Started By
Message

re: Would the Pelicans have been better off with Nerlens Noel?

Posted on 7/15/14 at 4:44 pm to
Posted by burdman
Louisiana
Member since Aug 2007
20685 posts
Posted on 7/15/14 at 4:44 pm to
quote:

Why isn't AD allowed to work miracles?


Didn't say he couldn't. Just agreed LBJ taking that Cavs team to the finals was a miracle.
Posted by KG5989
Das Boot
Member since Oct 2010
16324 posts
Posted on 7/15/14 at 5:26 pm to
quote:

Plus you got to give the guy more time to learn his teammates habits and gamestyle. I think that's often overlooked when evaluating a pg going to a new team.


This. It's like a QB going to a new team. It takes a while to get the offense down and even longer to understand how your teammates play and what they like/want to do and all that before it becomes 2nd nature.
Posted by LosLobos111
Austere
Member since Feb 2011
45385 posts
Posted on 7/15/14 at 5:36 pm to
quote:

You mean middling players like the two SG that we pay $26M to each year.


The only middling one is EG
Posted by Colonel Flagg
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2010
22796 posts
Posted on 7/15/14 at 6:29 pm to
quote:

You mean middling players like the two SG that we pay $26M to each year.


Tyreke's PER rating would have made him either the 5th most efficient SG or 6th most efficient SF in the league depending on what position you wanted to say he played last season. The majority of his minutes came at SF though.
Posted by PKTiger
NOLA
Member since Apr 2013
836 posts
Posted on 7/15/14 at 6:45 pm to
quote:

Tyreke's PER rating would have made him either the 5th most efficient SG or 6th most efficient SF in the league depending on what position you wanted to say he played last season. The majority of his minutes came at SF though.


ESPN's real plus-minus also had him 69th among SF. Be careful about trying to paint a picture with one stat.

ETA: I just used this stat to show the danger of using one stat. There certainly aren't 68 small forwards better than Tyreke.
This post was edited on 7/15/14 at 6:50 pm
Posted by LosLobos111
Austere
Member since Feb 2011
45385 posts
Posted on 7/15/14 at 7:06 pm to
Plus minus is kind of worthless imo
Posted by KG5989
Das Boot
Member since Oct 2010
16324 posts
Posted on 7/15/14 at 8:14 pm to
quote:

he cant shoot


He can't shoot from deep right now, but I thnk he will have a higher FG% than Lillard has... Which is 42.7%. Lillard is a better shooter than Payton, but he also settles for the 3 way more than he should. Lillard averaged 15.9 shot attempts per game, and 6.8 were from 3. That's a bunch.

Plus I think Payton averages more assists as well. Lillard has Aldridge, Batum, and Wes Matthews on the floor with his most of every game, and he averages the same amount assists as Joakim Noah. If Lillard would shoot a couple times fewer per game and get his assists to around 7-8 per game, he would be better and so would the Blazers. I actually think Lillard is better suited as a scoring 2 guard rather than a true PG.

And I think Payton will be a really good rebounding PG and 1 of the top defensive PGs in the nba. I don't know what his ppg will be, but I'm fairly confident that he will have better FG% than Lillard. If I had to guess a stat line for Payton it would be like 15ppg, 7 assists, 5 rebs, 2 steals and shooting 45%. If he improves as a shooter, he could be a very good player. I def see some similarities between Elfrid and Gary Payton, not saying he will be as good as Gary, but I do see some similarities.

That said, gimme Jrue Holiday all day every day right now. Payton could be great, Payton could suck. Holiday is a proven all star caliber PG and just made 24 years old.
This post was edited on 7/15/14 at 8:18 pm
Posted by partywiththelombardi
Member since May 2012
11588 posts
Posted on 7/15/14 at 8:43 pm to
Honestly I love our team...X factor is EG and his thieving azz. If he ever suits up long enough to get traded or be useful...this team can go places.

besides all this talk about who do we want to be... the spurs have pop, alot of the teams mentioned here...have never won a title...OKC, Cleveland, Orlando, Portland, Indiana...

Dells model is his own. He has assembled enough talent for this team to make some noise.

its really on Monty and Gordon to carry their weight.
Posted by whoknows1390
nola
Member since Jul 2014
1672 posts
Posted on 7/16/14 at 6:28 am to
i think at this point its more on Monty than anyone else. this is probably the most talent we've had since the team was here. as long as we are healthy this needs to be a playoff team. no more excuses.
Posted by corndeaux
Member since Sep 2009
9634 posts
Posted on 7/16/14 at 7:00 am to
quote:

but I thnk he will have a higher FG% than Lillard has... Which is 42.7%. Lillard is a better shooter than Payton, but he also settles for the 3 way more than he should. Lillard averaged 15.9 shot attempts per game, and 6.8 were from 3. That's a bunch


Are you really arguing that Lillard is a poor shooter because his FG% is 42? Can you tell me what Ryan Anderson's career FG% is?

And how in the world is he settling for too many 3s when he hits them at 39%? Jrue Holiday would be much better than a mediocre offensive player if he took even half the number of 3s Lillard takes.

quote:

Lillard has Aldridge, Batum, and Wes Matthews on the floor with his most of every game, and he averages the same amount assists as Joakim Noah. If Lillard would shoot a couple times fewer per game and get his assists to around 7-8 per game


This is a fundamental misunderstanding of what Portland does and the danger in labeling guys by position. The offense isn't designed to run through his table setting. They have 4 guys that all share in creating shots for each other. Lillard isn't "traditional pg,: but he doesn't have to be.
Posted by Galactic Inquisitor
An Incredibly Distant Star
Member since Dec 2013
15176 posts
Posted on 7/16/14 at 7:51 am to
quote:

Which is 42.7%. Lillard is a better shooter than Payton, but he also settles for the 3 way more than he should. Lillard averaged 15.9 shot attempts per game, and 6.8 were from 3. That's a bunch.


His % is low because fg% is flawed for guards or anyone who takes a decent # of 3s. Considering that a 3 is worth 1.5 times as much as a 2, his 39.1% from 3 gives you just as many points as someone shooting 59.4% from inside the arc on the same number of attempts.

If someone shoots over about 36% from 3, it's not a bad thing to shoot from that range.
Posted by Galactic Inquisitor
An Incredibly Distant Star
Member since Dec 2013
15176 posts
Posted on 7/16/14 at 7:53 am to
quote:

Plus I think Payton averages more assists as well. Lillard has Aldridge, Batum, and Wes Matthews on the floor with his most of every game, and he averages the same amount assists as Joakim Noah. If Lillard would shoot a couple times fewer per game and get his assists to around 7-8 per game, he would be better and so would the Blazers. I actually think Lillard is better suited as a scoring 2 guard rather than a true PG.

And I think Payton will be a really good rebounding PG and 1 of the top defensive PGs in the nba. I don't know what his ppg will be, but I'm fairly confident that he will have better FG% than Lillard. If I had to guess a stat line for Payton it would be like 15ppg, 7 assists, 5 rebs, 2 steals and shooting 45%. If he improves as a shooter, he could be a very good player. I def see some similarities between Elfrid and Gary Payton, not saying he will be as good as Gary, but I do see some similarities.



Did you go to ULL? You're building Payton up like he's going to be first team all-NBA before he touches and NBA court.
Posted by maine82
Member since Aug 2011
3320 posts
Posted on 7/16/14 at 9:42 am to
quote:

Name another small market who has built a championship contender through the draft, other than OKC

...

Also, being a small market team, he has to overpay to get those guys... its not an ideal situation, but it is what it is.


I'm not excluding large and medium market teams because I don't think the size of the market is relevant, but rather how the team was built:

Boston in the 80s - Bird and McHale were both draft picks
Chicago in the 90s - Jordan, Pippen and Grant were all draft picks
Detroit in the 80s - Thomas, Dumars and Rodman were all draft picks
OKC you mentioned
Orlando in '95 - Shaq was a draft pick and essentially so was Hardaway
Orlando in '09 - Dwight Howard was a draft pick
San Antonio - Robinson, Duncan, Parker, Ginobili and Leonard were all draft picks
Utah in the 90s - Malone and Stockton were both draft picks

Unless you're a glamour franchise like the Lakers (and you have smart ownership, which they don't have at the moment), the teams that do the best usually are built through the draft.

In retrospect, I would have dealt Gordon and used him to get a lottery pick in last year's draft. It wouldn't have been an even swap even with whatever role players we would get to make the trade work, but I see Gordon's value only deteriorating. I would have kept Noel and probably drafted McLemore (no one saw MCW coming and I'm trying to base this on what people would have thought at the time), and I would have kept Lopez and Vazquez.

That probably sends me in the tank, which puts me in a position to get Payton or maybe even Smart. You have a nucleus of Davis-Noel-Payton, and you give Rivers and McLemore another year to get their acts together. Because you've done it this way, and you didn't pick up massive contracts on Tyreke and Holliday, you have cap space to go after Parsons or maybe Stephenson.

I'm going to root for the Pelicans no matter what, but I think we went about this the wrong way. Championship teams are built in a crock-pot, not a microwave.
This post was edited on 7/16/14 at 9:47 am
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 7Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram