- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: FCC plans to vote to overturn U.S. net neutrality rules in December
Posted on 11/17/17 at 9:01 am to StraightCashHomey21
Posted on 11/17/17 at 9:01 am to StraightCashHomey21
quote:
Its bad if NN goes away bc ISPs can make certain aspects of the internet unusable.
Like what? And what changes from what we have currently? I have no idea about this
Posted on 11/17/17 at 9:02 am to StraightCashHomey21
quote:
Nothing I said is a fake scare tactic.
Posted on 11/17/17 at 9:03 am to Centinel
quote:
You do realize there are private toll roads in the US correct?
That is what I'm referring to.
Yes, but they are almost never the exclusive route between two points.
Posted on 11/17/17 at 9:06 am to cahoots
quote:
Ive lived in multiple big cities and I've never had more than two realistic options for internet
Then you are lying or have a weird definition of realistic
Posted on 11/17/17 at 9:07 am to cave canem
quote:
Yes, but they are almost never the exclusive route between two points.
Neither are ISPs.
Posted on 11/17/17 at 9:07 am to StraightCashHomey21
quote:You think Google, Facebook, Twitter, etc. don't do this already? We should regulate them too, right?
restricting traffic will lead to censorship, esp of publications that certain ISPs think don't agree with their political views.
Posted on 11/17/17 at 9:08 am to GeorgeTheGreek
quote:
There goes Kodi
If your ISP is a cable company far more than Kodi is going to be throttled.
Do you recon Cox might want to slow down say Netflix, Hulu, etc, and pimp their own service or lets say CBS buys one and decides to put the screws on the SEC network to improve their own ratings?
Posted on 11/17/17 at 9:10 am to StraightCashHomey21
quote:
Then you should know we don't have a free market with ISPs....
Um..........I revert back to my original response to you regarding your understanding of the term free market.
Posted on 11/17/17 at 9:11 am to DarthRebel
quote:
Then you are lying or have a weird definition of realistic
What do you mean? most areas just have AT&T and then a cable provider (Cox, Time Warner, etc) What are the other realistic options for a regular broadband connection?
Posted on 11/17/17 at 9:11 am to cave canem
quote:
The vast majority of folks have far less realistic options, satellite and cellular are not very viable for most.
Let's talk about vast majority
quote:
U.S. Cities are Home to 62.7 Percent of the U.S. Population, but Comprise Just 3.5 Percent of Land Area
quote:
Rural areas cover 97 percent of the nation’s land area but contain 19.3 percent of the population (about 60 million people)
Google census for your links.
There are talking points and then there are actual facts.
Posted on 11/17/17 at 9:12 am to joshnorris14
That dude is such a hack
Posted on 11/17/17 at 9:13 am to cave canem
Kodi will be unusable. That will literally be broken for all Kodi users.
Russian must work for the FCC. I already pay for internet. Why should I pay more for YouTube or to stream Netflix? It doesn't cost the provider any more to give me access to that content than it does CNN.com.
Russian must work for the FCC. I already pay for internet. Why should I pay more for YouTube or to stream Netflix? It doesn't cost the provider any more to give me access to that content than it does CNN.com.
Posted on 11/17/17 at 9:13 am to Halftrack
this situation pisses me off
government has fricked with the markets so much that various levels created mini-monopolies and then the market gets blamed when it faces an uphill battle to correct the problem
this is possibly the perfect argument to reference in future discussions of government interference, b/c we see how terrible the results are
government has fricked with the markets so much that various levels created mini-monopolies and then the market gets blamed when it faces an uphill battle to correct the problem
this is possibly the perfect argument to reference in future discussions of government interference, b/c we see how terrible the results are
Posted on 11/17/17 at 9:14 am to ShortyRob
quote:They think “free” market means “don’t have to pay”.
Um..........I revert back to my original response to you regarding your understanding of the term free market.
Should a person be able to demand a full page ad in a newspaper under “print neutrality”? Maybe they should demand TV stations run their shows under “broadcast neutrality”?
Posted on 11/17/17 at 9:15 am to cahoots
quote:
realistic options for a regular broadband connection
And that is the problem right there. High speed broadband is the Cadillac of service. You think you are entitled to best of the best, like it is a right in the Constitution.
People being able to stream videos on youtube, facebook, etc. is not a freaking right.
Posted on 11/17/17 at 9:16 am to Taxing Authority
And quite frankly the bigger story... is congress relaxing the last vestiges of media ownership rules. You know the media companies the statists think the FCC will regulate...
But...mug net neutrality!
Posted on 11/17/17 at 9:16 am to DarthRebel
quote:
Let's talk about vast majority
and most major cities you still only have a couple options.....
Usually Cox and Comcast
Posted on 11/17/17 at 9:16 am to GeorgeTheGreek
The ISP shouldn't be charging you more to use specific websites. But, for a guy like me in the stone age who pretty much uses the internet for message boards and email, I don't think it's unreasonable for the ISP to charge a family of six streaming TV and movies all day more than me. You wanna cut that cord? Well, there's a price.
This post was edited on 11/17/17 at 9:19 am
Posted on 11/17/17 at 9:18 am to cahoots
quote:Simple question. Why wouldn’t those single service areas charge $10,000/mo. for basic service?
most areas just have AT&T and then a cable provider (Cox, Time Warner, etc) What are the other realistic options for a regular broadband connection?
This post was edited on 11/17/17 at 9:19 am
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News