- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: IMO: if youre under 35, cannot compare Warriors and Bulls
Posted on 4/20/16 at 7:52 pm to PrimeTime Money
Posted on 4/20/16 at 7:52 pm to PrimeTime Money
quote:
Uhhh, no. The pace was much slower in the 90's and scoring was low. In fact, it's one of the reasons they changed the illegal defense rules.
The first half of the 90s was very high scoring as well as the 80s
1
Posted on 4/20/16 at 7:53 pm to jg8623
That is true.
Posted on 4/20/16 at 7:54 pm to PrimeTime Money
Yea, it's a solid decline from the 96 season on in ppg
But a bunch of people don't realize the 80s and early 90s had scoring averages between 105 and 110 per game
But a bunch of people don't realize the 80s and early 90s had scoring averages between 105 and 110 per game
Posted on 4/20/16 at 7:56 pm to jg8623
quote:You see it almost daily, guys talking about no defense today compared to the 80s and 90s.
But a bunch of people don't realize the 80s and early 90s had scoring averages between 105 and 110 per game
Posted on 4/20/16 at 8:01 pm to AmericanSpirit
This post is dumb
Posted on 4/20/16 at 8:03 pm to AmericanSpirit
quote:
But if you're under 35, shut the frick up with your Bulls knob slobbering
quote:
It's just a built in nostalgia that people want to assume the past is automatically better than the present.
Under 35 people don't do that...they do the opposite of old people.
Posted on 4/20/16 at 8:10 pm to AmericanSpirit
quote:
But if you're under 35, shut the frick up with your Bulls knob slobbering.
I'm 32 and grew up in Chicago watching and going to Bulls games. So...no.
Posted on 4/20/16 at 8:15 pm to Dire Wolf
quote:
are over 35, you are too busy to watch warriors cause you likely have kids and when the bulls were going you probably only watched 14 games tops (unless you were in Chicago
WGN had most if not all of their games. One of the reasons (besides MJ) they were so popular.
Posted on 4/20/16 at 8:16 pm to AmericanSpirit
quote:
I'm not over 35 either so I'm not gonna bother to compare
quote:
my opinion is that the hypothetical series where Kerr the player has to play Kerr the coach would go 6-7 games
quote:
But if you're under 35
quote:
shut the frick up
Posted on 4/20/16 at 8:35 pm to AmericanSpirit
In today's era the Warriors would give them a run for their money. In the Bulls era, the Bulls would win in 5.
Posted on 4/20/16 at 8:38 pm to St Augustine
quote:
WGN had most if not all of their games. One of the reasons (besides MJ) they were so popular.
Good point. It wasn't every game, but WGN had a lot of them. And you could almost guarantee every weekend double or triple header on NBC would feature the Bulls.
In fact, if the OP wanted to argue that the Warriors don't get the same respect because their viewership is hurt by late tip times and TV deals, it would at least be more valid than bullshite about age and nostalgia.
This post was edited on 4/20/16 at 8:39 pm
Posted on 4/20/16 at 8:38 pm to AmericanSpirit
Playing with pre hand-check rules, the Bulls would dominate the Warriors as would the Kobe/Shaq Lakers. The Warriors wouldn't be able to shoot so many 3's with physical defense.
Posted on 4/20/16 at 8:41 pm to AmericanSpirit
quote:
I don't think Thompson and Green are as good as Pippen and Rodman either, but again.
You lost me here.
Clay = Pippen
Green >>>>>>> Rodman
Posted on 4/20/16 at 8:58 pm to MSH
does OP realize that virtually every 1996 Bulls playoff game is on youtube as well as a handful of regular season games? But when it comes to Warriors vs Bulls or any other great team from previous eras. The Warriors lose because they have a huge deficiency in post scoring/defense and rebounding
This post was edited on 4/20/16 at 9:03 pm
Posted on 4/20/16 at 8:59 pm to AmericanSpirit
I'm 33 and yes I can. Bulls would beat that arse
Posted on 4/20/16 at 9:05 pm to AmericanSpirit
JFC, I love Curry, but top five of all time displaces one of the following:
MJ
Bron
Magic
Bird
Russel
In short, pump the fricking breaks.
MJ
Bron
Magic
Bird
Russel
In short, pump the fricking breaks.
This post was edited on 4/20/16 at 9:06 pm
Posted on 4/20/16 at 9:07 pm to MSH
Clay = Pippen
MSB strikes again!
MSB strikes again!
Posted on 4/20/16 at 9:09 pm to Solo
quote:
Clay = Pippen
MSB strikes again!
can't make it upPosted on 4/20/16 at 9:29 pm to airfernando
quote:How is physical defense going to stop someone from shooting an open 3 pointer?
Playing with pre hand-check rules, the Bulls would dominate the Warriors as would the Kobe/Shaq Lakers. The Warriors wouldn't be able to shoot so many 3's with physical defense.
Posted on 4/20/16 at 9:32 pm to AmericanSpirit
If ur over 35 u cant really compare either.... Because the nostalgia factor that everything was better back n the day lol
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News