Started By
Message

re: Report: Toronto, Seattle, Quebec City to join Las Vegas in 2017 NHL expansion

Posted on 8/27/14 at 1:47 am to
Posted by JG77056
Vegas baby, Vegas
Member since Sep 2010
12065 posts
Posted on 8/27/14 at 1:47 am to
Yeah my bad, I was thinking of the MLS stadium they want to build downtown.

I still don't know that we'd have a ton of local fan support but it'll be an interesting experiment to see what entertainment options people choose.
Posted by UltimateHog
Oregon
Member since Dec 2011
65981 posts
Posted on 8/27/14 at 1:50 am to
They wouldn't need a ton of local fan support, just a nice core dedicated fan base and the rest will be filled with tourists wanting to catch a hockey game while in town and fans of other teams.

I think it would go over quite well overall from an attendance/attraction standpoint.

Bettman is finally doing something right.
Posted by Buckeye Backer
Columbus, Ohio
Member since Aug 2009
9273 posts
Posted on 8/27/14 at 5:58 am to
While i absolutely think Toronto could support another NHL franchise, i dont know if its a good move. I think there are markets out there that could absolutely support the NHL. Also, while Las Vegas is an untapped market for pro sports, the NHL should have been last on that list. It could end up being worse then Phoenix and Florida in terms of support. Really bad move there. Quebec and Seattle are slam dunks no brainers. The league did well there. Overall i say a C grade. I think the league should have considered the following markets for expansion over Toronto and Vegas:

Portland
Utah
Saskatchewan/Regina
Omaha
Boise
Green Bay...yup you read these last two right!
Posted by KillerNut9
Pearl Jam
Member since Dec 2007
33514 posts
Posted on 8/27/14 at 6:12 am to
A hockey team in Seattle would be amazing.
Posted by UltimateHog
Oregon
Member since Dec 2011
65981 posts
Posted on 8/27/14 at 6:13 am to
I think Vegas will do well, but we'll see.
Posted by pvilleguru
Member since Jun 2009
60453 posts
Posted on 8/27/14 at 6:35 am to
This sounds like a disaster. There's already too many guys in the league that shouldn't be. The NHL doesn't need expansion, just relocation.
Posted by SpartyGator
Detroit Lions fan
Member since Oct 2011
75673 posts
Posted on 8/27/14 at 6:49 am to
The Vegas one is kinda meh, but I like the other 3. Excited about the Seattle team.
Posted by dj30
New Orleans
Member since Feb 2006
28743 posts
Posted on 8/27/14 at 7:04 am to
The Maple Leafs no longer exist?

Eta: Nevermind
This post was edited on 8/27/14 at 7:08 am
Posted by Wally Sparks
Atlanta
Member since Feb 2013
29305 posts
Posted on 8/27/14 at 7:06 am to
quote:

come back to atlanta


frick the Atlanta Spirit Group
Posted by cjared036
Houston, tx
Member since Dec 2009
9569 posts
Posted on 8/27/14 at 7:07 am to
Houston!
Posted by Buckeye Backer
Columbus, Ohio
Member since Aug 2009
9273 posts
Posted on 8/27/14 at 8:25 am to
quote:

Houston!


Less teams in the South, more in the North and Canada. This Vegas experiment will fail. Nobody in Vegas plays or knows anything about Hockey. This has Phoenix and Florida written all over it.
Posted by ClydeFrog
Kenya
Member since Jul 2012
3261 posts
Posted on 8/27/14 at 8:26 am to
Seattle is a fantastic choice for a US hockey city.
Posted by Buckeye Backer
Columbus, Ohio
Member since Aug 2009
9273 posts
Posted on 8/27/14 at 8:38 am to
Seattle - 3.4 Million
Quebec - 765k

The NHL should have considered these cities over Vegas and Toronto IMO:


Portland - 2.3 Million
Salt Lake/Utah - 1.14 Million
Regina/Saskatchewan - 1.1 Million
Omaha - 895K
Boise - 650k

The best thing about these markets is that they arent tapped out. There would be plenty of support to go around for a team in these cities. I think sometimes, cities can be over represented in pro sports. I think we need more cities with only 1-2 franchises. 4-5 franchises in one city, regardless of size, doesnt always guarantee success.


Posted by SirWinston
PNW
Member since Jul 2014
82712 posts
Posted on 8/27/14 at 8:45 am to
The NBA is idiotic for letting the NHL get the jump on the Seattle and Vegas markets. Just idiotic.

Those are both basketball cities who will now likely be turned into hockey cities. And if you've never lived in a city with both NHL and NBA teams, there is a palpable difference between the two. Not as many overlap as fans of both teams as you might think.
This post was edited on 8/27/14 at 8:47 am
Posted by Teddy Ruxpin
Member since Oct 2006
39628 posts
Posted on 8/27/14 at 9:34 am to
quote:

The NBA is idiotic for letting the NHL get the jump on the Seattle and Vegas markets. Just idiotic.



If there was a franchise I wouldn't want to own it's the Vegas one. Not only fan support, but that town can turn into a ghost town in any given decade. It's a mirage of a "city." I went there in 2012 and you could see how badly overbuilt they were from the recession. Look at Atlantic City. While Vegas has a better pedigree, it doesn't take much to topple over a city like it.
This post was edited on 8/27/14 at 9:35 am
Posted by TXGunslinger10
Houston, TX
Member since Jun 2011
17996 posts
Posted on 8/27/14 at 9:57 am to
Dammit come on. Give one to Houston
Posted by Veritas
Raleigh, NC
Member since Feb 2005
6403 posts
Posted on 8/27/14 at 10:11 am to
If my expansion team from NHL14 is in any indication, the Seattle Shockers will be a force to be reckoned with.

Posted by NorthshoreTiger76
Pelicans, Saints, & LSU Fan
Member since May 2009
80275 posts
Posted on 8/27/14 at 11:06 am to
No New Orleans???? boooooooo
Posted by Baloo
Formerly MDGeaux
Member since Sep 2003
49645 posts
Posted on 8/27/14 at 11:12 am to
4 expansion teams? They need two to even up the divisions, but they probably should add 2 teams and move 2 (Phoenix and Miami). Those two just don't seem like viable markets, even after all of this time.

Toronto has needed two teams for a long time, and giving Quebec a team back rights a historic wrong. Bring back the Nordiques!

Seattle and Vegas are also great calls on expansion, and beats the NBA to the punch. Looking forward to the future Seattle-Vancouver rivalry.
Posted by Mizzeaux
Worshington
Member since Jun 2012
13894 posts
Posted on 8/27/14 at 11:17 am to
quote:

If there was a franchise I wouldn't want to own it's the Vegas one. Not only fan support, but that town can turn into a ghost town in any given decade. It's a mirage of a "city." I went there in 2012 and you could see how badly overbuilt they were from the recession. Look at Atlantic City. While Vegas has a better pedigree, it doesn't take much to topple over a city like it.



Vegas is anything but overbuilt, if anything it's a little underbilt in the city (meaning the place outside of The Strip and Downtown where the 2 million people, including myself, live.) There aren't many empty homes or apartments unless they're in foreclosure. Inventory is low and the city is starting to build again. The Fountainbleau that's been half built for five years is the only real failure in the tourist areas, and I imagine that will either get torn down or completed within the next few years.

I do agree on the ghost town thing, it's a single industry city, but that is changing. Las Vegas is a big city to not have a pro franchise of some sort, and I think the city will really get behind a hockey franchise, much like San Jose, but with casinos and resort money instead of high tech money.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram