Started By
Message

re: At what point will you say Lebron is better than Jordan was?

Posted on 4/25/17 at 12:41 pm to
Posted by redfishfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2015
4425 posts
Posted on 4/25/17 at 12:41 pm to
quote:

Fg% doesn't determine who is the better shooter. Can't use The three point % Bc that shot wasn't a part of the game then like it is now. There' should be no debate on who was the better shooter of the two.


Lol MJ was unreal from midrange. LBJ is equal to or slightly better from 3.
Posted by Boomshockalocka
Member since Feb 2004
59710 posts
Posted on 4/25/17 at 12:41 pm to
Delving a little more deeply, Jordan carved out his largest niche in the 10-14 foot area. He attempted 466 shots within this range – second here was Grant Hill with 258 attempts, the only other guy to post even half of Jordan’s number. Michael’s 480 points scored on such shots is far and away the benchmark from this distance since NBA.com began their location tracking:


But inside the arc is where the real magic happened, with Michael scorching opponents from everywhere. He hoisted 1,202 total midrange attempts on the year, per NBA.com, 310 more than the next-highest guard by volume, Mitch Richmond. He was seventh of 99 guards attempting at least 150 midrange looks at 48.9 percent, trailing specialist-types like Mugsy Bogues, Dell Curry and teammate Steve Kerr.



This post was edited on 4/25/17 at 12:42 pm
Posted by rocket31
Member since Jan 2008
41819 posts
Posted on 4/25/17 at 12:41 pm to
quote:

Wait....what?



Boom said 3pt% doesnt count against MJ because it was not part of the game

i was joking to show how dumb of an argument that is..
Posted by TbirdSpur2010
ALAMO CITY
Member since Dec 2010
134026 posts
Posted on 4/25/17 at 12:43 pm to
Yeah I missed the context, my bad.
Posted by Boomshockalocka
Member since Feb 2004
59710 posts
Posted on 4/25/17 at 12:44 pm to
Better "shooter" All things considered is easily Jordan.
Posted by Baloo
Formerly MDGeaux
Member since Sep 2003
49645 posts
Posted on 4/25/17 at 12:44 pm to
quote:

its one of the sorriest memes around "mj is a better shooter than lebron"


It's not really a meme. Jordan shot 505 as a Bull. LeBron shoots 501 so far in his career. Jordan's career average is 497 due to the two years he played in Washington after a three-year retirement. They pretty much shoot the same, and Jordan shot higher in his prime, but by a narrow margin.
Posted by rocket31
Member since Jan 2008
41819 posts
Posted on 4/25/17 at 12:46 pm to
quote:

It's not really a meme.



sure it is, and you just proved as much

MJ does not have a strong statistical advantage shooting so to suggest he is a better shooter is factually incorrect
This post was edited on 4/25/17 at 12:47 pm
Posted by reo45
Member since Nov 2015
6362 posts
Posted on 4/25/17 at 12:49 pm to
quote:

If prime MJ and prime LBJ played concurrently in either era, LBJ would be the player you're more concerned about.


Agreed totally and emphatically.

If it weren't for Pop and the Spurs sweeping the young Lebron early in his career he would have had a championship when he wasn't even close to his peak as a player. Just scratching the surface at that time.
Posted by redfishfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2015
4425 posts
Posted on 4/25/17 at 12:49 pm to
quote:

Better "shooter" All things considered is easily Jordan.


Clearly
Posted by Breadstick Gun
Colorado Springs, CO
Member since Apr 2009
10177 posts
Posted on 4/25/17 at 12:51 pm to
I won't. Unless he does. But he won't.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
85389 posts
Posted on 4/25/17 at 12:52 pm to
quote:

i've gotten in 3 separate argument with black guys at the poker table about Lebron v. Kobe all brought up shooting. i said lebron was a better 3 point shooter. they laughed i pulled up stats on my phone. they said that didn't count some people you just can't argue with


It isn't that cut and dry. LeBron was better from 3pt range, they're very similar from 16ft to 3pt range (Kobe with the edge), and Kobe is better from 10-16 feet.

As someone else said, it goes back to shot selection. Kobe shot .388 on FGs from 10 feet or father, and 67% of his career shots came from there. LeBron shoots .364 from 10 feet or further, but only 53% of his shots come from there. Kobe is a better jump shooter, but LeBron is a smarter jump shooter when you consider his eFG% from 10ft or further is 43.1% while Kobe's is 44.1%.

Saying Kobe is a better shooter isn't really blasphemous.
Posted by CptBengal
BR Baby
Member since Dec 2007
71661 posts
Posted on 4/25/17 at 12:53 pm to
quote:

watching jordans era basketball is hilarious


lol...it's not like there werent rules on what defense you could play at the time.
Posted by redfishfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2015
4425 posts
Posted on 4/25/17 at 12:53 pm to
quote:

MJ does not have a strong statistical advantage shooting so to suggest he is a better shooter is factually incorrect


MJ is clearly the better shooter from mid range. I don't know how anybody can argue that.
Posted by Boomshockalocka
Member since Feb 2004
59710 posts
Posted on 4/25/17 at 12:54 pm to
Jordan at 50% midrange.

Lebron is .428 3-10 ft
.363 10-16 ft
.386 16 ft +

Not even close
Posted by TbirdSpur2010
ALAMO CITY
Member since Dec 2010
134026 posts
Posted on 4/25/17 at 12:57 pm to
quote:

it weren't for Pop and the Spurs sweeping the young Lebron early in his career he would have had a championship when he wasn't even close to his peak as a player. Just scratching the surface at that time.



Yup. Really only Pop has stood in his way.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
111208 posts
Posted on 4/25/17 at 12:58 pm to
quote:



lol...it's not like there werent rules on what defense you could play at the time
Right, which made things easier for a scorer then, compared to now. Obviously.
Posted by reo45
Member since Nov 2015
6362 posts
Posted on 4/25/17 at 1:00 pm to
I truly can't understand how anyone can argue that Lebron is a better mid-range weapon that Jordan. It is not really a subjective measurement by any means. Jordan's mid-range game was absolutely ridiculous. He didn't shoot a high-amount of 3's and just destroyed you from 10-15 feet.

Lebron has nothing close to his arsenal offensively all-around. If he did, he would be the best to ever suit up.

No one is bashing Lebron by stating this either. No one. It is purely an objective measure having seen them both play through both of their entire careers.
Posted by Goldrush25
San Diego, CA
Member since Oct 2012
33794 posts
Posted on 4/25/17 at 1:00 pm to
quote:

Jordan at 50% midrange. Lebron is .428 3-10 ft .363 10-16 ft .386 16 ft + Not even close


You can't use midrange. It's not a part of the game today.
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35250 posts
Posted on 4/25/17 at 1:03 pm to
quote:

Jordan at 50% midrange.

Lebron is .428 3-10 ft
.363 10-16 ft
.386 16 ft +

Not even close
Where are you getting MJ's shooting data? Basketball Reference only goes back to 2001 so MJ's only includes his Washington stint (obviously as a lesser players.

During those 2 years he shot:

.329 3-10 ft
.430 10-16 ft
.417 16 ft +


Obvious his overall average is better, but since his overall shooting percentage in Chicago was 0.505, 0.520 from 2, it's hard to believe he shot 0.500 from midrange.
Posted by Colonel Flagg
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2010
22841 posts
Posted on 4/25/17 at 1:03 pm to
quote:

The competition that Jordan faced and the competition that Lebron faced to get to the finals isn't close.


Hopefully we are in agreeance the NBA has never been more talented.
Jump to page
Page First 6 7 8 9 10 ... 47
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 8 of 47Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram