Started By
Message

re: Better Pro RB: Scott or Keiland

Posted on 8/28/09 at 10:51 am to
Posted by Sammich
Member since Apr 2004
9375 posts
Posted on 8/28/09 at 10:51 am to
quote:

he may be a bruiser in college, he's oversized in college. once he gets to the nfl the only thing he's going to bruise is the bench


Like Beanie Wells?
Posted by harper6464
baton rouge
Member since Jan 2007
8121 posts
Posted on 8/28/09 at 10:54 am to
im pretty sure beanie is superior to scott in just about everyway. strength and speed being the first two theat come to mind.
Posted by DBG
vermont
Member since May 2004
71523 posts
Posted on 8/28/09 at 10:58 am to
Every scout leading up to draft pretty much called Wells a pussy

McShay said he's the softest player he's ever seen with an injury
Posted by Sammich
Member since Apr 2004
9375 posts
Posted on 8/28/09 at 10:59 am to
quote:

im pretty sure beanie is superior to scott in just about everyway. strength and speed being the first two theat come to mind.


Beanie's not strong. Beanie's not fast. You are not smart.
Posted by harper6464
baton rouge
Member since Jan 2007
8121 posts
Posted on 8/28/09 at 11:01 am to
guess that explains why their 08 stats were very similar despite beanie missing 3 games and effected by that injury all year.

the cardinals disagree by the way...

they used their 1st pick on him.
Posted by bmy
Nashville
Member since Oct 2007
48203 posts
Posted on 8/28/09 at 11:03 am to
Scott will probably go in the 2nd-3rd round..

LINK

Excellent site that has excellent information. Projected 1-2nd round.

LINK

Projected 1st round.

FYI These sites are usually accurate.
This post was edited on 8/28/09 at 11:06 am
Posted by harper6464
baton rouge
Member since Jan 2007
8121 posts
Posted on 8/28/09 at 11:05 am to
i didnt say beanie was the fastest, i just said beanie is faster than scott.

beanie also did 25 reps at the combine and had a 10'8 broad...
Posted by loussenile
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
758 posts
Posted on 8/28/09 at 11:06 am to
Where is that dude who would throw in RM?
Posted by DBG
vermont
Member since May 2004
71523 posts
Posted on 8/28/09 at 11:06 am to
I'm not disagreeing with you about Scott

I'm just saying Well is soft...and being the 3rd RB taken in a weak RB draft doesn't impress me, FYI
Posted by harper6464
baton rouge
Member since Jan 2007
8121 posts
Posted on 8/28/09 at 11:08 am to
quote:

FYI These sites are usually accurate.


signed, brady quinn, aaron rogers etc...
Posted by bmy
Nashville
Member since Oct 2007
48203 posts
Posted on 8/28/09 at 11:09 am to
quote:


signed, brady quinn, aaron rogers etc...


yes yes, we know.. there are exceptions to every rule. what was your point again? that these sites are (as I said) usually accurate.
This post was edited on 8/28/09 at 11:10 am
Posted by LSUownsSEC
OutOfTheArea
Member since May 2008
3178 posts
Posted on 8/28/09 at 11:10 am to
How many times does this have to be said?

It's just another HYPOTHETICAL QUESTION!!!

They have to get there first
Posted by harper6464
baton rouge
Member since Jan 2007
8121 posts
Posted on 8/28/09 at 11:16 am to
quote:

I'm just saying Well is soft...and being the 3rd RB taken in a weak RB draft doesn't impress me, FYI


i cant imagine a team using a 1st round pick on a player who they thought was soft and injury prone basically to be their #1 running option.
This post was edited on 8/28/09 at 11:18 am
Posted by harper6464
baton rouge
Member since Jan 2007
8121 posts
Posted on 8/28/09 at 11:17 am to
quote:

yes yes, we know.. there are exceptions to every rule. what was your point again? that these sites are (as I said) usually accurate.


so we agree they're innacurate. what was your point again?
Posted by TigerTatorTots
The Safeshore
Member since Jul 2009
80765 posts
Posted on 8/28/09 at 11:18 am to
KW
Posted by Sammich
Member since Apr 2004
9375 posts
Posted on 8/28/09 at 11:18 am to
quote:

the cardinals disagree by the way...

they used their 1st pick on him.


Could you post Beanie's "Awesome" NFL stats for all to see?
Posted by DBG
vermont
Member since May 2004
71523 posts
Posted on 8/28/09 at 11:22 am to
There wasn't really any other option for the cardinals, except for trading down

and Tim hightower is their #1 back
Posted by harper6464
baton rouge
Member since Jan 2007
8121 posts
Posted on 8/28/09 at 11:23 am to
you do understand that he's a rookie this year right?

and you do realize the total irrelevance of the preseason stats he may or may not have accumulated right?

MIKE BELL RAN FOR 100+YARDS AGAINS THE TEXANS OMGZZZZZZ! HE'S A BETTER RB THAN PIERRE AND REGGIE!!!
Posted by bmy
Nashville
Member since Oct 2007
48203 posts
Posted on 8/28/09 at 11:24 am to
quote:


so we agree they're innacurate. what was your point again?


usually accurate != inaccurate

closet gump? because you can't read.
This post was edited on 8/28/09 at 11:25 am
Posted by bmy
Nashville
Member since Oct 2007
48203 posts
Posted on 8/28/09 at 11:25 am to
quote:


MIKE BELL RAN FOR 100+YARDS AGAINS THE TEXANS OMGZZZZZZ! HE'S A BETTER RB THAN PIERRE AND REGGIE!!!


He is a better RB than reggie
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram