Started By
Message

re: KU does not take Mizzou announcement well

Posted on 11/7/11 at 1:10 pm to
Posted by ready4something
virginia beach
Member since Jul 2008
6541 posts
Posted on 11/7/11 at 1:10 pm to
Missouri and Texas A&M should have stayed in the Big 12. Well, texas A&M does have a great track team. Watching them get beat every other week is sickening. In the west Texas A&M will be the extension of mississippi schools and in the east missouri will be holding it down with S. Carolina, kentucky and vanderbilt. Tennessee, Florida and Georgia can you please stand up.
Posted by rockchlkjayhku11
Cincinnati, OH
Member since Aug 2006
36449 posts
Posted on 11/7/11 at 8:39 pm to
quote:

Not sure why they are so upset about us leaving if they hate us so much.


we just lost 6 bball wins a year with colorado, nebraska, and mizzou leaving. it hurts a little bit.
Posted by TigerMattSTL
O'Fallon, MO
Member since Aug 2011
1105 posts
Posted on 11/7/11 at 10:09 pm to
quote:

we just lost 6 bball wins a year with colorado, nebraska, and mizzou leaving. it hurts a little bit.


And losses in all of your other sports, since BB is all KU has.
Posted by CGSC Lobotomy
Member since Sep 2011
80058 posts
Posted on 11/8/11 at 1:45 am to
quote:

Well, texas A&M does have a great track team


and soccer (2 seed, Top 10 nationally)
and volleyball (Top 15 nationally)
and baseball (CWS last year, #6)
and basketball (#19 this year, 6 straight tournament appearances)
and women's basketball (defending national champs)
and softball (Top 20 last year)
....
Posted by cyde
He gone
Member since Nov 2005
31793 posts
Posted on 11/8/11 at 2:28 am to
quote:

Someone sounds butthurt


Kansas is also mad because they don't affect the long-term strength of the Big 12.
Posted by TigersSEC2010
Warren, Michigan
Member since Jan 2010
37359 posts
Posted on 11/8/11 at 2:44 am to


KU can't say shite to anyone. Hell, Tulane would whip that arse silly.

Them trying to start shite with MU is like the fat kid making fun of the sorta fat pimple kid for having the balls to ask the hot chick to the dance.
Posted by SunHog
Illinois
Member since Jan 2011
9202 posts
Posted on 11/8/11 at 2:49 am to
quote:

and soccer (2 seed, Top 10 nationally)
and volleyball (Top 15 nationally)
and baseball (CWS last year, #6)
and basketball (#19 this year, 6 straight tournament appearances)
and women's basketball (defending national champs)
and softball (Top 20 last year)


Why is TAMU ALWAYS referencing women's sports?
Posted by CGSC Lobotomy
Member since Sep 2011
80058 posts
Posted on 11/8/11 at 5:18 am to
quote:

Why is TAMU ALWAYS referencing women's sports?


2010-2011 Directors Cup - 8th
2010-2011 Men's Capital One Cup - 2nd
2010-2011 Women's Capital One Cup - 3rd

Clearly we can't do shite athletically
Posted by Imtheman2
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2011
146 posts
Posted on 11/8/11 at 7:43 am to
Guys...don't sell the new schools decisions as bad. In aTm case, they should have been here years ago and will compete at a very high level. Everything is in place for them. As for Missouri, they will start to rise with the new competition. They will expand and work harder to compete.

Think how a school like LSU was down for years because our administrators didn't want to build the athletic facilities to compete. We would lose 5 star recruits from Louisiana to FSU because they could eat and sleep better there.

aTm will compete at the highest level and Missouri like Arkansas.
Posted by TbirdSpur2010
ALAMO CITY
Member since Dec 2010
134026 posts
Posted on 11/8/11 at 7:57 am to
quote:

2010-2011 Directors Cup - 8th
2010-2011 Men's Capital One Cup - 2nd
2010-2011 Women's Capital One Cup - 3rd

Clearly we can't do shite athletically


lulz [/thread]
Posted by Aux Arc
SW Missouri
Member since Oct 2011
2184 posts
Posted on 11/8/11 at 8:43 am to
Even if Mizzou never plays Kansas in any sport ever again, every true son will continue to hate those Sons of Bitches.

PS - to all those who keep spouting off about Missouri's inability to compete, are you still living in the 1990's? We are having a rough year, granted, but the last four years produced 40 wins in a tough Big XII. What is our record against SEC teams? I'm not saying we will dominate the SEC, but we will have some good years.
Posted by busey
First Coast, Florida
Member since Feb 2010
22958 posts
Posted on 11/8/11 at 8:47 am to
Kentucky, State, and Ole Miss have all had good years, too. All very recently.
Posted by TbirdSpur2010
ALAMO CITY
Member since Dec 2010
134026 posts
Posted on 11/8/11 at 8:53 am to
quote:

What is our record against SEC teams?


1-0
Posted by Tiger in Texas
Houston, Texas
Member since Sep 2004
20865 posts
Posted on 11/8/11 at 8:13 pm to
quote:

Kansas is just mad because nobody wants them.


So true, Kansas would sacrifice virgins for a chance to get in the SEC...
Posted by MissouriFan
St. Louis, MO
Member since Oct 2011
90 posts
Posted on 11/9/11 at 4:59 pm to
Pretty sure despite their hurt feelings the game will go on. The current game in KC pays each school 1.5 million every year and kU needs the money. Remember when Texas and the LHN were trying to get a conference game they got turned down by every Big 12 team including the likes of Baylor and K-State but kU was willing to whore themselves out for the money. I also think a MU/kU basketball game will happen at the Sprint Center for the same reason. It would be just like the game we play every year against the Illini in St. Louis.

With Mizzou leaving the Big 12 the hate seems to have spiked to a new level. The TV networks will love it.

And if for some reason the kU faithful are to sore to let the game continue I wouldn't be surprised to see us restart our series with Nebraska. A game against the Huskers in KC would probably pay out even more and the TV stations would love it. We've played NU almost as much as kansas. For many Mizzou football fans the Nebraska game was more important than the kU game anyway.
Posted by texasaggie08
Triple D, TX
Member since Dec 2010
1408 posts
Posted on 11/9/11 at 5:04 pm to
Wasn't Vandy good with Cutler?

What people don't realize, sadly moreso with A&M than with Mizzou, is that we are not leaving much recent success behind in the Big 12.

The WORST thing that will happen is that we'll continue to go to crappy bowls most years, on average, but play a significantly better schedule from a fan's standpoint. That is the worst case scenario, and it isn't terrible compared to the last 10 years of Aggie football.
This post was edited on 11/9/11 at 5:05 pm
Posted by sfury
Member since Oct 2011
285 posts
Posted on 11/9/11 at 5:07 pm to
quote:

I also think a MU/kU basketball game will happen at the Sprint Center for the same reason. It would be just like the game we play every year against the Illini in St. Louis.


I'm not so sure because they are following the orders of the Big 12 I believe. But if KC is so worried about losing the Big 12 tourney I say have a holiday tourney every year hosted by Mizzou. The College Basketball HoF is located by the Sprint center so use it to help promote it. Have the College Basketball HoF classic hosted by MU every year. If they can bring in some good teams the TV stations would love it.
Posted by stapuffmarshy
lower 9
Member since Apr 2010
17507 posts
Posted on 11/9/11 at 5:39 pm to
quote:

NU/OU


yep that stinks

quote:

CU/OU
CU/NU


never gave a poop and were rarely relevant nationally

Posted by evil cockroach
27.98N // 86.92E
Member since Nov 2007
7457 posts
Posted on 11/13/11 at 2:28 pm to
quote:

The school's official Facebook and Twitter accounts also posted this: "Missouri forfeits a century-old rivalry. We win."


first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram