- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
120 vs 240 motion rate. effective difference?
Posted on 2/14/16 at 11:17 am
Posted on 2/14/16 at 11:17 am
Looking at 75" Samsung 4K UHD
THANKS
THANKS
4
Posted on 2/14/16 at 12:04 pm to Rouge
I would ignore the motion rate fluff that manufactures come up with these days. There are more important factors to consider and basically every 4K TV on the market right now has a true refresh rate of 60 or 120 hz.
What TVs are you looking at brah ?
What TVs are you looking at brah ?
Posted on 2/14/16 at 12:26 pm to Rouge
Wouldn't get lower than 240. Theres a big difference 120 and lower
Posted on 2/14/16 at 12:50 pm to TigerWise
quote:
I would ignore the motion rate fluff that manufactures come up with these days. There are more important factors to consider and basically every 4K TV on the market right now has a true refresh rate of 60 or 120 hz.
This, don't fall for the false advertising from the tv companies like Rex has
Posted on 2/14/16 at 1:58 pm to Rouge
I have a 2013 65" Sony 4K with the speakers built in and freakin love it. It does seem like Samsung is bringing 4K tech along faster at this point as they are about to release the first 4K blue ray player.
120hz is plenty and the guy that said 240 is better doesn't know what he's talking about. Much more important factors to pic quality than that.
120hz is plenty and the guy that said 240 is better doesn't know what he's talking about. Much more important factors to pic quality than that.
Posted on 2/14/16 at 2:00 pm to Rouge
Doesn't matter if the content you watch isn't broadcast at 240. 120 is what you need.
Posted on 2/14/16 at 3:04 pm to TigerWise
Posted on 2/14/16 at 3:06 pm to TigerWise
quote:
ignore the motion rate fluff that manufactures come up with these days. There are more important factors to consider
Posted on 2/14/16 at 3:19 pm to ILikeLSUToo
In what way does this not matter? It's the most important factor when choosing a TV, and price reflects it.
60hz is a waste of money. There's nothing above 120hz, except simulated motion rates up to 960.
60hz is a waste of money. There's nothing above 120hz, except simulated motion rates up to 960.
Posted on 2/14/16 at 3:50 pm to TeddyPadillac
Motion rate via interpolation, not refresh rate, is what means jack shite.
I realize, though, that it's practically impossible to have a discussion here (or any other forum) about TV refresh rate without the confusion of interpolation muddying the waters.
I realize, though, that it's practically impossible to have a discussion here (or any other forum) about TV refresh rate without the confusion of interpolation muddying the waters.
This post was edited on 2/14/16 at 3:56 pm
Posted on 2/14/16 at 4:02 pm to Rouge
quote:
Definitely wide open at this point
At that price I think you could do better. That's one of those big box club TV models. Shoot me a text or email tomorrow while I'm at work and I might be able to help you out.
Posted on 2/14/16 at 4:06 pm to TeddyPadillac
quote:
It's the most important factor when choosing a TV, and price reflects it.
Demonstrably false - lots of folks turn OFF the interpolated refresh rate as part of the "soap opera" effect. There is no appreciable advantage, currently, for a native refresh rate greater than 120hz and almost 100% of sets are natively at 60hz or 120hz.
You think LG is charging thousands for those giant OLED sets because of the refresh rate?
This post was edited on 2/14/16 at 4:07 pm
Posted on 2/14/16 at 4:12 pm to TigerWise
quote:
TigerWise
I think I've seen you chime in on other TV threads with accurate knowledge. You work in the industry?
Posted on 2/14/16 at 4:21 pm to TigerWise
I'll holler tomorrow
Posted on 2/14/16 at 11:27 pm to ell_13
quote:
Doesn't matter if the content you watch isn't broadcast at 240. 120 is what you need.
By that logic you don't need 120 either. The highest broadcast rate you'll get is 60hz
I will say that 120 is what I would go for since it can show movies at 24fps at a normal rate aka it shows each frame 5 times. 60hz it has to switch between 3 and 2 times
Posted on 2/14/16 at 11:30 pm to TeddyPadillac
quote:
In what way does this not matter? It's the most important factor when choosing a TV, and price reflects it. 60hz is a waste of money. There's nothing above 120hz, except simulated motion rates up to 960.
So much wrong in this post
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News