Started By
Message

re: How would an NFL team in London even work?

Posted on 9/16/15 at 11:27 am to
Posted by KindaRaw
Member since Jun 2014
3963 posts
Posted on 9/16/15 at 11:27 am to
Which will never happen. I'm sure the majority of players don't want to have to move out of the country just to do their jobs. Seems pointless.
Posted by SportsGuyNOLA
New Orleans, LA
Member since May 2014
17264 posts
Posted on 9/16/15 at 11:28 am to
It's not really a question of "will it work or not".

Goodell wants it, so it's going to happen.

There really isnt much a travel time difference between East Coast teams going to London or Seattle, yet I dont hear anyone bitching about why we have an NFL team in Seattle.

How many road West Coast games would this London team play a year? One? Maybe two?

The travel excuse for not having a team in London is bogus.

Posted by SwaggerCopter
H TINE HOL IT DINE
Member since Dec 2012
27233 posts
Posted on 9/16/15 at 11:30 am to
Now that Tottenham Hotspur is linked with the NFL, I am becoming more open to the idea. I'm not sure we'd get the team though, as we tend to have a lot of Sunday Premier League games due to Europa League on Thursdays.
Posted by sms151t
Polos, Porsches, Ponies..PROBATION
Member since Aug 2009
139889 posts
Posted on 9/16/15 at 11:31 am to
quote:


Thats the issue. That team is fricked. No one wants to play on that team. No one wants to coach that team.



You could not be any more wrong. People would want to play and coach there.
Posted by bigpetedatiga
Alexandria, LA
Member since Aug 2009
8631 posts
Posted on 9/16/15 at 11:31 am to
It would work horribly!

You don't seem them trying to be a soccer team across the globe!

Posted by WeeWee
Member since Aug 2012
40232 posts
Posted on 9/16/15 at 11:32 am to
quote:

How would an NFL team in London even work?
Would they play the first 8 games on the road all in the US and then the last 8 in London, and have a facility in the US?

Or would they have a normal schedule, and just basically be guaranteed to never be good due to travel constraints?


Really are you too dense to figure it out? All you have to do is build a practice center that is big enough for 2 teams or build 2 practice centers or work out a deal with one of the many pro soccer teams and use their facilites for the visiting team. Have a visting team play an east coast team and then play to London after that game. Spend the week and practice in London and then fly home. It should not be a major problem unless it is a west coast team in which case you let them play on monday night the following week so they have an extra day to get over jet lag. The flight from Miami to Seattle is 7 hours. London to any east coast city is 8-9hrs and london to dallas is 10 hours and London to Chicago is 9 hours and these are flights on charter jets its not like they are flying Spirit or anything.


Then keep up the US practice facility of the relocating team and schedule 2-3 week road trips when they play in the US.
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
145338 posts
Posted on 9/16/15 at 11:35 am to
quote:

There really isnt much a travel time difference between East Coast teams going to London or Seattle
it's like a full hour longer. Not to mention how much longer it will be when the league tries to get onto the continent
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
84944 posts
Posted on 9/16/15 at 11:40 am to
quote:

Really are you too dense to figure it out? All you have to do is build a practice center that is big enough for 2 teams or build 2 practice centers or work out a deal with one of the many pro soccer teams and use their facilites for the visiting team. Have a visting team play an east coast team and then play to London after that game. Spend the week and practice in London and then fly home. It should not be a major problem unless it is a west coast team in which case you let them play on monday night the following week so they have an extra day to get over jet lag. The flight from Miami to Seattle is 7 hours. London to any east coast city is 8-9hrs and london to dallas is 10 hours and London to Chicago is 9 hours and these are flights on charter jets its not like they are flying Spirit or anything.


Then keep up the US practice facility of the relocating team and schedule 2-3 week road trips when they play in the US.


All this plus London gets a bye the week before each of their two trips to the states.
Posted by Sevendust912
Member since Jun 2013
11367 posts
Posted on 9/16/15 at 11:45 am to
quote:

There really isnt much a travel time difference between East Coast teams going to London or Seattle, yet I dont hear anyone bitching about why we have an NFL team in Seattle.


It's a different country though. Most people don't want to move to a different country/culture when there are opportunities with 30+ other teams in the states.
Posted by SoDakHawk
South Dakota
Member since Jun 2014
8639 posts
Posted on 9/16/15 at 11:48 am to
You all are forgetting about teams going through customs, players with criminal backgrounds being allowed into the country, the effect of earning money overseas on players on away teasm traveling to play there. International travel to Canada is one thing, overseas is another.

I'm sure the details could be worked out but the player's association will (should) resist this. The NFLPA is already loading up for bear and going to go to war with Goodell the way it is, does the NFL really want to put this on the table too?

Especially considering before the NFL expanding to Europe there are cities in North America that would be interested in teams, Toronto and Montreal in Canada to name two, and probably a few more located here in the U.S. that could support teams.
Posted by Teddy Ruxpin
Member since Oct 2006
39640 posts
Posted on 9/16/15 at 11:48 am to
quote:

You could not be any more wrong. People would want to play and coach there.


Don't project your willingness to do it onto the players. I'd jump at the chance, but if I recall correctly, the players were not on board when asked.

You have to remind yourself where they come from. The idea of living internationally is not appealing to people from that background. Plus moving family members who REALLY wouldn't want to go. Yikes

But as always, money talks and bullshite walks. They will go if shown the money.
This post was edited on 9/16/15 at 11:52 am
Posted by Palm Beach Tiger
Orlando, Florida
Member since Jan 2007
29879 posts
Posted on 9/16/15 at 11:49 am to
I personally do not think it would be as bad as people on here are saying. Its a 6 hour flight to the northeast. The games would sell out. And london is a world mega city that would be getting a shiny new toy. The endorsement deals alone should attract big stars that have any brains.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
85464 posts
Posted on 9/16/15 at 11:50 am to
quote:

While I agree, there are also a bunch of teams out there who need this. I wish a team of accountants and economists could make fair salary caps in all leagues.


I agree on the surface, but there are inequalities in damn near every variable that comes into free agency.

For instance, should Miami get a downward adjustment to their cap for no state income taxes, another downward adjustment for being in Miami in general, but then an upward adjustment for having to play in a 28 year old stadium?

Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
84944 posts
Posted on 9/16/15 at 11:50 am to
quote:

Especially considering before the NFL expanding to Europe there are cities in North America that would be interested in teams, Toronto and Montreal in Canada to name two, and probably a few more located here in the U.S. that could support teams.


the long term growth is in foreign markets.
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
162289 posts
Posted on 9/16/15 at 11:51 am to
quote:

Would they play the first 8 games on the road all in the US and then the last 8 in London, and have a facility in the US?


That would make the most sense

But you could argue they'd have a significant home field advantage.

Only way I could see it working would be they play 8 games in the U.S. (and would have to have a facility here), have a bye week after week 8 and return to London.

To make it fair to the other teams they would only play there after their own bye week on a Friday or Saturday to give them ample time to return home.

Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
85464 posts
Posted on 9/16/15 at 11:51 am to
I think Montreal, Toronto, or Calgary will get a team before London, despite no evidence that the NFL is leaning that direction.

I know Canada has the CFL, but I liken Canada getting an NFL team to the US getting an English Premiere League team - people would flock to the superior product.
This post was edited on 9/16/15 at 11:57 am
Posted by Dr. Jones
Member since Jun 2013
160 posts
Posted on 9/16/15 at 11:53 am to
London? No shot. Canada? Maybe.
Posted by Teddy Ruxpin
Member since Oct 2006
39640 posts
Posted on 9/16/15 at 11:53 am to
I'm somewhat curious about the reports of supersonic flights being reintroduced. If that were to happen, probably a decade at best from now, that issue gets a bit easier.

But right now the technology is just too expensive and too loud, but that will change some day.
This post was edited on 9/16/15 at 11:55 am
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
84944 posts
Posted on 9/16/15 at 11:55 am to
quote:

London? No shot


it's definitely going to happen, it's just a question of when.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
111235 posts
Posted on 9/16/15 at 11:57 am to
I hope it happens.

Whether it works or fails horribly, it'll be great to watch.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram