Started By
Message

re: PuttaDaForkDown

Posted on 5/18/13 at 5:45 pm to
Posted by mouton
Savannah,Ga
Member since Aug 2006
28276 posts
Posted on 5/18/13 at 5:45 pm to
No offense, but this is absolutely the dumbest argument I have ever engaged in my life. Let me get this straight.... You are trying to tell me if you took groups, both consuming an equal number of calories. One group does zero exercise. The other group engages in moderate intensity exercise five times a week. There will be no difference in weight loss between the two groups?
Posted by TigerMyth36
River Ridge
Member since Nov 2005
39725 posts
Posted on 5/18/13 at 5:53 pm to
Can you read?

I said most people burn out. Most people fail at weight loss. They give up when the burn out.

First off most people will quit no matter which path they take.

I said TWICE to each his own. What works for one person won't necessarily work for another.

I can't tell you how many times in this thread alone, people burned out or were frustrated when the scale didn't move while they were lifting weights.
Posted by mouton
Savannah,Ga
Member since Aug 2006
28276 posts
Posted on 5/18/13 at 6:03 pm to
I understand that people burn out. People burn out on diet as well. People have to figure out works best for themselves. Maybe I'm mistaken but I thought you were arguing that exercise doesn't aid in weight loss which is an absurd argument.
Posted by TigerMyth36
River Ridge
Member since Nov 2005
39725 posts
Posted on 5/18/13 at 6:10 pm to
quote:

People burn out on diet as well. People have to figure out works best for themselves.
I said that.

quote:

exercise doesn't aid in weight loss which is an absurd argument.

I said it can cause gains which can lead to people quitting.

As I said, if people can stick to it, then it works but most people cant. And I also said most will burn out and quit no matter which path they take.


This post was edited on 5/18/13 at 6:11 pm
Posted by mouton
Savannah,Ga
Member since Aug 2006
28276 posts
Posted on 5/18/13 at 6:15 pm to


I thought you were trying to argue it doesn't help. Sorry I was posting from the gym.
Posted by Hulkklogan
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Oct 2010
43295 posts
Posted on 5/18/13 at 6:17 pm to
I think what you're misinterpreting is that he said putting on muscle can stop the scale itself from going down. In that sense, it can cause stalls and slow 'weight loss'. It will, however expedite fat loss, which is the goal in the end anyway.
Posted by TigerMyth36
River Ridge
Member since Nov 2005
39725 posts
Posted on 5/18/13 at 6:20 pm to
No, I just believe a person with massive amounts to lose might have a better chance with diet only.

You jocks need to realize that if we had been jocks we wouldn't have enlarged to 300+ in the first place.

Posted by mouton
Savannah,Ga
Member since Aug 2006
28276 posts
Posted on 5/18/13 at 6:43 pm to
Yeah most people are focused solely on the # on the scale. I asked someone recently if they would rather lose 80 pds and be 20% bodyfat or lose 50 and be 10% . They said 80. When I asked them why they said they wanted to lose weight.
Posted by TigerMyth36
River Ridge
Member since Nov 2005
39725 posts
Posted on 5/18/13 at 7:45 pm to
Yeah but someone that needs to lose 80 pounds of fat can't lose 50 to get to 10%.

Posted by mouton
Savannah,Ga
Member since Aug 2006
28276 posts
Posted on 5/18/13 at 9:19 pm to
Are you doing any exercise at all or just diet?
Posted by Tom288
Jacksonville
Member since Apr 2009
20966 posts
Posted on 5/19/13 at 4:30 am to
This is why a regular old tape measure is a better tool to monitor your progress than a scale.
Posted by Benchwarmer
Member since Feb 2004
4963 posts
Posted on 5/19/13 at 8:50 am to
170/153/145
Posted by LSUEnvy
Hou via Lake Chas
Member since May 2011
12086 posts
Posted on 5/19/13 at 9:24 am to
235/192/180
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
278065 posts
Posted on 5/19/13 at 11:11 am to
quote:

No offense, but this is absolutely the dumbest argument I have ever engaged in my life. Let me get this straight.... You are trying to tell me if you took groups, both consuming an equal number of calories.


welcome to my world

people actually believe this in this thread.
Posted by mouton
Savannah,Ga
Member since Aug 2006
28276 posts
Posted on 5/19/13 at 11:42 am to
Well in myths defence , he clarified to say he thought exercise could be a detriment because someone could get burned out from trying to do to much at once though that's not what he said at first.
This post was edited on 5/19/13 at 12:43 pm
Posted by TigerMyth36
River Ridge
Member since Nov 2005
39725 posts
Posted on 5/19/13 at 12:09 pm to
323/177.3/175

Bad grilled shrimp caesar didn't do any damage.
Posted by Paul Allen
Montauk, NY
Member since Nov 2007
75097 posts
Posted on 5/19/13 at 12:42 pm to
3 glasses of wine last night along with 4 beers. Weighed myself this morning lost 2 pounds.
Posted by mouton
Savannah,Ga
Member since Aug 2006
28276 posts
Posted on 5/19/13 at 12:44 pm to
This is a diet I can get behind!!! Serious though. It's likely water weight. Alcohol acts as a diuretic .
Posted by Paul Allen
Montauk, NY
Member since Nov 2007
75097 posts
Posted on 5/19/13 at 12:49 pm to
Yeah I thought so.
Posted by tduecen
Member since Nov 2006
161244 posts
Posted on 5/19/13 at 12:59 pm to
Alcohol and running diet, drink 3 beers while running 2 miles
first pageprev pagePage 601 of 934Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram