- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Better Pro RB: Scott or Keiland
Posted on 8/28/09 at 12:41 pm to cggeaxtigers
Posted on 8/28/09 at 12:41 pm to cggeaxtigers
quote:
Yup. There's more to being an RB than YPC. Wearing down the D is also important.
Scott = Deuce. Everyone needs a back like that in the NFL.
0
Posted on 8/28/09 at 12:43 pm to OBUDan
quote:
You do realize he's 235 pounds, right?
Make me a list of 235 RBs in the league.
Lendale White is one. What would you call him?
explain why 235 = good nfl rb?
like i said, he may be a bruiser in college, but he's not going to be mowing down linebackers in the nfl.
Posted on 8/28/09 at 12:45 pm to SouthOfSouth
quote:
Scott is a bruiser. Every NFL team needs a bruiser
Posted on 8/28/09 at 12:47 pm to harper6464
quote:
explain why 235 = good nfl rb?
like i said, he may be a bruiser in college, but he's not going to be mowing down linebackers in the nfl.
Explain to me where I said 235 = good nfl rb?
You said he won't be a bruiser in the NFL because presumably, he's not big enough?
He weighs 235. As much as post-tequila Lendale White. Who is known as... a bruiser. And he's shorter than White, so more compact.
My point is that there's only one 270 pound bruiser in the NFL - Brandon Jacobs.
If you look at almost every other "bruiser" they are Scott's size. And if you look at Scott's mentality... he runs with a lot of physicality. It's why he was worn down at the end of the last year and his production slowed.
Posted on 8/28/09 at 12:48 pm to OTIS2
quote:
OTIS2
hates blacks
Posted on 8/28/09 at 12:51 pm to Maximus
quote:Fixed it.
quote:
OTIS2
knows Maxipus is a dick
Posted on 8/28/09 at 12:52 pm to OBUDan
ok, charles scott will be a bruiser style runner in the nfl.
but he'll be an inferior pro to keiland.
but he'll be an inferior pro to keiland.
Posted on 8/28/09 at 12:55 pm to Babalugats
Scott isn't fast enough?!!! LOL at the loony myths on message boards. 
Posted on 8/28/09 at 12:57 pm to cggeaxtigers
Keiland, I think he is more versatile. I see Scott in the NFL as a Deuce, run up the middle and hurt someone.
Posted on 8/28/09 at 12:58 pm to Chad504boy
CS
Posted on 8/28/09 at 1:11 pm to harper6464
quote:
but he'll be an inferior pro to keiland.
Only if Keiland goes to a team where the RBs run directly to the sideline then try to cut upfield. This will be new to NFL Linebackers.
This post was edited on 8/28/09 at 1:11 pm
Posted on 8/28/09 at 1:14 pm to Sammich
quote:
Only if Keiland goes to a team where the RBs run directly to the sideline then try to cut upfield. This will be new to NFL Linebackers
your right. there are no count the zero elusive backs in the nfl.
Posted on 8/28/09 at 1:17 pm to Chad504boy
quote:
Cue LSUballs to say Richard Murphy
Richard Murphy /thread.
Posted on 8/28/09 at 1:21 pm to Sammich
if you can't see how keiland has more potential that charles scott just give up, this thread is about who can be the better pro and its never going to make sense to you.
This post was edited on 8/28/09 at 1:23 pm
Posted on 8/28/09 at 1:22 pm to DBG
quote:
Better pro potential? Definitely keiland
Posted on 8/28/09 at 1:23 pm to Sammich
quote:
Sammich
so much hate and ignorance for one little man
Did you tell everyone why you had to change your name from Tiger Tap yet?
Posted on 8/28/09 at 1:26 pm to harper6464
quote:
your right. there are no count the zero elusive backs in the nfl.
Your sentence makes no sense. But I think you are trying to say Keiland elusive.
Please explain how a RB, any running back, gets dropped for a 14 yard Loss on a running play.
Posted on 8/28/09 at 1:28 pm to Sammich
quote:That's a lot of eluding.
Please explain how a RB, any running back, gets dropped for a 14 yard Loss on a running play.
Posted on 8/28/09 at 1:28 pm to Sammich
quote:
Your sentence makes no sense. But I think you are trying to say Keiland elusive.
Please explain how a RB, any running back, gets dropped for a 14 yard Loss on a running play.
i assume your trying to say keiland only runs side to side and backwards? (which is childish)
plese explain how keiland has broken off numerous 20+yd carries
Posted on 8/28/09 at 1:28 pm to Sammich
Just to clarify, I"m not saying Keiland won't be a good pro, but to say that he definitely has more NFL potential than Scott is SFPtarded.
Page 4 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News