- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Should Poor people have "Less Vote" than Rich people?
Posted on 7/20/14 at 1:37 pm to dcrews
Posted on 7/20/14 at 1:37 pm to dcrews
Yeah. It's a fairly ridiculous position.
But it does make sense to me that if someone can (in effect) vote more taxes for "that dude over there" then everyone's goes up.
But it does make sense to me that if someone can (in effect) vote more taxes for "that dude over there" then everyone's goes up.
Posted on 7/20/14 at 1:37 pm to Crow Pie
quote:
Should Poor people have "Less Vote" than Rich people?
Should poor people have less rights than rich people?
Posted on 7/20/14 at 1:37 pm to dcrews
I support abolishing the income tax so for all intents and purposes most of these people would not be paying any taxes anyway.
Posted on 7/20/14 at 1:38 pm to Darth_Vader
Yeah! And all the non-landowners can count as 3/5 of a person towards representation. This is a brilliant idea that's never been considered or tried before.
I swear nobody on this board ever took a US History class.
I swear nobody on this board ever took a US History class.
Posted on 7/20/14 at 1:38 pm to Darth_Vader
quote:
We're talking voting rights here. Not census methods.
I've heard about people like you.
Posted on 7/20/14 at 1:39 pm to Darth_Vader
quote:
I support abolishing the income tax so for all intents and purposes most of these people would not be paying any taxes anyway.
But they would still be paying property taxes, road taxes, sales taxes, you fricking idiot
Posted on 7/20/14 at 1:39 pm to inelishaitrust
quote:
Yeah! And all the non-landowners can count as 3/5 of a person towards representation. This is a brilliant idea that's never been considered or tried before. I swear nobody on this board ever took a US History class.
You don't think the constitution was perfect as ratified in 1789?
Are you a progressive or something?
Posted on 7/20/14 at 1:40 pm to SpidermanTUba
quote:
Should poor people have less rights than rich people?
Yes. Poors should be processed into food for other poors, like I said.
Posted on 7/20/14 at 1:40 pm to SpidermanTUba
quote:
Should poor people have less rights than rich people?
No. They should be equal. And pay equal taxes. Wait. Something else. Equal in other ways. If we take a lot of the rich dude's money and give it to the poor dude, then it'll be more fairer. Or something.
Posted on 7/20/14 at 1:41 pm to Darth_Vader
quote:
My work here is done.
Espousing idiocy isn't work. It's very, very easy and is accomplished by millions of idiots in all nooks and crannies of the internet even as we speak.
Posted on 7/20/14 at 1:41 pm to Crow Pie
In this scenario a person earning $125K, with a adj income of $108K that paid $15K in tax would get 51 "votes"
This post was edited on 7/20/14 at 1:44 pm
Posted on 7/20/14 at 1:42 pm to Vols&Shaft83
quote:
Yes. Poors should be processed into food for other poors, like I said.
Wouldn't that give them mad cow disease or something.
Posted on 7/20/14 at 1:43 pm to Crow Pie
I want to apologize to the posters in this thread for bringing my personal life in here. Sometimes I feel some of your views aren't based in reality. I wonder if some of these stances would be so hard line if it involved a family member or if you would put old or sick people out. I mentioned my situation to put somewhat of a face on the issue. Also maybe to get unbias feedback concerning difficult decisions ahead. Again thank you and I'm sorry
Posted on 7/20/14 at 1:44 pm to Crow Pie
In this scenario a person earning $41K with adj net income of $38K that paid $2K in taxes would get 13 "votes"
Posted on 7/20/14 at 1:44 pm to Vols&Shaft83
The surest sign of a feeble mind is thd need to resort to insults the moment your confronted with a conflicting view from your own.
I posted that first statement of mind for the sole purpose of seeing how people would react when confronted with a real view of how things actually were at the founding of our republic. And your reaction was typical and expected. You reacted with ignorance and vitriol. You've been trolled and you're too stupid to realize it.
I posted that first statement of mind for the sole purpose of seeing how people would react when confronted with a real view of how things actually were at the founding of our republic. And your reaction was typical and expected. You reacted with ignorance and vitriol. You've been trolled and you're too stupid to realize it.
This post was edited on 7/20/14 at 1:46 pm
Posted on 7/20/14 at 1:44 pm to Tiguar
quote:
First option sounds a lot like taxation without representation to me.
It absolutely is, which is what I was getting at. I resisted calling him King George
quote:
Darth_Vader
quote:
I support abolishing the income tax so for all intents and purposes most of these people would not be paying any taxes anyway.
If voting strictly on property ownership, then you'd have to eliminate taxes of every other sort for anyone who didn't own property.
You are now faced with putting the nation's entire financial burden solely on land owning citizens versus taxation without representation (if you abolish income tax only).
I can appreciate a different point of view as it pertains to our tax/voting issues and solutions provided to fix those issues...but either way your method isn't feasible.
Posted on 7/20/14 at 1:44 pm to Crow Pie
My favorite Econ professor at Mizzou had a similar proposal.
Posted on 7/20/14 at 1:44 pm to Navytiger74
Yeah, but I'm the type with the mental disorder known as white guilt, not the low IQ kind.
Posted on 7/20/14 at 1:45 pm to Crow Pie
quote:
In this scenarios a person earning $125K, with a adj income of $108K that paid $15K in tax would get 51 "votes"
What are you going to do when you realize that along that voting chart you'll have rights one hell of a lot more akin to a snaggle-tooth crackwhore than you do with a multimillionaire?
Billionaires? Pfft. They might pass some amendments to make all the women in La. concubines.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News