Started By
Message

re: Avengers AOU Tomatometer Watch Thread - 79%

Posted on 4/23/15 at 11:45 am to
Posted by biglego
Ask your mom where I been
Member since Nov 2007
76517 posts
Posted on 4/23/15 at 11:45 am to
quote:

James Spader, another living, breathing reason we need a special award for voice work and casting

Marvel really does a great job with casting.
Posted by abellsujr
New England
Member since Apr 2014
35296 posts
Posted on 4/23/15 at 12:46 pm to
81% now.
Posted by RonBurgundy
Whale's Vagina(San Diego)
Member since Oct 2005
13302 posts
Posted on 4/23/15 at 1:00 pm to
This is what happens with the most hyped films-it becomes cool to bash them.
Posted by abellsujr
New England
Member since Apr 2014
35296 posts
Posted on 4/23/15 at 1:37 pm to
quote:

This is what happens with the most hyped films-it becomes cool to bash them.
Tell me something I don't know.
Posted by jcole4lsu
The Kwisatz Haderach
Member since Nov 2007
30922 posts
Posted on 4/23/15 at 1:42 pm to
quote:

He also called Captain America Winter Solider franchise filler so

I think Winter Soldier is my litmus test. If you didn't think that was a great Comic/Action flick, then I just can't take your opinion seriously.
Posted by abellsujr
New England
Member since Apr 2014
35296 posts
Posted on 4/23/15 at 1:48 pm to
That's the first thing I look at, too. I saw one negative reviewer who gave a positive review to Cap 2, but they didn't exactly praise it. I have yet to see a negative review that I will take very seriously. One talked about some story inconsistencies that I will judge for myself when I see it.
This post was edited on 4/23/15 at 4:38 pm
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
108972 posts
Posted on 4/23/15 at 1:58 pm to
quote:

I've read that this film is darker and has tons of destruction. I'll be interested to see if posters blast this film just as much as they did MOS.



It's the second film in the franchise, and Ultron is a much darker, more fricked up, more intelligent, more ruthless, and can cast a much wider net of destruction than Zod could alone. If Ultron doesn't wipe out a few hundred thousand people (really million) and set up the Civil War, then I'm going to be disappointed. Luke unleashed Vader in his full violent form. Batman unleashed the Joker. These are the types of villains and situations you unleash once the hero wins in the first one, not something you start off with.

You don't go right out of the gate with a level of destruction like MoS did, destruction I would remind you Superman is very much indirectly responsible for. If this was the second film and it's acknowledged (which judging from the previews it is in this movie), then I'm fine with it. It's just clear to me that all Goyer and Snyder did with MoS is make it the exact opposite of Superman Returns, and really they succeeded in that. That is a bad thing though, since it's ridiculously violent to a ridiculous extent and then completely ignored except when it comes to a family of 4.
Posted by BilJ
Member since Sep 2003
158781 posts
Posted on 4/23/15 at 2:04 pm to
Hell most of the "negative" reviews seem to be "well it wasn't as good as the first one...." ok but does that make it a bad movie? Then you also have the types who are sick of these movies and will bash regardless, but not sure why they're even bothering to do a review. "Hey I hate sushi, so here's my review of the latest sushi joint in town..."
Posted by Fewer Kilometers
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2007
36098 posts
Posted on 4/23/15 at 2:06 pm to
quote:

This is what happens with the most hyped films-it becomes cool to bash them.
Or they genuinely didn't like the movie.

These movies aren't perfect. And Avengers movies don't have any room for character development. It's basically "bring the characters from a bunch of other movies into one movie and have them do as much cool stuff as possible in two hours". (Which can be extremely entertaining.)

Not every reviewer is going to review this as the awesome video game / comic book that it is. Some will hold it accountable to being a great movie on its own.

And keep in mind that Avatar made a gazillion dollars and has an 83% rating. That was the furthest thing from a great movie and some critics called Cameron on it. Yet everyone and their mother saw it and liked it based on the effects and experience.
Posted by RonBurgundy
Whale's Vagina(San Diego)
Member since Oct 2005
13302 posts
Posted on 4/23/15 at 2:25 pm to
quote:

These movies aren't perfect. And Avengers movies don't have any room for character development.


I agree with you, however the grapevine says Hawkeye is fully fleshed out this go around.

As far as the big 3* going forward what happens in their solo films (although civil war fricks up this notion) should reshape the character(while of course standing on it's own),then with the next Avengers film, the audience should understand where those 3 are coming from while the other Avengers really get the meat of development...and then those events shape the big 3s following film.

This is kind of what they've been doing, but if rumored that 1 of the Phase 2 films is being retconned out in a ways then the solo films lose emphasis.


*and by big 3 it's Rogers,Stark and Thor
Posted by Freauxzen
Utah
Member since Feb 2006
37401 posts
Posted on 4/23/15 at 4:27 pm to
quote:

This is what happens with the most hyped films-it becomes cool to bash them.


I only think this is true for a very small set of myopic people (honestly, I don't think we do it around here). For most, they might actually dislike the movie. This could really harm discussion, best not to categorize critique that way.
Posted by Fewer Kilometers
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2007
36098 posts
Posted on 4/23/15 at 4:32 pm to
So if you take out the percentage of critics that are bashing this movie to be cool, then what should the rating be? 99%? It's the best movie ever made?

85% seems pretty damn good. Go around your office and see if 85% of the people there cared enough to even see the last Avengers movie.
Posted by Freauxzen
Utah
Member since Feb 2006
37401 posts
Posted on 4/23/15 at 4:35 pm to
??

quote:

So if you take out the percentage of critics that are bashing this movie to be cool, then what should the rating be? 99%? It's the best movie ever made?

85% seems pretty damn good. Go around your office and see if 85% of the people there cared enough to even see the last Avengers movie.


quote:

For most, they might actually dislike the movie.


I'm saying that some people just don't like the film. And that's ok? No need to say they do it to be cool.
Posted by Proximo
Member since Aug 2011
15576 posts
Posted on 4/23/15 at 6:59 pm to
I didn't care for the first Avengers but I am into the "darker" tone of say TDK series. Hopefully I'll like this one, then.

Iron Man 1 and CA:WS I enjoyed too--but the others were meh.

Different tastes I guess. After all the negative reviews MOS got, I think maybe reviewers like to bash on the darker tones these days. It was certainly better than 50% or whatever it was--maybe it was the preconceived notions of what a Superman movie should be.
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
65147 posts
Posted on 4/23/15 at 8:15 pm to
Down to 79% now.
Posted by StateMan25
Member since Apr 2015
15 posts
Posted on 4/23/15 at 8:34 pm to
BOMB
Posted by WicKed WayZ
Louisiana Forever
Member since Sep 2011
31624 posts
Posted on 4/23/15 at 8:41 pm to
Damn, Joss dropped the ball on this one
Posted by schexyoung
Deaf Valley
Member since May 2008
6535 posts
Posted on 4/23/15 at 10:19 pm to
From a film critic stance, I could see how most comic book movies and especially Marvel's wouldn't be considered a "high quality" film. Marvel has done a fantastic job of bringing a comic book universe to live-action. Their movies may not have the most thought provoking themes or deep stories, but they are fun as hell to watch, family friendly, and make a boat load of cash. Why should Marvel or any comic-book fan care if the rating is at 60 or 80?

I'll be there opening weekend, and more importantly at an Alamo.
Posted by saintsfan22
baton rouge
Member since May 2006
71762 posts
Posted on 4/23/15 at 10:22 pm to
30 mil opening weekend
Posted by abellsujr
New England
Member since Apr 2014
35296 posts
Posted on 4/23/15 at 10:25 pm to
quote:

From a film critic stance, I could see how most comic book movies and especially Marvel's wouldn't be considered a "high quality" film. Marvel has done a fantastic job of bringing a comic book universe to live-action. Their movies may not have the most thought provoking themes or deep stories, but they are fun as hell to watch, family friendly, and make a boat load of cash. Why should Marvel or any comic-book fan care if the rating is at 60 or 80?
Cap 2 had a really good and interesting story, IMO. I would also say that it's a high quality film.
This post was edited on 4/23/15 at 10:26 pm
Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 10
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 10Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram