- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Online Photo Storage: Amazon v Google
Posted on 10/1/15 at 2:24 pm
Posted on 10/1/15 at 2:24 pm
I have prime, so I have been using the free unlimited storage on Amazon. But my boss uses google, and I like the features that come with it (automatic albums, easier to use, etc...) but dont want to pay for it. Yall have any input or suggestions? Which is better?
5
Posted on 10/1/15 at 2:35 pm to Royal
Google costs money?
Posted on 10/1/15 at 2:37 pm to Royal
if you upload photos within their restraints, it's unlomited storage. Anything above it uses storage
quote:
Unlimited free storage
Regular cameras: Recommended for phones or point-and-shoot cameras that are 16 megapixels (MP) or less.
Uses: Good for typical printing and sharing.
Size: Save high-quality photos and videos while reducing size.
quote:
Original
Limited free storage: Uses your Google Account's 15 GB of free storage, regardless of photo or video size.
DSLR cameras: Recommended if you take photos with a DSLR camera and want to maintain the exact original quality.
Uses: Recommended for printing large banners or to store original files.
Size: Stores your photos and videos exactly as you captured them.
Posted on 10/1/15 at 2:37 pm to guedeaux
quote:
Google costs money?
I THOUGHT you get a free amount of storage for "standard" photos, and limited storage for "high quality"? Is this just with cell photos and automatic back up?
ETA: just saw the above post, thanks.
My real question is on ease of use
This post was edited on 10/1/15 at 2:39 pm
Posted on 10/1/15 at 2:39 pm to Royal
Pbase is what I use.
Posted on 10/1/15 at 2:50 pm to Royal
quote:
My real question is on ease of use
Ease of use in what way? They both have apps for automatic photo backup from your phone. Beyond that functionality, the service with the fewest features will likely be the easiest, but both are elementary simple.
Posted on 10/1/15 at 3:06 pm to Royal
Google is the answer to most things as long as you can live with how creepy as frick it is
Posted on 10/1/15 at 3:27 pm to Royal
i pretty much use amazon for anything that involves music, photos, and movies. i like having it all in one place.
Posted on 10/1/15 at 10:48 pm to ILikeLSUToo
I may be wrong on this, but I have my photos on both services.
As mentioned, Google is unlimited if you don't save your photos in .raw or anything like that.
However, it does not seem that Amazon has this limitation.
Something to think about if correct.
As mentioned, Google is unlimited if you don't save your photos in .raw or anything like that.
However, it does not seem that Amazon has this limitation.
Something to think about if correct.
This post was edited on 10/1/15 at 10:49 pm
Posted on 10/2/15 at 8:35 am to Teddy Ruxpin
Why don't you create a Facebook and make it private.
Posted on 10/2/15 at 8:53 am to Alter Number 3
I have backed up all my photos to google, took like a week. It's a pretty cool program, although sorting by albums isn't that easy. If I select 100+ pictures I have "Trouble adding to album"
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News