- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: LSU featured on college football live on ESPN
Posted on 5/25/12 at 1:50 am to Billder
Posted on 5/25/12 at 1:50 am to Billder
I'm still at a loss to understand why so many of the people posting these, "I hate ESPN!" or "ESPN HATES LSU!!" threads clearly watch so much ESPN. People, that network sucks unless you are a fan of a huge market interest team, which includes any good L.A., New York, Boston or Chicago program, or any proven national market draw from a smaller market area (like Notre Dame and Alabama football, or Duke or Kentucky basketball). LSU isn't quite there at the moment (though we've been flirting with it over the last decade or so), so as an LSU fan there is essentially zero reason to watch anything on ESPN besides game broadcasts and highlight reels. Any "analysis" featured will be filtered through the agenda of pandering to the market.
The feature they did on LSU today was pretty positive and respectful, so they are clearly viewing LSU as a player in a national market interest plotline. But having seen/heard their "analysis" of SC and Bama, it's pretty obvious LSU's role on their networks will be that of foil to whichever of the "elite teams" we face/lose to.
Again, the tl;dr version is very simple: if you don't like ESPN, don't watch it. Your remote will take you to other channels, and the internet will take you to even more (MUCH more) interesting content that isn't connected to ESPN.
The feature they did on LSU today was pretty positive and respectful, so they are clearly viewing LSU as a player in a national market interest plotline. But having seen/heard their "analysis" of SC and Bama, it's pretty obvious LSU's role on their networks will be that of foil to whichever of the "elite teams" we face/lose to.
Again, the tl;dr version is very simple: if you don't like ESPN, don't watch it. Your remote will take you to other channels, and the internet will take you to even more (MUCH more) interesting content that isn't connected to ESPN.
Posted on 5/25/12 at 1:59 am to loweralabamatrojan
quote:Wow. An SC fan admonishing someone else about "haven't earned anything"? If I could think of a team (and fans) who've gotten more acclaim, love and fanfare and doing less to earn it, I'd be surprised. Winning one Championship (and cheating to do it) and "dominating" a pre-Oregon rise PAC-10 is about as impressive as Vandy going 4-4 in the SEC. The only teams SC has managed to put together that could hang with the top teams in the SEC were bought and paid for with a brashness and audacity that would make Auburn blush.
recognize you haven't earned anything yet
The fact that so many Trojan fans are so obsessed with LSU that they can't help but stay glued to our board (despite the fact we haven't played in football since crushing the shite out of them in their own house over 25 years ago) is all the evidence needed for how pathetic they are.
Posted on 5/25/12 at 2:22 am to loweralabamatrojan
quote:
but if you want to start chest thumping before a game has been played and say "we deserve to be #1" you just look silly. No matter who your team is.
Preseason Champions! where can I buy the tshirt?
Posted on 5/25/12 at 2:24 am to King Joey
quote:
Wow. An SC fan admonishing someone else about "haven't earned anything"? If I could think of a team (and fans) who've gotten more acclaim, love and fanfare and doing less to earn it, I'd be surprised.
Well, consider this. USC is in a media fishbowl, in the middle of Los Angeles. It cuts both ways. Surprised?
quote:
Winning one Championship (and cheating to do it) and "dominating" a pre-Oregon rise PAC-10 is about as impressive as Vandy going 4-4 in the SEC.
Year Coach Selector Record Bowl
1928 Howard Jones Dickinson System 9-0-1 -
1931 Howard Jones Helms, CFRA, NCF 10-1 Won Rose
1932 Howard Jones Helms, CFRA, NCF 10-0 Won Rose
1939 Howard Jones Dickinson System 8-0-2 Won Rose
1962 John McKay AP, FWAA, NFF, UPI 11-0 Won Rose
1967 John McKay AP, FWAA, NFF, UPI 10-1 Won Rose
1972 John McKay AP, FWAA, NFF, UPI 12-0 Won Rose
1974 John McKay FWAA, NFF, UPI 10-1-1 Won Rose
1978 John Robinson UPI 12-1 Won Rose
2003 Pete Carroll AP, FWAA 12-1 Won Rose
2004 Pete Carroll AP, BCS(vacated), FWAA (vacated) 11-0 Won Orange (vacated)
Total national championships 11
Looks like you missed about 10 of those USC National Championships.
quote:
The only teams SC has managed to put together that could hang with the top teams in the SEC were bought and paid for with a brashness and audacity that would make Auburn blush.
Really? Which players did anyone associated with USC buy or pay for?
quote:TD is a great sports message board. And I'll admit that I've been wondering exactly what the hell makes you people tick ever since I witnessed that LSU vs. USC game in the Coliseum in 84. But you'll recall that famous victory by the Trojans in Tiger Stadium in 1979 and realize that we are even at 1-1. As far as "pathetic" goes, well that's subjective. Forgive me if my feelings aren't hurt.
The fact that so many Trojan fans are so obsessed with LSU that they can't help but stay glued to our board (despite the fact we haven't played in football since crushing the shite out of them in their own house over 25 years ago) is all the evidence needed for how pathetic they are.
This post was edited on 5/25/12 at 2:46 am
Posted on 5/25/12 at 3:01 am to bulldog95
quote:
Reggie bush.
Too easy. Reggie Bush was paid (or rather his family was given housing benefits) by an agent who wanted Bush to sign with him in return. He wanted Reggie to leave USC. He wasn't paying anyone for him to stay or play there.
Next?
Posted on 5/25/12 at 3:22 am to loweralabamatrojan
but why coerce McKnight on a 3 way with "coach" when he was a Saint?
Posted on 5/25/12 at 3:46 am to loweralabamatrojan
quote:No ESPN.
1928
quote:No ESPN.
1931
quote:No ESPN.
1932
quote:No ESPN.
1939
quote:No ESPN.
1962
quote:No ESPN.
1967
quote:No ESPN.
1972
quote:No ESPN.
1974
quote:No ESPN.
1978
quote:No Championship.
2003
quote:Counted it, and noted cheating.
2004
quote:Looks like you missed the part where this thread was about ESPN hyping teams. I guess they don't have context in lower Alabama?
Looks like you missed about 10 of those USC National Championships
quote:Judging from the infraction report, at least Reggie Bush, O.J. Mayo, two other student athletes and some tennis chick. LINK
Really? Which players did anyone associated with USC buy or pay for?
At least one assistant coach was cited as knowing about the violations with regard to Bush and lying about them, which is involvement in the process (the coverup is part of the infraction). And the guys who hired Bush and the other two athletes improperly, and the guy who paid Mayo (as well as the athletic department employee who let the tennis chick use a long distance card to call a foreign country 123 times to the tune of $7,000+) were all representatives of the university's athletic interests. That means they were all associated with USC. And that's just the ones that were proven irrefutably.
quote:I'll take your word that you think so.
TD is a great sports message board
quote:Yes, I do recall it. And we are even. But neither of those has ever tempted me to troll SC's message boards like an insecure middle-schooler who feels the need to constantly remind the "cool" kids that he's cool, too.
But you'll recall that famous victory by the Trojans in Tiger Stadium in 1979 and realize that we are even at 1-1.
Posted on 5/25/12 at 3:51 am to loweralabamatrojan
quote:Oh, I see. "It's okay for SC's players to get tons of cash in benefits, because they were gonna go there and stay there anyway. Really, I swear!"
He wasn't paying anyone for him to stay or play there
Bush's coach(es) knew about the money and lied about it. They lied because they knew the money was coming all along. It's a decades old scam that was cliche when the Bear was doing it before it was really illegal;
"I'm the coach, son. I can't pay you to play football at SC. But, hey, look at those people over there! Why don't you go talk to them and see what they have to say to you, if you play for SC?"
The coaching staff knew about it and lied. The moment they found out, they had a responsibility to report it, and remove him from playing (since he was ineligible). The fact that they let him keep getting the money, and played him knowing he was getting paid, IS paying a player to play for you.
Posted on 5/25/12 at 3:54 am to King Joey
Back of dawg KJ, it isnt fair to kick one when he's down
Posted on 5/25/12 at 3:55 am to King Joey
quote:
Winning one Championship (and cheating to do it) and "dominating" a pre-Oregon rise PAC-10 is about as impressive as Vandy going 4-4 in the SEC.
This is great spin, but you didn't qualify your championships as "in the ESPN era" which began right after USC won it's 1978 Championship. Also, the 2003 split NC happened. The BCS recognizes it as a split and many of your more rational Tiger fans do as well.
As far as trying to tie OJ Mayo and a "tennis chick" to USC football?
Go back to your definition of context.
Posted on 5/25/12 at 3:56 am to loweralabamatrojan
quote:Oh, and as for this piece of bullshite, Reggie was paid lots of money, much of it in hard cash. Again, everyone should refresh their memory on this periodically.
Reggie Bush was paid (or rather his family was given housing benefits)
(Paragraph B.1.a(4) of Section III, for this specific reference)
Posted on 5/25/12 at 3:59 am to loweralabamatrojan
quote:Uh, no it's not. An agent, hell that's glorifying him. A convicted felon who wanted to be an agent, and his shady bag man was making a deal with Reggie's greedy stepfather.
The coaching staff knew about it and lied. The moment they found out, they had a responsibility to report it, and remove him from playing (since he was ineligible). The fact that they let him keep getting the money, and played him knowing he was getting paid, IS paying a player to play for you.
Reggie should have reported it but didn't. I am sure he knew. As far as the coaches? I can't say for certain whether any of them knew what was going on. San Diego is 100 miles away from USC, so it's not like it was under their noses.
You really need to check your facts there, KJ.
Posted on 5/25/12 at 4:07 am to King Joey
quote:
Oh, and as for this piece of bullshite, Reggie was paid lots of money, much of it in hard cash. Again, everyone should refresh their memory on this periodically. (Paragraph B.1.a(4) of Section III, for this specific reference)
I am familiar with the report. What it fails to mention was that these conclusions were reached based on the testimony of convicted felon Lloyd Lake.
You might buy it, the NCAA certainly did, and I am not so naive as to think that Reggie Bush (along with MANY other high profile athletes where CF is king) did not receive benefits he shouldn't have.
But Lake is a crook. Not an NCAA violator although he certainly contributed to that, but a bona fide felon. His motive was nothing more than a shakedown of Bush, who didn't comply, and so the beans (both the fabricated and the factual) were spilled.
You might gobble that NCAA report hook, line and sinker, but I don't.
Posted on 5/25/12 at 4:09 am to loweralabamatrojan
quote:I didn't bring up our championships. But, yes, 2 of ours are in that era. In the last decade, in fact.
you didn't qualify your championships as "in the ESPN era"
quote:Consensus equals neither truth nor fact. Never has, never will. The moment the BCS came into existence in 1998, there existed for the first time in major college football a National Championship based directly (to some degree) on the results of games played on the field. At that moment, championships "awarded" by polls became as relevant as national championships awarded by polls in the NFL, NBA, college basketball, college baseball, Div. 1AA football, NHL, etc., etc. I don't care if you (or ESPN, or the BCS, or anyone else, or everyone else) claims otherwise. Opinion is not at issue, here, thus neither is consensus. One championship is won by winning on the field. Championships that are "awarded" by popularity are meaningless in a discussion of what is "earned".
Also, the 2003 split NC happened. The BCS recognizes it as a split and many of your more rational Tiger fans do as well
quote:The context is pretty clear, just as it was to the NCAA. SC won it's National Championship by cheating as part of a general culture of cheating in athletics at the university. The same principles that led to boosters paying off Mayo led to Bush getting bunches of money and other benefits with the coach's and the associate AD's approvals.
As far as trying to tie OJ Mayo and a "tennis chick" to USC football?
Go back to your definition of context
But even if you want to pretend they are relevant in some effort to "be real", then we'd have to bring in the rest of the discussion involving all the allegations that weren't proven. Like Mike Williams getting free rent (again, with the coach's knowledge), for example. If you want to exclude them based on the "context" that they were never sanctioned by the NCAA for that, then you have to accept that Mayo and the tennis chick are related within that same "context".
Posted on 5/25/12 at 4:13 am to King Joey
KJ, remind me to never tangle with you
Posted on 5/25/12 at 4:18 am to loweralabamatrojan
quote:Yes you can. It's in the report:
As far as the coaches? I can't say for certain whether any of them knew what was going on.
quote:Page 2, Section III, paragraph B-1
Further, the assistant football coach knew or should have known that
student-athlete 1 and agency partners A and B were engaged in violations that negatively
affected student-athlete 1's amateurism status. The assistant football coach provided false
and misleading information to the enforcement staff concerning his knowledge of agency
partner A's and B's activity and also violated NCAA legislation by signing a document
certifying that he had no knowledge of NCAA violations.
And, again, pretending that Reggie wasn't paid is total bullshite. He was handed money, himself, in cash. He bought stuff for the car with it. And since he had asked them for the money for the car himself, the fact they delivered it to him through his stepfather is hardly even a smokescreen.
quote:You need to bullshitting about the cheating you Trojans were caught doing redhanded.
You really need to check your facts there, KJ.
Read the report, it's all in there. That's the facts, and I've checked them.
Posted on 5/25/12 at 4:23 am to King Joey
Your an attorney I assume? If not, you should be
Posted on 5/25/12 at 4:31 am to loweralabamatrojan
quote:I see. So the facts ascertained by the NCAA investigators over years of investigation are all pure manufactured lies because one of the people involved is not a credible witness. But your version is the pure, unassailable, unvarnished truth because it is based 100% on the word of Reggie Bush . . . clearly an unbiased party with absolutely no reason whatsoever to fabricate, mislead, or lie about what went on in this situation. I guess O.J. really didn't do anything wrong, either, right? (Mayo, not the other one)
You might gobble that NCAA report hook, line and sinker, but I don't.
Somehow, I'm not surprised. The difference between us is that when my school does something bad, I'm pissed off at the people that did it, not the people who caught us. And I don't pretend like it didn't happen, or we didn't do it, or there's some big conspiracy out to get us. We paid Lester Earl. And it was a terrible thing to do. And it was stupid and wrong. And were punished for it. I grumbled that the punishment was a bit stiffer than it should have been, but I never tried to minimize what we did.
Bush was paid. He was paid in cash, among lots of other benefits. The coach knew about it, and let him keep playing. That is cheating on close to the highest order in the NCAA. If that had been the only violation, it would have warranted major sanctions. But it wasn't. It was neither the only violation for the football program nor the only sport in which there were violations. SC was cheating rampantly across the board, and doing so while already under probation. And instead of accepting that, and owning up to the major cheating your team team used to win its championship, you just keep making up lies and excuses.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News