Started By
Message

re: Is Houston considered a big sports market?

Posted on 6/26/12 at 4:53 pm to
Posted by ShaneTheLegLechler
Member since Dec 2011
60313 posts
Posted on 6/26/12 at 4:53 pm to
Dallas, Houston, DC, Atlanta and Miami all have huge transplant populations on that list
Posted by WinnPtiger
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2011
23962 posts
Posted on 6/26/12 at 4:53 pm to
quote:

Dallas, Houston, DC, Atlanta and Miami all have huge transplant populations on that list


I wouldn't consider Dallas in that. I would venture to say at least 75% of people that live in DFW grew up within 200 miles of the area

eta: and in Texas that isn't very far
This post was edited on 6/26/12 at 4:54 pm
Posted by ShaneTheLegLechler
Member since Dec 2011
60313 posts
Posted on 6/26/12 at 4:57 pm to
quote:

I wouldn't consider Dallas in that.


I don't think Dallas is as big as Houston but a fair amount are coming from out of state due to the economy. Maybe huge isn't right, but it still seems like it's pretty big whenever I'm there. I'd definitely put it over places like Boston, Philly and Chicago.
Posted by WinnPtiger
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2011
23962 posts
Posted on 6/26/12 at 5:02 pm to
quote:

I don't think Dallas is as big as Houston but a fair amount are coming from out of state due to the economy. Maybe huge isn't right, but it still seems like it's pretty big whenever I'm there. I'd definitely put it over places like Boston, Philly and Chicago.


Valid point. I think that leads to interesting make up. Like you said, the economy is so good, people want to come work here, but people don't want to leave either
Posted by rondo
Worst. Poster. Evar.
Member since Jan 2004
77416 posts
Posted on 6/26/12 at 5:06 pm to
The superdome is always rocking no matter what the saints record is.
Posted by AlexLSU
Member since Jan 2005
25341 posts
Posted on 6/26/12 at 5:08 pm to
No data present, but IMO I'd say NYC, LA, Chicago, DFW, Boston, Philadelphia, and Miami are all bigger sports markets. Houston is second tier with ATL, Denver, Phoenix, Bay Area, etc.

Hopefully that trend will change. Houston has great facilities, two really competitive teams (Texans/Rockets) and hopefully the Astros pick up steam with the move to the AL West. I know Houston put a bid in for the 2012 Olympics years back. That would've done a lot for the city as far as a sports market.
Posted by Klark Kent
Houston via BR
Member since Jan 2008
67051 posts
Posted on 6/26/12 at 5:08 pm to
quote:

and that 30% of the population has English as a second-language



ehhh, my issue with Houston for sure.
Posted by VerlanderBEAST
Member since Dec 2011
18989 posts
Posted on 6/26/12 at 5:10 pm to
As far as sports markets go Boston>>>Chicago
Posted by ShaneTheLegLechler
Member since Dec 2011
60313 posts
Posted on 6/26/12 at 5:12 pm to
I disagree with Miami but the rest I agree with. I think if Houston had an NFL team that was a consistent contender it would go a very long way, since that is clearly the #1 sport in the city.
This post was edited on 6/26/12 at 5:13 pm
Posted by Dr RC
The Money Pit
Member since Aug 2011
58178 posts
Posted on 6/26/12 at 5:19 pm to


b/c they still remember their Choke City days
Posted by DrVinnyBoombatz
Lubbock
Member since Oct 2011
3128 posts
Posted on 6/26/12 at 5:50 pm to
I would venture to say that the reason Houston isn't considered a big sports market, even though they are population wise, is because they are all 'new' teams. The Rockets don't fall in this category because they have had well known players and have won championships and have been around for awhile.

The Texans are a relatively new team, plus the Oilers were loved so it took some time to get over them. The Astros are a lot like the Rangers, never could get a huge following until recently, except the Astros weren't able to keep up their success which killed their teams popularity.

Tradition has a lot to do with a perception of a 'big market'. The amount of money spent on a team and the players also give a feel that its a big market team. Up to about a couple of years ago, the Rangers were considered a 'small market' team. That is a couple of reasons why Boston is considered a big market, although they do branch out to most of New England. Plus, the more bandwagon fans there are all over the country makes it seem like a big market team.

I do think the perception of Houston is changing as their teams get bigger and more successful.
Posted by RandyVandy
Member since Nov 2011
954 posts
Posted on 6/26/12 at 5:56 pm to
quote:

Dallas, Houston, DC, Atlanta and Miami all have huge transplant populations on that list


And LA and NY don't? 40% of LA's residents were not only not born in Metro LA, but were not even born in the United States.
This post was edited on 6/26/12 at 6:06 pm
Posted by ShaneTheLegLechler
Member since Dec 2011
60313 posts
Posted on 6/26/12 at 6:02 pm to
quote:

And LA and NY don't? 40% of LA's residents were not only not born in Metro LA, but where not even born in the United States.


By transplant I meant within the US. Those areas I listed (though maybe not Dallas as much) have lots of people who have moved from other US metro areas and already have other fan allegiances.

To me having a large immigrant population represents an opportunity to grow as a sports city in the long term.
Posted by ShaneTheLegLechler
Member since Dec 2011
60313 posts
Posted on 6/26/12 at 6:02 pm to
Agree with all of your post
Posted by ottothewise
Member since Sep 2008
32094 posts
Posted on 6/26/12 at 6:05 pm to
quote:

Considered medium market by most.

It seems really only NYC, LA and Chicago are considered big markets



it is a big market for advertising considerations.

for the purposes of selecting a home base, it has no 'bohemian' culture. It is less attractive to players because its a boring redneck oil town.
NYC has bohemians and a bohemian culture and a black music culture.
Chicago has a bohemian culture and a black music culture.
L.A. has movie stars and access to Hollywood.

So... Houston is a big market but finishes out of the money when you are talking about great cities to live in and enjoy.
Chicago and NYC have better opera, better symphony, better jazz, and lots of legitimate theatre and the best dance companies. Players may not care about all that but their wives do.

One more thing, Houston is IMMENSE so it has that same down side as LA, Chicago and NYC have.



This post was edited on 6/26/12 at 6:11 pm
Posted by RandyVandy
Member since Nov 2011
954 posts
Posted on 6/26/12 at 6:08 pm to
(no message)
Posted by ShaneTheLegLechler
Member since Dec 2011
60313 posts
Posted on 6/26/12 at 6:09 pm to
quote:

Players may not care about all that but their wives do.


No. I agree Houston is much less attractive but it has nothing to do with having an opera or some shite. It has to do with it being a smaller market than NYC, LA or Chicago and having much less attractive nightlife and celebrity life than those three. Nobody gives a shite about the symphony or opera.
Posted by Enfuego
Uptown
Member since Mar 2009
9883 posts
Posted on 6/26/12 at 6:12 pm to
quote:

Message Posted by rondo The superdome is always rocking no matter what the saints record is.


Nooooooope.

Posted by saintsfan22
baton rouge
Member since May 2006
71943 posts
Posted on 6/26/12 at 6:14 pm to
quote:

Chicago and NYC have better opera, better symphony, better jazz, and lots of legitimate theatre and the best dance companies. Players may not care about all that but their wives do.


@ Wives
@NBA Wives caring about the symphony and operas.
This post was edited on 6/26/12 at 6:16 pm
Posted by mattz1122
Member since Oct 2007
52961 posts
Posted on 6/26/12 at 6:27 pm to
quote:

Just as many Cowboys, Saints, and Steelers fans in Houston as Texans.



first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram