- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: At what point will you say Lebron is better than Jordan was?
Posted on 4/25/17 at 12:41 pm to Boomshockalocka
Posted on 4/25/17 at 12:41 pm to Boomshockalocka
quote:
Fg% doesn't determine who is the better shooter. Can't use The three point % Bc that shot wasn't a part of the game then like it is now. There' should be no debate on who was the better shooter of the two.
Lol MJ was unreal from midrange. LBJ is equal to or slightly better from 3.
Posted on 4/25/17 at 12:41 pm to Goldrush25
Delving a little more deeply, Jordan carved out his largest niche in the 10-14 foot area. He attempted 466 shots within this range – second here was Grant Hill with 258 attempts, the only other guy to post even half of Jordan’s number. Michael’s 480 points scored on such shots is far and away the benchmark from this distance since NBA.com began their location tracking:
But inside the arc is where the real magic happened, with Michael scorching opponents from everywhere. He hoisted 1,202 total midrange attempts on the year, per NBA.com, 310 more than the next-highest guard by volume, Mitch Richmond. He was seventh of 99 guards attempting at least 150 midrange looks at 48.9 percent, trailing specialist-types like Mugsy Bogues, Dell Curry and teammate Steve Kerr.
But inside the arc is where the real magic happened, with Michael scorching opponents from everywhere. He hoisted 1,202 total midrange attempts on the year, per NBA.com, 310 more than the next-highest guard by volume, Mitch Richmond. He was seventh of 99 guards attempting at least 150 midrange looks at 48.9 percent, trailing specialist-types like Mugsy Bogues, Dell Curry and teammate Steve Kerr.
This post was edited on 4/25/17 at 12:42 pm
Posted on 4/25/17 at 12:41 pm to TbirdSpur2010
quote:
Wait....what?
Boom said 3pt% doesnt count against MJ because it was not part of the game
i was joking to show how dumb of an argument that is..
Posted on 4/25/17 at 12:43 pm to rocket31
Yeah I missed the context, my bad.
Posted on 4/25/17 at 12:44 pm to redfishfan
Better "shooter" All things considered is easily Jordan.
Posted on 4/25/17 at 12:44 pm to rocket31
quote:
its one of the sorriest memes around "mj is a better shooter than lebron"
It's not really a meme. Jordan shot 505 as a Bull. LeBron shoots 501 so far in his career. Jordan's career average is 497 due to the two years he played in Washington after a three-year retirement. They pretty much shoot the same, and Jordan shot higher in his prime, but by a narrow margin.
Posted on 4/25/17 at 12:46 pm to Baloo
quote:
It's not really a meme.
sure it is, and you just proved as much
MJ does not have a strong statistical advantage shooting so to suggest he is a better shooter is factually incorrect
This post was edited on 4/25/17 at 12:47 pm
Posted on 4/25/17 at 12:49 pm to TbirdSpur2010
quote:
If prime MJ and prime LBJ played concurrently in either era, LBJ would be the player you're more concerned about.
Agreed totally and emphatically.
If it weren't for Pop and the Spurs sweeping the young Lebron early in his career he would have had a championship when he wasn't even close to his peak as a player. Just scratching the surface at that time.
Posted on 4/25/17 at 12:49 pm to Boomshockalocka
quote:
Better "shooter" All things considered is easily Jordan.
Clearly
Posted on 4/25/17 at 12:51 pm to tigerskin
I won't. Unless he does. But he won't.
Posted on 4/25/17 at 12:52 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
i've gotten in 3 separate argument with black guys at the poker table about Lebron v. Kobe all brought up shooting. i said lebron was a better 3 point shooter. they laughed i pulled up stats on my phone. they said that didn't count some people you just can't argue with
It isn't that cut and dry. LeBron was better from 3pt range, they're very similar from 16ft to 3pt range (Kobe with the edge), and Kobe is better from 10-16 feet.
As someone else said, it goes back to shot selection. Kobe shot .388 on FGs from 10 feet or father, and 67% of his career shots came from there. LeBron shoots .364 from 10 feet or further, but only 53% of his shots come from there. Kobe is a better jump shooter, but LeBron is a smarter jump shooter when you consider his eFG% from 10ft or further is 43.1% while Kobe's is 44.1%.
Saying Kobe is a better shooter isn't really blasphemous.
Posted on 4/25/17 at 12:53 pm to rocket31
quote:
watching jordans era basketball is hilarious
lol...it's not like there werent rules on what defense you could play at the time.
Posted on 4/25/17 at 12:53 pm to rocket31
quote:
MJ does not have a strong statistical advantage shooting so to suggest he is a better shooter is factually incorrect
MJ is clearly the better shooter from mid range. I don't know how anybody can argue that.
Posted on 4/25/17 at 12:54 pm to Boomshockalocka
Jordan at 50% midrange.
Lebron is .428 3-10 ft
.363 10-16 ft
.386 16 ft +
Not even close
Lebron is .428 3-10 ft
.363 10-16 ft
.386 16 ft +
Not even close
Posted on 4/25/17 at 12:57 pm to reo45
quote:
it weren't for Pop and the Spurs sweeping the young Lebron early in his career he would have had a championship when he wasn't even close to his peak as a player. Just scratching the surface at that time.
Yup. Really only Pop has stood in his way.
Posted on 4/25/17 at 12:58 pm to CptBengal
quote:Right, which made things easier for a scorer then, compared to now. Obviously.
lol...it's not like there werent rules on what defense you could play at the time
Posted on 4/25/17 at 1:00 pm to Boomshockalocka
I truly can't understand how anyone can argue that Lebron is a better mid-range weapon that Jordan. It is not really a subjective measurement by any means. Jordan's mid-range game was absolutely ridiculous. He didn't shoot a high-amount of 3's and just destroyed you from 10-15 feet.
Lebron has nothing close to his arsenal offensively all-around. If he did, he would be the best to ever suit up.
No one is bashing Lebron by stating this either. No one. It is purely an objective measure having seen them both play through both of their entire careers.
Lebron has nothing close to his arsenal offensively all-around. If he did, he would be the best to ever suit up.
No one is bashing Lebron by stating this either. No one. It is purely an objective measure having seen them both play through both of their entire careers.
Posted on 4/25/17 at 1:00 pm to Boomshockalocka
quote:
Jordan at 50% midrange. Lebron is .428 3-10 ft .363 10-16 ft .386 16 ft + Not even close
You can't use midrange. It's not a part of the game today.
Posted on 4/25/17 at 1:03 pm to Boomshockalocka
quote:Where are you getting MJ's shooting data? Basketball Reference only goes back to 2001 so MJ's only includes his Washington stint (obviously as a lesser players.
Jordan at 50% midrange.
Lebron is .428 3-10 ft
.363 10-16 ft
.386 16 ft +
Not even close
During those 2 years he shot:
.329 3-10 ft
.430 10-16 ft
.417 16 ft +
Obvious his overall average is better, but since his overall shooting percentage in Chicago was 0.505, 0.520 from 2, it's hard to believe he shot 0.500 from midrange.
Posted on 4/25/17 at 1:03 pm to Boomshockalocka
quote:
The competition that Jordan faced and the competition that Lebron faced to get to the finals isn't close.
Hopefully we are in agreeance the NBA has never been more talented.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News