- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Would the Pelicans have been better off with Nerlens Noel?
Posted on 7/15/14 at 4:44 pm to TigerinATL
Posted on 7/15/14 at 4:44 pm to TigerinATL
quote:
Why isn't AD allowed to work miracles?
Didn't say he couldn't. Just agreed LBJ taking that Cavs team to the finals was a miracle.
Posted on 7/15/14 at 5:26 pm to Peliclown
quote:
Plus you got to give the guy more time to learn his teammates habits and gamestyle. I think that's often overlooked when evaluating a pg going to a new team.
This. It's like a QB going to a new team. It takes a while to get the offense down and even longer to understand how your teammates play and what they like/want to do and all that before it becomes 2nd nature.
Posted on 7/15/14 at 5:36 pm to PKTiger
quote:
You mean middling players like the two SG that we pay $26M to each year.
The only middling one is EG
Posted on 7/15/14 at 6:29 pm to PKTiger
quote:
You mean middling players like the two SG that we pay $26M to each year.
Tyreke's PER rating would have made him either the 5th most efficient SG or 6th most efficient SF in the league depending on what position you wanted to say he played last season. The majority of his minutes came at SF though.
Posted on 7/15/14 at 6:45 pm to Colonel Flagg
quote:
Tyreke's PER rating would have made him either the 5th most efficient SG or 6th most efficient SF in the league depending on what position you wanted to say he played last season. The majority of his minutes came at SF though.
ESPN's real plus-minus also had him 69th among SF. Be careful about trying to paint a picture with one stat.
ETA: I just used this stat to show the danger of using one stat. There certainly aren't 68 small forwards better than Tyreke.
This post was edited on 7/15/14 at 6:50 pm
Posted on 7/15/14 at 7:06 pm to PKTiger
Plus minus is kind of worthless imo
Posted on 7/15/14 at 8:14 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
he cant shoot
He can't shoot from deep right now, but I thnk he will have a higher FG% than Lillard has... Which is 42.7%. Lillard is a better shooter than Payton, but he also settles for the 3 way more than he should. Lillard averaged 15.9 shot attempts per game, and 6.8 were from 3. That's a bunch.
Plus I think Payton averages more assists as well. Lillard has Aldridge, Batum, and Wes Matthews on the floor with his most of every game, and he averages the same amount assists as Joakim Noah. If Lillard would shoot a couple times fewer per game and get his assists to around 7-8 per game, he would be better and so would the Blazers. I actually think Lillard is better suited as a scoring 2 guard rather than a true PG.
And I think Payton will be a really good rebounding PG and 1 of the top defensive PGs in the nba. I don't know what his ppg will be, but I'm fairly confident that he will have better FG% than Lillard. If I had to guess a stat line for Payton it would be like 15ppg, 7 assists, 5 rebs, 2 steals and shooting 45%. If he improves as a shooter, he could be a very good player. I def see some similarities between Elfrid and Gary Payton, not saying he will be as good as Gary, but I do see some similarities.
That said, gimme Jrue Holiday all day every day right now. Payton could be great, Payton could suck. Holiday is a proven all star caliber PG and just made 24 years old.
This post was edited on 7/15/14 at 8:18 pm
Posted on 7/15/14 at 8:43 pm to KG5989
Honestly I love our team...X factor is EG and his thieving azz. If he ever suits up long enough to get traded or be useful...this team can go places.
besides all this talk about who do we want to be... the spurs have pop, alot of the teams mentioned here...have never won a title...OKC, Cleveland, Orlando, Portland, Indiana...
Dells model is his own. He has assembled enough talent for this team to make some noise.
its really on Monty and Gordon to carry their weight.
besides all this talk about who do we want to be... the spurs have pop, alot of the teams mentioned here...have never won a title...OKC, Cleveland, Orlando, Portland, Indiana...
Dells model is his own. He has assembled enough talent for this team to make some noise.
its really on Monty and Gordon to carry their weight.
Posted on 7/16/14 at 6:28 am to partywiththelombardi
i think at this point its more on Monty than anyone else. this is probably the most talent we've had since the team was here. as long as we are healthy this needs to be a playoff team. no more excuses.
Posted on 7/16/14 at 7:00 am to KG5989
quote:
but I thnk he will have a higher FG% than Lillard has... Which is 42.7%. Lillard is a better shooter than Payton, but he also settles for the 3 way more than he should. Lillard averaged 15.9 shot attempts per game, and 6.8 were from 3. That's a bunch
Are you really arguing that Lillard is a poor shooter because his FG% is 42? Can you tell me what Ryan Anderson's career FG% is?
And how in the world is he settling for too many 3s when he hits them at 39%? Jrue Holiday would be much better than a mediocre offensive player if he took even half the number of 3s Lillard takes.
quote:
Lillard has Aldridge, Batum, and Wes Matthews on the floor with his most of every game, and he averages the same amount assists as Joakim Noah. If Lillard would shoot a couple times fewer per game and get his assists to around 7-8 per game
This is a fundamental misunderstanding of what Portland does and the danger in labeling guys by position. The offense isn't designed to run through his table setting. They have 4 guys that all share in creating shots for each other. Lillard isn't "traditional pg,: but he doesn't have to be.
Posted on 7/16/14 at 7:51 am to KG5989
quote:
Which is 42.7%. Lillard is a better shooter than Payton, but he also settles for the 3 way more than he should. Lillard averaged 15.9 shot attempts per game, and 6.8 were from 3. That's a bunch.
His % is low because fg% is flawed for guards or anyone who takes a decent # of 3s. Considering that a 3 is worth 1.5 times as much as a 2, his 39.1% from 3 gives you just as many points as someone shooting 59.4% from inside the arc on the same number of attempts.
If someone shoots over about 36% from 3, it's not a bad thing to shoot from that range.
Posted on 7/16/14 at 7:53 am to KG5989
quote:
Plus I think Payton averages more assists as well. Lillard has Aldridge, Batum, and Wes Matthews on the floor with his most of every game, and he averages the same amount assists as Joakim Noah. If Lillard would shoot a couple times fewer per game and get his assists to around 7-8 per game, he would be better and so would the Blazers. I actually think Lillard is better suited as a scoring 2 guard rather than a true PG.
And I think Payton will be a really good rebounding PG and 1 of the top defensive PGs in the nba. I don't know what his ppg will be, but I'm fairly confident that he will have better FG% than Lillard. If I had to guess a stat line for Payton it would be like 15ppg, 7 assists, 5 rebs, 2 steals and shooting 45%. If he improves as a shooter, he could be a very good player. I def see some similarities between Elfrid and Gary Payton, not saying he will be as good as Gary, but I do see some similarities.
Did you go to ULL? You're building Payton up like he's going to be first team all-NBA before he touches and NBA court.
Posted on 7/16/14 at 9:42 am to MrPappagiorgio
quote:
Name another small market who has built a championship contender through the draft, other than OKC
...
Also, being a small market team, he has to overpay to get those guys... its not an ideal situation, but it is what it is.
I'm not excluding large and medium market teams because I don't think the size of the market is relevant, but rather how the team was built:
Boston in the 80s - Bird and McHale were both draft picks
Chicago in the 90s - Jordan, Pippen and Grant were all draft picks
Detroit in the 80s - Thomas, Dumars and Rodman were all draft picks
OKC you mentioned
Orlando in '95 - Shaq was a draft pick and essentially so was Hardaway
Orlando in '09 - Dwight Howard was a draft pick
San Antonio - Robinson, Duncan, Parker, Ginobili and Leonard were all draft picks
Utah in the 90s - Malone and Stockton were both draft picks
Unless you're a glamour franchise like the Lakers (and you have smart ownership, which they don't have at the moment), the teams that do the best usually are built through the draft.
In retrospect, I would have dealt Gordon and used him to get a lottery pick in last year's draft. It wouldn't have been an even swap even with whatever role players we would get to make the trade work, but I see Gordon's value only deteriorating. I would have kept Noel and probably drafted McLemore (no one saw MCW coming and I'm trying to base this on what people would have thought at the time), and I would have kept Lopez and Vazquez.
That probably sends me in the tank, which puts me in a position to get Payton or maybe even Smart. You have a nucleus of Davis-Noel-Payton, and you give Rivers and McLemore another year to get their acts together. Because you've done it this way, and you didn't pick up massive contracts on Tyreke and Holliday, you have cap space to go after Parsons or maybe Stephenson.
I'm going to root for the Pelicans no matter what, but I think we went about this the wrong way. Championship teams are built in a crock-pot, not a microwave.
This post was edited on 7/16/14 at 9:47 am
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News