis..
and listening to him talk to other principals....
ain't running off at the mouth sir... just stating what I have heard and been told by folks...
Posted on 12/12/12 at 10:20 am to JJ27
quote:
They played a home and home. WM won both. Then McCarty said in The News Star he didn't want to play WM anymore because WM only had to get up to play Neville and no one else on their schedule so it was unfair to Neville. Not sure why that makes a difference in week 2. I wish they would play yearly at ULM. It's a great rivalry and a great game generally.
Yeah. Back in 2001 Shows would only play at WM or ULM. Neville will never agree to that bullshite. Im not sure of all the reasons for not playing the last 2 years but in 09-10 Neville started the season with Bastrop(jam), Ouachita (Rivalry), WM (rivalry), Marshall, Tx. WM had Rayville, Leesville, Neville, Richwood.
I think we should play but thats not my decision. I know Vidrine doesnt like Shows and Vice-versa so when he finally retires I can see it happening again.
Posted on 12/12/12 at 10:22 am to teke184
quote:
The Catholic League and Evangel would have no problem with this,
no... no they wouldn't....the catholic league that is..
Posted on 12/12/12 at 10:28 am to choupiquesushi
quote:
his being behind the original play in your class ruling when Neville got beat in playoffs by curtis..
He wasnt behind the original play in class rule. That was Charles Scriber who was RUSTON's principal at the time and was in the same district with ECA. WM and Neville never proposed anything about play in class yet shoulder all the blame for it. The current select/ non-select shite was proposed by South Beau. Neville will probably be a select school next year so why would he be behind something thats gonna make it harder to win a Championship. Either way if Neville were to get to the Dome again next year they would have to go through Karr. He isnt running from anything.
Posted on 12/12/12 at 10:31 am to General
quote:
He wasnt behind the original play in class rule.
He spoke and lobbied in favor of it...
Posted on 12/12/12 at 10:34 am to choupiquesushi
quote:
He spoke and lobbied in favor of it...
I guess he was the only one. He passed it single-handily despite having 1 vote.
Posted on 12/12/12 at 10:51 am to TigerintheNO
quote:
Karr(& Walker) is part of the Algiers Charter School arse, you must live in Orleans Parish.
Alright. I know the ones in BR can pull from WBR (and Livingston, I believe) based on their location and distance from the school.
Posted on 12/12/12 at 10:55 am to choupiquesushi
quote:
amend it to make any school playing up to go all the way up.
and there is a lot of support for football only classifications.
Posted on 12/12/12 at 11:03 am to choupiquesushi
When are these meetings and when would legislation take affect?
Posted on 12/12/12 at 11:23 am to choupiquesushi
quote:
Jesuit principal got the current play up one class rule pushed through to get the league back together..
some of their principals were part of the original play in your enrollment class because of ECA in 5a and the talk of Curtis being in their district.. prior to katrina.
then when katrina came along... and juggle the numbers.. the catholic league has led the charge on play up.. as long as it didn't put curtis or eca with them.
The Jesuit/Giambelluca plan was NOT designed to keep Curtis and Evangel out of 5A. It was the most likely plan possible to get what he wanted -- putting the Catholic League back together -- to pass a vote. Out of the member schools, only 3A (in fear of Curtis/Evangel) were going to oppose the one-class concept.
Posted on 12/12/12 at 11:45 am to Jwho77
quote:
The Jesuit/Giambelluca plan was NOT designed to keep Curtis and Evangel out of 5A. It was the most likely plan possible to get what he wanted -- putting the Catholic League back together -- to pass a vote. Out of the member schools, only 3A (in fear of Curtis/Evangel) were going to oppose the one-class concept.
bollocks..... then why did he not include playing up multiple classes? He knew he would get votes needed by 4a folks wanting to get rid of shaw hc and st aug... in nola.... what he did was create 3a vs all the other classes..... and now some of the folks in cahoots with them in the first place are not happy.. .
and general.. never said BV did it single handed.. just said he was a driving force.
This post was edited on 12/12/12 at 11:49 am
Page 2 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News