Started By
Message
locked post

So, maybe we should force people to pay for stuff...

Posted on 9/29/08 at 1:15 pm
Posted by Chicken
Jackassistan
Member since Aug 2003
22011 posts
Posted on 9/29/08 at 1:15 pm
with their own money. People who now can't afford their payments will have to rent. Homes that have lost their value can sell to someone at their new value.

What is wrong with that?
Posted by Kolbysfan
Tennessee
Member since Jun 2007
1825 posts
Posted on 9/29/08 at 1:15 pm to
thats racist
Posted by Colonel Hapablap
Mostly Harmless
Member since Nov 2003
28791 posts
Posted on 9/29/08 at 1:16 pm to
bankers who have lost money will have to admit it...
Posted by Chicken
Jackassistan
Member since Aug 2003
22011 posts
Posted on 9/29/08 at 1:16 pm to
Racist? This affected all races.


Posted by lashinala
End of 565
Member since Jan 2006
5716 posts
Posted on 9/29/08 at 1:17 pm to
How dare you!
That's pretty radical, man.
Posted by CurDog
Member since Jan 2007
28082 posts
Posted on 9/29/08 at 1:21 pm to
i try to buy things with cash. if i dont i pay off the credit card the next month. what made me mad about this hole bailout crap is if i was to go bellie up no one would be there bail me out. i would be forced to bail myself out.

the govt hands out to much damn money.
Posted by Kolbysfan
Tennessee
Member since Jun 2007
1825 posts
Posted on 9/29/08 at 1:22 pm to
By STEVEN A. HOLMES

Published: September 30, 1999

In a move that could help increase home ownership rates among minorities and low-income consumers, the Fannie Mae Corporation is easing the credit requirements on loans that it will purchase from banks and other lenders.

The action, which will begin as a pilot program involving 24 banks in 15 markets -- including the New York metropolitan region -- will encourage those banks to extend home mortgages to individuals whose credit is generally not good enough to qualify for conventional loans. Fannie Mae officials say they hope to make it a nationwide program by next spring.

Fannie Mae, the nation's biggest underwriter of home mortgages, has been under increasing pressure from the Clinton Administration to expand mortgage loans among low and moderate income people and felt pressure from stock holders to maintain its phenomenal growth in profits.


In addition, banks, thrift institutions and mortgage companies have been pressing Fannie Mae to help them make more loans to so-called subprime borrowers. These borrowers whose incomes, credit ratings and savings are not good enough to qualify for conventional loans, can only get loans from finance companies that charge much higher interest rates
-- anywhere from three to four percentage points higher than conventional loans.

''Fannie Mae has expanded home ownership for millions of families in the 1990's by reducing down payment requirements,'' said Franklin D. Raines, Fannie Mae's chairman and chief executive officer. ''Yet there remain too many borrowers whose credit is just a notch below what our underwriting has required who have been relegated to paying significantly higher mortgage rates in the so-called subprime market.''

Demographic information on these borrowers is sketchy. But at least one study indicates that 18 percent of the loans in the subprime market went to black borrowers, compared to 5 per cent of loans in the conventional loan market.

In moving, even tentatively, into this new area of lending, Fannie Mae is taking on significantly more risk, which may not pose any difficulties during flush economic times. But the government-subsidized corporation may run into trouble in an economic downturn, prompting a government rescue similar to that of the savings and loan industry in the 1980's.

''From the perspective of many people, including me, this is another thrift industry growing up around us,'' said Peter Wallison a resident fellow at the American Enterprise Institute. ''If they fail, the government will have to step up and bail them out the way it stepped up and bailed out the thrift industry.''

Under Fannie Mae's pilot program, consumers who qualify can secure a mortgage with an interest rate one percentage point above that of a conventional, 30-year fixed rate mortgage of less than $240,000 -- a rate that currently averages about 7.76 per cent. If the borrower makes his or her monthly payments on time for two years, the one percentage point premium is dropped.

Fannie Mae, the nation's biggest underwriter of home mortgages, does not lend money directly to consumers. Instead, it purchases loans that banks make on what is called the secondary market. By expanding the type of loans that it will buy, Fannie Mae is hoping to spur banks to make more loans to people with less-than-stellar credit ratings.

Fannie Mae officials stress that the new mortgages will be extended to all potential borrowers who can qualify for a mortgage. But they add that the move is intended in part to increase the number of minority and low income home owners who tend to have worse credit ratings than non-Hispanic whites.

Home ownership has, in fact, exploded among minorities during the economic boom of the 1990's. The number of mortgages extended to Hispanic applicants jumped by 87.2 per cent from 1993 to 1998, according to Harvard University's Joint Center for Housing Studies. During that same period the number of African Americans who got mortgages to buy a home increased by 71.9 per cent and the number of Asian Americans by
46.3 per cent.

In contrast, the number of non-Hispanic whites who received loans for homes increased by 31.2 per cent.

Despite these gains, home ownership rates for minorities continue to lag behind non-Hispanic whites, in part because blacks and Hispanics in particular tend to have on average worse credit ratings.

In July, the Department of Housing and Urban Development proposed that by the year 2001, 50 percent of Fannie Mae's and Freddie Mac's portfolio be made up of loans to low and moderate-income borrowers. Last year, 44 percent of the loans Fannie Mae purchased were from these groups.

The change in policy also comes at the same time that HUD is investigating allegations of racial discrimination in the automated underwriting systems used by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to determine the credit-worthiness of credit applicants.
Posted by silstang23
Bossier City, LA
Member since Oct 2007
4957 posts
Posted on 9/29/08 at 1:51 pm to
quote:

with their own money. People who now can't afford their payments will have to rent. Homes that have lost their value can sell to someone at their new value. What is wrong with that?


Nothing wrong with that at all. People shouldn't have been living beyond their means in the first place.
Posted by back9Tiger
Mandeville, LA.
Member since Nov 2005
14145 posts
Posted on 9/29/08 at 2:20 pm to
non-regulated, the investment market being non regulated makes it prime for greed which has gotten us to where we are today.
Posted by Chicken
Jackassistan
Member since Aug 2003
22011 posts
Posted on 9/29/08 at 2:26 pm to
ok, Rahm Emanuel just said that they want to reduce the principle owed by the home owner of those troubled mortgages...that somehow, if they are able to keep making payments, the taxpayer will get a return on the government's investment in these crappy assets.

What is the guarantee that the home owners will still be able to make payments? Are they going to audit every home owner stuck in this mess and figure out what they can afford?

This isn't just a bailout of Wall Street...it is also a bailout of people that shouldn't have been able to get a mortgage in the first place.

We are going to let people foreclose on the same property TWICE?
Posted by MikeBRLA
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2005
16460 posts
Posted on 9/29/08 at 2:27 pm to
Posted by silstang23
Bossier City, LA
Member since Oct 2007
4957 posts
Posted on 9/29/08 at 2:31 pm to
Never seen that before. Funny stuff!!
Posted by Lou
Modesto, CA
Member since Aug 2005
8286 posts
Posted on 9/29/08 at 3:44 pm to
quote:

Never seen that before. Funny stuff!!
It's the basic premise of any Dave Ramsey book. He gets bashed on this board - but if more people followed his advice, we certainly wouldn't be in the mess we're in right now.

I.E., everyone puts 20% down on a 15 year fixed loan, only gets a house where their monthly payment is 25% of monthly net income, pays cash for everything else...

Although I don't agree with everything he says it's hard to argue with the results.
Posted by Bubba Bexley
Member since May 2007
3579 posts
Posted on 9/29/08 at 3:47 pm to
quote:

pays cash for everything else...


if that happened, you'd probably have a whole bunch of jobless people out there as a result. Each side of that debate has its issues. Realistically, people carrying debt and carrying it responsibly is what it takes to make the world go around.
Posted by tigeralum06
Member since Oct 2007
2788 posts
Posted on 9/29/08 at 8:42 pm to
quote:

Realistically, people carrying debt and carrying it responsibly is what it takes to make the world go around.


fail.

Posted by sabbertooth
A Distant Planet
Member since Sep 2006
5276 posts
Posted on 9/29/08 at 8:49 pm to
IF the economy gets slammed how are the people that pay their mortgages, taxes and bills gonna pay now??????
I have worked hard my entire life. I pay my bills, taxes and have a retirement plan( for what that is worth now). I am the one getting F'd now.
Posted by Bubba Bexley
Member since May 2007
3579 posts
Posted on 9/30/08 at 7:30 am to
quote:

Posted by Message
tigeralum06

fail.


If you're basing that on a national rather than individual level, you're a complete idiot.
Posted by Herb
Amite LA
Member since Dec 2003
6528 posts
Posted on 9/30/08 at 8:20 am to
Credit is absolutely essential for our economy. Without it, we're back in the stone age.
Posted by supatigah
CEO of the Keith Hernandez Fan Club
Member since Mar 2004
87439 posts
Posted on 9/30/08 at 8:33 am to
quote:

Fannie Mae, the nation's biggest underwriter of home mortgages, has been under increasing pressure from the Clinton Administration to expand mortgage loans among low and moderate income people and felt pressure from stock holders to maintain its phenomenal growth in profits.


quote:

In moving, even tentatively, into this new area of lending, Fannie Mae is taking on significantly more risk, which may not pose any difficulties during flush economic times. But the government-subsidized corporation may run into trouble in an economic downturn, prompting a government rescue similar to that of the savings and loan industry in the 1980's.

''From the perspective of many people, including me, this is another thrift industry growing up around us,'' said Peter Wallison a resident fellow at the American Enterprise Institute. ''If they fail, the government will have to step up and bail them out the way it stepped up and bailed out the thrift industry.''


there it is in a nutshell

quote:

In July, the Department of Housing and Urban Development proposed that by the year 2001, 50 percent of Fannie Mae's and Freddie Mac's portfolio be made up of loans to low and moderate-income borrowers. Last year, 44 percent of the loans Fannie Mae purchased were from these groups.

The change in policy also comes at the same time that HUD is investigating allegations of racial discrimination in the automated underwriting systems used by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to determine the credit-worthiness of credit applicants.


and there is the reason the Dems fought to keep regulators at bay: vote buying
Posted by morgcl
nor east fl
Member since Dec 2007
926 posts
Posted on 9/30/08 at 8:38 am to
i think if we had done that 50 years ago it would be fine. the country grew too fast on credit and thats why we are where we are at now. in the toilet with all the credit that the usa owes.

why is growing bigger always the solution. i like small towns with small businesses.
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram