- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 11/26/17 at 11:03 am to burke985
quote:
Just don't get hopes up that is the likely scenario than throwing millions at another top coordinator for him to leave in a year
Wait, I thought the whole argument for Orgeron was that we save money on him and pay top dollar for coordinators?
Posted on 11/26/17 at 11:05 am to LSURussian
quote:
He was clearly referring to the interim job for the bowl game. Chill
Link?
Posted on 11/26/17 at 11:09 am to TigerDat
quote:
Link?
quote:LINK
Orgeron addressed the future of his offensive coordinator, even mentioning a potential interim replacement for Canada, presumably, if he were to leave between now and the Tigers’ bowl game.
"If people leave, we have guys like (tight ends coach) Steve Ensminger who I’d highly consider."
Posted on 11/26/17 at 11:14 am to Solo Cam
quote:
You mean to tell me that LSU promised to go get the best in the country but instead they’re gonna promote from within to someone who’s under qualified?
I don't think he's under qualified per say. I think he's at least competent at the job, but he sure as hell isnt exciting or who I'd want going forward.
Posted on 11/26/17 at 11:17 am to LSURussian
quote:
Orgeron addressed the future of his offensive coordinator, even mentioning a potential interim replacement for Canada, presumably, if he were to leave between now and the Tigers’ bowl game.
"If people leave, we have guys like (tight ends coach) Steve Ensminger who I’d highly consider."
That's not O saying it that's a reporter guessing as are all of you.
All O said is that they have Ensminger who they will consider. Nowhere did he mention the bowl game
Posted on 11/26/17 at 11:19 am to TigerDat
quote:Catastrophe Syndrome on full display!
That's not O saying it that's a reporter guessing as are all of you.
All O said is that they have Ensminger who they will consider. Nowhere did he mention the bowl game
ETA: The reporter was in the room when Orgeron was explaining the situation if Canada left so I'd say that reporter is in a better position to know what the meaning was than any drama queens on this board, especially those here who look for anything to get upset about.....
The actual question that was asked that Orgeron was answering after saying Canada wants a HC job may have been, "What will you do for the bowl game if Coach Canada leaves before then?" We don't know if that was the question but clearly the reporter who was in the room heard the question and believed Orgeron was referring to the interim OC position before the bowl game.
This post was edited on 11/26/17 at 11:25 am
Posted on 11/26/17 at 11:20 am to burke985
This makes no logical sense. Who would coach QBs? It's not like they are growing QB developers on trees who aren't signal callers.
Posted on 11/26/17 at 11:22 am to TigerDat
quote:
All O said is that they have Ensminger who they will consider. Nowhere did he mention the bowl game
Where did he say it wasn't for just the bowl game?
Posted on 11/26/17 at 11:22 am to LSURussian
quote:
Catastrophe Syndrome on full display!
Not here. Just stateing facts.
Gonna wait and see before I decide if it's a catastrophic event or not
Posted on 11/26/17 at 11:26 am to noonan
quote:
Where did he say it wasn't for just the bowl game
Well if you read my whole post you will understand I said the reporter was guessing as are all of us here.
Also most people talking about a specific event will reference it you know like saying he would consider him in the interim or for the bowl game.
Not discerning between bowl game and permanent just leaves it open to interpretation, which is what everyone here is doing
Posted on 11/26/17 at 11:29 am to noonan
quote:
Where did he say it wasn't for just the bowl game?
The most rational approach here is to make the fewest assumptions. If he didn't say interim why would you interject that?
Posted on 11/26/17 at 11:37 am to Goldrush25
quote:
The most rational approach here
Not on the rant. Rational thought is considered catastrophe syndrome
Posted on 11/26/17 at 11:38 am to TigerDat
quote:
Also most people talking about a specific event will reference it you know like saying he would consider him in the interim or for the bowl game.
I think if he was looking at the long term replacement he wouldn't be mentioning names. I think y'all are reaching here.
Posted on 11/26/17 at 11:39 am to TigerDat
He didn't say interim and he didn't say bowl game and those are facts.
Posted on 11/26/17 at 11:42 am to burke985
My main problem with the Orgeron experiment was the dependence on an OC creating instability. Gonna be hard to maintain QB recruiting and development with a revolving door at OC.
Posted on 11/26/17 at 11:44 am to Goldrush25
quote:
The most rational approach here is to make the fewest assumptions.
So we should assume he's talking long term?
Like I said, that's a bigger reach than saying he's talking about the bowl game.
Posted on 11/26/17 at 11:45 am to burke985
quote:
e didn't say interim and he didn't say bowl game and those are facts
You are 100% correct but people here insist that's wht he said or meant even though none of is know.
I can only judge what is presented, and what was presented is that O would strongly consider Ensminger
Posted on 11/26/17 at 11:46 am to DBU
quote:
Would be awful
Didn’t Ensminger set records with the same offense that got Miles and Cam fired?
Posted on 11/26/17 at 11:47 am to noonan
quote:
So we should assume he's talking long term?
Like I said, that's a bigger reach than saying he's talking about the bowl game.
Well when I discuss hiring with my bosses it is assumed long term unless otherwise stated.
So the smallest reach would be long term.
Page 4 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News