- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: England's MNT
Posted on 8/3/11 at 1:52 pm to hendersonshands
Posted on 8/3/11 at 1:52 pm to hendersonshands
quote:
I don't have to group you in anywhere, you do a good enough job all by yourself.
great. So because I don't think Chile/ Ghana would be favored v.s. England.
Posted on 8/3/11 at 1:52 pm to ohiovol
quote:
I can think of the 2011 Copa America and the 2006 and 2010 World Cups where they lost to the runner up in the quarterfinals. Is there anything else recently? Serious question.
friendly's as well. Which aren't the be all end all but they still mean a little.
This post was edited on 8/3/11 at 1:54 pm
Posted on 8/3/11 at 1:54 pm to adammwilson
quote:
friendly's as well. Which aren't the be all end all but they still mean a little.
I wouldn't base much off that, to be honest. Maybe it should make them panic a little about the upcoming cup, but that's about it.
This post was edited on 8/3/11 at 1:55 pm
Posted on 8/3/11 at 1:54 pm to adammwilson
Yes, because you're just talking out your arse with no knowledge about the other team. You just assume "we're England, no way Chile would be favored against us." That's a typical British attitude.
Posted on 8/3/11 at 1:57 pm to hendersonshands
quote:
Yes, because you're just talking out your arse with no knowledge about the other team. You just assume "we're England, no way Chile would be favored against us." That's a typical British attitude.
No it isn't. You really think say if people were predicting the game they'd pick Chile?
I don't think that would happen. Maybe 1 out of every 5 people would expect the upset. Say you know everything and they know nothing all you want but they get payed for their opinions you don't get paid to spread your English hate.
Posted on 8/3/11 at 1:57 pm to adammwilson
quote:
I don't think Chile/ Ghana would be favored v.s. England.
A friendly in Wembley, with an English officiating crew, maybe you're right.
An official match, neutral site, crew- I don't care, I think 85% of the world would take Chile. It would be handicapped as such.
Posted on 8/3/11 at 1:57 pm to hendersonshands
England
Alderia
Slovenia
Yanks
How did that turn out?
Alderia
Slovenia
Yanks
How did that turn out?
Posted on 8/3/11 at 1:58 pm to Dandy Lion
quote:
An official match, neutral site, crew- I don't care, I think 85% of the world would take Chile. It would be handicapped as such.
no way. I'm not buying that.
Posted on 8/3/11 at 2:00 pm to glassman
quote:
England
Alderia
Slovenia
Yanks
How did that turn out?
yeah England played like shite the whole tournament what's your point?
So many things were wrong in the W.C. and England still got to the round of 16.
Posted on 8/3/11 at 2:00 pm to adammwilson
quote:
I don't think that would happen. Maybe 1 out of every 5 people would expect the upset. Say you know everything and they know nothing all you want but they get payed for their opinions you don't get paid to spread your English hate.
IT WOULDN'T BE AN UPSET
Posted on 8/3/11 at 2:00 pm to glassman
quote:
England
Algeria
Slovenia
Yanks
How did that turn out?
That's the arrogance that really bothers me about England. And I'm not trying to say Adam is like that.
This post was edited on 8/3/11 at 2:05 pm
Posted on 8/3/11 at 2:02 pm to adammwilson
quote:
no way. I'm not buying that.
and we've come full circle
Posted on 8/3/11 at 2:03 pm to glassman
How could you not love Slovenia? Pay special attention to the guy just to the left of #5, Cesar.
ETA: Sorry, the reference of the 2010 WC Group just me got excited about my favorite random team.
ETA: Sorry, the reference of the 2010 WC Group just me got excited about my favorite random team.
This post was edited on 8/3/11 at 2:04 pm
Posted on 8/3/11 at 2:04 pm to adammwilson
quote:
what's your point?
That the English have an inflated opinion of their status in the sport. Adam, this was published when the draw was made. Did you think at the time that England would play so poorly.
Posted on 8/3/11 at 2:05 pm to glassman
quote:
That the English have an inflated opinion of their status in the sport. Adam, this was published when the draw was made. Did you think at the time that England would play so poorly.
Poor McMannaman (spelling?) never saw it coming.
Posted on 8/3/11 at 2:05 pm to adammwilson
Would give a slight edge to England on neutral site. Maybe -105 on the books. Anyway Chile has one win and three ties against Uruguay dating back to the qualifiers. By your logic Chile IS better. Lol. And yes I have a Chile bat signal whenever they are mentioned.
This post was edited on 8/3/11 at 2:07 pm
Posted on 8/3/11 at 2:10 pm to ohiovol
quote:
Poor McMannaman (spelling?) never saw it coming.
Beckham's expressions were priceless as well.
Posted on 8/3/11 at 2:14 pm to hendersonshands
quote:
IT WOULDN'T BE AN UPSET
according to Fifa it would and anyone else who gets payed for doing rankings.
Posted on 8/3/11 at 2:15 pm to ohiovol
quote:
That's the arrogance that really bothers me about England. And I'm not trying to say Adam is like that.
well to be fair I don't think anyone expected Algeria or Slovenia to put up much of a fight but to think the U.S. would be easy was very very stupid.
Posted on 8/3/11 at 2:16 pm to ohiovol
quote:
That's the arrogance that really bothers me about England. And I'm not trying to say Adam is like that.
well to be fair I don't think anyone expected Algeria or Slovenia to put up much of a fight but to think the U.S. would be easy was very very stupid.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News