- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Does Clemson deserve a mulligan for outplaying Bama?
Posted on 1/12/16 at 3:34 am to ChunkyLover54
Posted on 1/12/16 at 3:34 am to ChunkyLover54
How do you feel about Lawson not knowing what a line of scrimmage is?
Thank goodness he was called for that shite
Thank goodness he was called for that shite
1
Posted on 1/12/16 at 3:39 am to HollierThanThou
quote:This. We've all watched enough football games to realize we just saw two really good teams in an even matchup. Clemson was impressive and a well deserving NC opponent for an equally impressive team. That's why we like this sport, isn't it?
Both teams were deserving but Bama executed just a little better.
Posted on 1/12/16 at 6:32 am to ChunkyLover54
Only Bama gets mulligans. It is in ESPN's contract with the College Football Playoffs and the BCS before that.
Posted on 1/12/16 at 6:42 am to ChunkyLover54
No
Posted on 1/12/16 at 6:51 am to ChunkyLover54
Alabama wore Clemson down. Bama won and deservedly so.
Posted on 1/12/16 at 6:51 am to ChunkyLover54
quote:
Does Clemson deserve a mulligan for outplaying Bama?
OJ Howard is still running
Posted on 1/12/16 at 6:56 am to WeeWee
quote:today is let the butthurt out day
Only Bama gets mulligans.
Posted on 1/12/16 at 7:52 am to ChunkyLover54
Something tells me you probably have a case full of participant trophies at home... 
This post was edited on 1/12/16 at 7:54 am
Posted on 1/12/16 at 7:59 am to bountyhunter
quote:
Saban gameplanning to gain a possession with the on-side kick is what won that game
And he did that because as soon as Clemson got the ball back they went down the field in two plays. It was brilliant. He knew that D wasnt going to just hold up the rest of the game. He needed something to steal a possession from them.
Posted on 1/12/16 at 9:03 am to ChunkyLover54
What the hell does this even mean? A mulligan? You want them to replay the game?
Posted on 1/12/16 at 9:08 am to ragincajun03
If I'm a Clemson fan, it haunts me thinking about how they lost this. They had two possessions late third/early fourth when they were up three where they could have taken control of the game. It seemed like they went for some killshot throws when they should have run slants/screens or running plays. Then, the fallaway bomb from Coker into a basket. Then, the onside kick. Then, the kickoff return TD. Then, the Howard screen. 
This post was edited on 1/12/16 at 9:14 am
Posted on 1/12/16 at 9:11 am to Bunk Moreland
Clemson would've won if their defense could tackle as well as Alabamas Right Tackle did on some of those holding calls
Or if they put someone on the right side of a kick off formation
Or if they even tried to cover Howard
Or if they put someone on the right side of a kick off formation
Or if they even tried to cover Howard
Posted on 1/12/16 at 9:16 am to ChunkyLover54
Here is a unbiased view-
Outside of 6 plays, Clemson actually dominated the game. Clemson drove up and down the field on Alabama D, while bama scored on a couple of busted coverages and 2 other long plays. Clemson dominated both lines of scrimmage.
The onside kick was the turning point, the second and long completion to Howard sealed the game. Clemson had a player in position to tackle him in the backfield, if they make the tackle its third and 15.
Glad it was a good game, although it was a bit anticlimactic once bama built a 2 score lead in the 4th.
Outside of 6 plays, Clemson actually dominated the game. Clemson drove up and down the field on Alabama D, while bama scored on a couple of busted coverages and 2 other long plays. Clemson dominated both lines of scrimmage.
The onside kick was the turning point, the second and long completion to Howard sealed the game. Clemson had a player in position to tackle him in the backfield, if they make the tackle its third and 15.
Glad it was a good game, although it was a bit anticlimactic once bama built a 2 score lead in the 4th.
Posted on 1/12/16 at 9:19 am to ragincajun03
quote:
What the hell does this even mean? A mulligan? You want them to replay the game?
I was thinking the same thing.
Posted on 1/12/16 at 9:20 am to ChunkyLover54
D.Watson's INT is still huge in my mind. If Clemson would have been able to make this a two score game. I think they would have won.
Also, having no answer for Howard was ridiculous.
Also, having no answer for Howard was ridiculous.
Posted on 1/12/16 at 9:24 am to ChunkyLover54
Clemson did not outplay Bama. Take off your homer glasses. It was a close fought game but, in the end, Bama made more plays.
Posted on 1/12/16 at 9:43 am to ChunkyLover54
Clemson played a great game. Your consolation prize will be seeing the game played over and over again on ESPNU until next season starts. Enjoy.
This post was edited on 1/12/16 at 9:48 am
Posted on 1/12/16 at 10:45 am to ChunkyLover54
quote:
While this year's format would not allow for it, do you believe them to be worthy of a mulligan given the precident?
Posted on 1/12/16 at 11:16 am to ChunkyLover54
This is ridiculous. Fluke plays only shouldn't count when they are turnovers.
Posted on 1/12/16 at 12:27 pm to biglego
Clemson not having there best player on d lost them the game
Page 2 of 3
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News