Started By
Message

re: 3rd Base coach for Royals should have waved him home...

Posted on 10/29/14 at 10:31 pm to
Posted by The Boat
Member since Oct 2008
164088 posts
Posted on 10/29/14 at 10:31 pm to
Two outs in game 7 bro.

You bust it to 1st. The center fielder stops the ball. alright. You made it 1st a little quicker than usual.

You gotta hustle.
Posted by Cap Crunch
Fire Alleva
Member since Dec 2010
54189 posts
Posted on 10/29/14 at 10:32 pm to
True

That would be a terrible ending for a world series though. Inside the park homerun on an error?
Posted by SouljaBreauxTellEm
Mizz
Member since Aug 2009
29343 posts
Posted on 10/29/14 at 10:34 pm to
Gordon was touching third by the time the relay guy got the ball to the cut off guy pretty deep away.. But Gordon was not really running well enough.. Who knows what kind of thrown would have happened there with the pressure mounting.. It would have been so exciting
This post was edited on 10/29/14 at 10:35 pm
Posted by hendersonshands
Univ. of Louisiana Ragin Cajuns
Member since Oct 2007
160104 posts
Posted on 10/29/14 at 10:34 pm to
No, he should not have.
Posted by The Boat
Member since Oct 2008
164088 posts
Posted on 10/29/14 at 10:36 pm to
Would have been terrible. But I wanted KC to win.
Posted by Golfer
Member since Nov 2005
75052 posts
Posted on 10/29/14 at 10:36 pm to
If that's Cain...they send him. But Cain is at 3rd on the bobble
Posted by Cap Crunch
Fire Alleva
Member since Dec 2010
54189 posts
Posted on 10/29/14 at 10:39 pm to
Me too, but the giants deserved to win. Well, at least Bumgarner did.
Posted by chalmetteowl
Chalmette
Member since Jan 2008
47531 posts
Posted on 10/30/14 at 2:39 am to
That would be an awesome ending lol
Posted by KBeezy
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2004
13529 posts
Posted on 10/30/14 at 4:49 am to
quote:

True

That would be a terrible ending for a world series though. Inside the park homerun on an error?



That would not have ended the worlds series

Instead we would have gotten a majorly dramatic ended in extras
Posted by GynoSandberg
Member since Jan 2006
71998 posts
Posted on 10/30/14 at 5:49 am to
Pretty sure Brandon Crawford got the relay? He has a good arm and is accurate as well

I thought for sure there would be a play at the plate after the bobble. Gordon isn't consiered slow, but it's been a long season. Idk. I expected him to try and score considering his athleticism
Posted by John Doe
NOLA
Member since Feb 2007
1949 posts
Posted on 10/30/14 at 6:45 am to
With any kind of accurate throw, game over.
Posted by KBeezy
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2004
13529 posts
Posted on 10/30/14 at 6:46 am to
He had his eyes on the outfield from the time he Left the box including after he rounded second

Should have been busting it eyes on third base coach

Still not sure if he makes it thouh
Posted by LSUBoo
Knoxville, TN
Member since Mar 2006
101915 posts
Posted on 10/30/14 at 7:11 am to
When the ball got past CF I was thinking triple... then Perez kicked it and I was really expecting a play at the plate, but Gordon is slow. Like said, he wasn't busting it out of the box or whatever, but he was getting to third about when the relay came in... if he had tried to score he would have been out by 40 feet on a good throw.

Tie game, maybe... but down by one you can't take that chance, have to hope your teammates can pick you up.
Posted by bbap
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2006
96007 posts
Posted on 10/30/14 at 7:26 am to
quote:

True

That would be a terrible ending for a world series though. Inside the park homerun on an error?



how many runs exactly do you think an inside the park homerun counts for?
Posted by OneMoreTime
Florida Gulf Coast Fan
Member since Dec 2008
61834 posts
Posted on 10/30/14 at 7:30 am to
He got out the box way too slow. If he's busting it the whole way, he wouldve had a good chance of scoring
Posted by ThePenIsMightier
Member since Jul 2006
9061 posts
Posted on 10/30/14 at 8:36 am to
Nate Silver agrees with you and Nate Silver generally knows his shite.

LINK

quote:

The point is that if even Gordon had been a 2-to-1 underdog to score, he should have tried.

These decisions can be counterintuitive. Sometimes a strategy that’s successful less than 50 percent of the time — like splitting eights in blackjack — is still the right move because the alternative is even worse. In this case, the alternative involved trying to score against Bumgarner with your catcher at the plate and two outs, and then having to prevail in extra innings.


quote:

It would have made for one of the best plays in baseball history. We’re talking about the tying run with two outs in the bottom of the ninth inning in Game 7 of the World Series: Even a sacrifice fly can be thrilling under those circumstances. But this would have been in a league with Bill Mazeroski and Kirk Gibson and Bill Buckner: under serious consideration for the greatest play of all-time. (The play already had a little Buckner in it, with Blanco’s and Perez’s misplays in the outfield.)

Unlike any of those moments, it would have involved an incredibly gutsy decision. It’s an extraordinary play if Gordon scores. It’s an extraordinary play if there’s a collision at home plate — and baseball needs to decide whether to invoke the “Buster Posey Rule.”

And if Gordon were thrown out, it would have been the most extraordinary way to lose a game in the history of baseball.
This post was edited on 10/30/14 at 8:37 am
Posted by RGJ18
Collierville, TN
Member since Feb 2010
8672 posts
Posted on 10/30/14 at 8:41 am to
quote:

He should've scored while the pop up foul ball was in the air

this
Posted by LSUBoo
Knoxville, TN
Member since Mar 2006
101915 posts
Posted on 10/30/14 at 8:51 am to
quote:

It’s an extraordinary play if there’s a collision at home plate — and baseball needs to decide whether to invoke the “Buster Posey Rule.”


A little bit of me was hoping for the Buster Posey Rule to end game 7 of the World Series with Buster Posey at catcher.
Posted by bbap
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2006
96007 posts
Posted on 10/30/14 at 8:56 am to
quote:

The point is that if even Gordon had been a 2-to-1 underdog to score, he should have tried.


you really think his odds were 2-1? Did you see how much he was laboring around 2nd?

I'd put it more at about 20-1.
Posted by RedHawk
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2007
8842 posts
Posted on 10/30/14 at 10:09 am to
quote:

Did you see how much he was laboring around 2nd?

I'd put it more at about 20-1.


This! At 2-1 it is a no-brainer. I think that if the 3rd base coach even thought there was a chance, that he would have sent Gordon. If it was Cain, he might have even sent him cause the pressure for a good throw would have been higher. With Gordon, chances are the catcher is standing with the ball waiting for Gordon and then there is a pickle situation.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram