Started By
Message

re: BCS Super Bowl: Falcons vs. Patriots...

Posted on 1/16/11 at 7:46 pm to
Posted by Kafka
I am the moral conscience of TD
Member since Jul 2007
141793 posts
Posted on 1/16/11 at 7:46 pm to
quote:

if they somehow won it all. . .you would say they were the best team in CFB?


i would say they were the champions
Posted by RockChalkTiger
A Little Bit South of Saskatoon
Member since May 2009
10326 posts
Posted on 1/16/11 at 7:50 pm to
quote:

The OP's scenario is the very REASON the BCS > NFL Playoffs.


At least we KNOW Rogers and Roethlisberger are getting paid.
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
76471 posts
Posted on 1/16/11 at 7:52 pm to
quote:

i would say they were the champions
But not the best team?
Posted by GoBigOrange86
Meine sich're Zuflucht
Member since Jun 2008
14486 posts
Posted on 1/16/11 at 8:02 pm to
quote:

But not the best team?


Maybe not. I don't think there's any disputing that the Patriots were the best team in 2007. But the Giants were the champions, which I guess is the title that matters.
Posted by Meursault
Nashville
Member since Sep 2003
25172 posts
Posted on 1/16/11 at 8:05 pm to
quote:

BCS pretty much nails it every year.


I don't want to, but I agree with this.
Posted by DaGarun
Smashville
Member since Nov 2007
26184 posts
Posted on 1/16/11 at 8:39 pm to
quote:

More like reason why nfl playoffs are a fail for determining best team

But never fail in determining an inarguable champion.
Posted by DaGarun
Smashville
Member since Nov 2007
26184 posts
Posted on 1/16/11 at 8:41 pm to
quote:

But not the best team?

Who cares about the popularity contest? Prove it on the field under duress. That's the champion (and de facto best team)
Posted by Shankopotomus
Social Distanced
Member since Feb 2009
21057 posts
Posted on 1/16/11 at 8:45 pm to
But that same team also beat that opponent earlier in the season which means 2-1 record. Bad example IMO
Posted by WG_Dawg
Hoover
Member since Jun 2004
86460 posts
Posted on 1/16/11 at 8:48 pm to
quote:

Did you watch the Falcons and Pats this weekend? Still think either of them deserves the title of "best team?"


Why are you selectively choosing one game to judge the falcons' season, and not the previous 16 games they played in the regular season?
Posted by BayouBengals03
lsu14always
Member since Nov 2007
99999 posts
Posted on 1/16/11 at 8:56 pm to
Screw the Falcons.
Posted by DaGarun
Smashville
Member since Nov 2007
26184 posts
Posted on 1/16/11 at 9:33 pm to
quote:

Why are you selectively choosing one game to judge the falcons' season, and not the previous 16 games they played in the regular season?

Because they lost when it mattered?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422214 posts
Posted on 1/16/11 at 9:37 pm to
quote:

Because they lost when it mattered?

tautological argument

"it matters" because its the playoff system

you can't say the playoffs are when it matters, because when it matters is the playoffs
Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
101329 posts
Posted on 1/16/11 at 9:37 pm to
quote:

the NFL playoffs, where a team beats the living dogshit out of another team in the regular season not too long ago and its meaningless
Yep. It insured the Pats got homefield, which as you say, apparently didn't mean much for them.
Posted by DaGarun
Smashville
Member since Nov 2007
26184 posts
Posted on 1/16/11 at 9:41 pm to
quote:

you can't say the playoffs are when it matters, because when it matters is the playoffs

In just about every major competition worldwide, I can. Well, except major college football. Why is the BCS better at establishing the "best" again?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422214 posts
Posted on 1/16/11 at 9:43 pm to
quote:

Why is the BCS better at establishing the "best" again?

it uses 12-13 games in its sample to judge teams instead of 3-4. how is that not better?
Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
101329 posts
Posted on 1/16/11 at 9:45 pm to
Why is the December 6 game between the Pats and Jets more determinative of your opinion of who's the "better" team between these two, than today's game or the earlier Jets victory?
Posted by DaGarun
Smashville
Member since Nov 2007
26184 posts
Posted on 1/16/11 at 9:47 pm to
quote:

it uses 12-13 games in its sample to judge teams instead of 3-4. how is that not better?

Because it uses subjectivity in its formula. Like Ice Skating.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422214 posts
Posted on 1/16/11 at 9:49 pm to
neither on their own is determinative

Team A

14-2, 5-1 in the AFC East, 8-0 at home, 6-2 on the road, 518 points for, 313 points against (205 net)

vs

Team B

11-5, 4-2 in the AFC East, 5-3 at home, 6-2 on the road, 367 points for, 304 points against (63 net)
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422214 posts
Posted on 1/16/11 at 9:50 pm to
quote:

Because it uses subjectivity in its formula. Like Ice Skating.

the end-all, be-all determinative stat is wins/losses, which is objective
Posted by BayouBengals03
lsu14always
Member since Nov 2007
99999 posts
Posted on 1/16/11 at 9:52 pm to
The more and more NFL and college football seasons I watch, the more and more I think a 4-team playoff is the absolute best way to determine a champion.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram