I really don't understand the people trying to discredit Lane K. as a o.c.

I read thread after thread about he isn't any good. This simply isn't true.

1) Do I wish he was more mature and likeable? Absolutely. The Hate/dislike aside. He's pretty darn good.

2) l.k. has been the o.c. at two different universities that have won n.c.'s.

3) He is an outstanding recruiter. He secured Hurt's, who is a pretty good freshman. He has the #1 d.t. qb committed in Tua. He also got the l.t. commit that is a five star. (haven't these two area's been a problem at lsu?) He was the recruiting coordinator at usc when they secured some of the most talented teams in the country.

4) His one season at Tennessee he took an underman team with, Jonathan Crompton as qb, and came within one play, blocked f.g. by cody, of beating a n.c., saban coached, Alabama team.

5) His offensive statics are skewed at bama. When they are up 35 to 3,7, 10 or whatever. They don't have to score more points. They shut it down and play clock. You don't have to put 50 up and 800 yards offense to win games. you have to do that when you don't have a defense.

I'm not a fan of L.K. the person or should I say, what appears to be the person. However, you have to put your distain to the side and recognize he's pretty good at what he does and can help elevate lsu. He's done it for to long at to many places. This isn't just about offense. It's about offense and obtaining talent to compete for championships. he can do both.