Started By
Message
locked post

Your new race riot in the wings. Cleveland

Posted on 11/26/14 at 11:18 am
Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
52787 posts
Posted on 11/26/14 at 11:18 am
LINK

quote:

Tamir Rice died at a hospital after being shot Saturday by an officer who had responded to a call about someone with a gun at a Cleveland playground. Police say Tamir was told to raise his hands but instead reached into his waistband for what appeared to be a firearm. Police later determined it was an airsoft gun, which shoots small plastic pellets, that did not have an orange safety indicator at the end of the barrel.


Again, if you want to blame someone, blame the parents. Maybe they shouldn't let their 12 year old bring a fake gun with no identifying marks of it being fake, to a playground.

But i'm sure the race baiters will be out calling for riots because on the face of the issue, it looks bad. But the details appear to be justified, despite how horrible the outcome was.

Think of it this way, would you want the police called if a kid had a gun at a playground?
Posted by bamarep
Member since Nov 2013
51805 posts
Posted on 11/26/14 at 11:24 am to
The details in Ferguson didn't make much of a difference either.
Posted by taylork37
Member since Mar 2010
15327 posts
Posted on 11/26/14 at 11:44 am to
Meh,

The airsoft gun thing will limit the ability of the racebaiters, despite how dumb/ignorant people are.
Posted by arcalades
USA
Member since Feb 2014
19276 posts
Posted on 11/26/14 at 11:50 am to
The root cause of this is that cops aren't smart people. If cops were smart, they would be able to handle these kids.
Posted by KCT
Psalm 23:5
Member since Feb 2010
38911 posts
Posted on 11/26/14 at 12:02 pm to
It's a thankless job.

If a policeman guesses wrong and shoots someone when he didn't need to, then we have a) the tragedy of an unnecessary death, and b) the potential for all Hell to break loose.

If the policeman guesses wrong, doesn't shoot, and he is killed, then we have that tragedy. Very few people will care, though, or maybe even hear about this kind of tragedy.

It's a tough job, and a thankless job. There is NO WAY I would ever take a job as a policeman, especially in a community with a large minority population. Guess wrong one time, and you're either dead or Public Enemy #1.

PS - Darren Wilson apparently didn't even do anything wrong, and he still became Public Enemy #1.
Posted by mametoo
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2008
3215 posts
Posted on 11/26/14 at 12:15 pm to
quote:

The root cause of this is that cops aren't smart people. If cops were smart, they would be able to handle these kids. 


Really? Tell me more.
Posted by Zantrix
Parts Unknown
Member since Nov 2009
7940 posts
Posted on 11/26/14 at 12:21 pm to
quote:

The root cause of this is that cops aren't smart people. If cops were smart, they would be able to handle these kids.



Posted by onmymedicalgrind
Nunya
Member since Dec 2012
10590 posts
Posted on 11/26/14 at 12:26 pm to
quote:

It's a tough job, and a thankless job.

Posted by MSMHater
Houston
Member since Oct 2008
22774 posts
Posted on 11/26/14 at 12:40 pm to
quote:

But the details appear to be justified, despite how horrible the outcome was.


I'll accept the shooting as justified based on how police are trained and their current protocols. The officers are certainly covered.

But I think those protocols are immensely flawed. I guess I consider it analogous to our terrorism policies. We always set policy based on the lowest common denominator without regard to everyone else. I know police policies are crafted with personal safety in mind...but it's not always them that needs to be protected.

A 12 year old kid running around with a gun on the playground. 99% of the time, common sense will tell you that this is a child playing with a toy gun, but there are child murderers, and protocol is based on that 1% occurence.

100000 arabs get on an airplane in full garb. 99999 of them just want to get to their destination, but we set policy based on the 1.

There just has to be a better way to handle the situation other than shoot first, ask questions later. Could the police have taken cover while drawing down on the kid to guage his reaction? Could they have addressed him from a safer distance? Could they have let him verbally respond before firing? I honestly don't know, it just seems there has to be alternatives to current protocols associated with increased militarization. And that's all the way from patrolmen to SWAT teams. Is "no-knock" & flashbangs really the best policy you can come up with for potential narcotics raids?

This could just be me watching too much TV, but doesn't our military employ "do not fire until fired upon" ROE in certain situations? Yet we can't do that with our own citizens?

I know I spent alot of running around with toy guns when I was a kid, and a situation like this would have never even been a remote possibility. What has changed?
This post was edited on 11/26/14 at 12:41 pm
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
33403 posts
Posted on 11/26/14 at 1:10 pm to
quote:

MSMHater


Thank you for this.

And for other examples of police incidents that are worth making hay over:

Columbia, SC, state trooper gas station shooting in September

Eric Garner killed by NYPD in July

I think we can all agree that we have turned over way too much power to the law.

Posted by Patrick_Bateman
Member since Jan 2012
17823 posts
Posted on 11/26/14 at 1:32 pm to
Unarmed*










* Not really
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
64533 posts
Posted on 11/26/14 at 1:35 pm to
quote:

The root cause of this is that cops aren't smart people. If cops were smart, they would be able to handle these kids.


Go stand in front of a total stranger and let them pull a gun on you. I'm guessing at best you'll have about 2-3 seconds tops to decide if that gun is real or not. Let's see how you'd handle the situation.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111513 posts
Posted on 11/26/14 at 1:39 pm to
quote:

Unarmed* * Not really



Lololol
Posted by Big12fan
Dallas
Member since Nov 2011
5340 posts
Posted on 11/26/14 at 1:43 pm to
quote:

But I think those protocols are immensely flawed. I guess I consider it analogous to our terrorism policies. We always set policy based on the lowest common denominator without regard to everyone else. I know police policies are crafted with personal safety in mind...but it's not always them that needs to be protected.


Could not have said it better.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
260351 posts
Posted on 11/26/14 at 1:43 pm to
quote:



I'll accept the shooting as justified based on how police are trained and their current protocols. The officers are certainly covered.

But I think those protocols are immensely flawed.


Totally agree. Cops are cleared in shootings based on training and policy all the time, it's the protocol in the field that we need to look at and change some of those policies.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111513 posts
Posted on 11/26/14 at 1:46 pm to
3rded or 4thed or whatever
Posted by ehidal1
Chief Boot Knocka
Member since Dec 2007
37134 posts
Posted on 11/26/14 at 1:54 pm to
quote:

I think we can all agree that we have turned over way too much power to the law.

Agreed, but why does it always end up a race issue? Right after the Ferguson incident, you could have convinced me on the cop overreach or cop ego angle.

Once you mention race as the motivator, it just destroys the legitimacy of the argument. Despite racism existing, I doubt you can find many cops willing to shoot and kill someone solely because he is black.

Society doesn't understand that just because someone may be 'pro- white' or 'pro-black' doesn't mean they hate the other race enough to needlessly kill someone? Hell, I know a few people that would be considered racist but none of them want to kill a person because of their race.
Posted by BuckyBadger
Member since Aug 2014
740 posts
Posted on 11/26/14 at 2:05 pm to
quote:

Again, if you want to blame someone, blame the parents. Maybe they shouldn't let their 12 year old bring a fake gun with no identifying marks of it being fake, to a playground.
Yeah. Blame the parents for allowing their child to use a toy. We shouldn't blame the company for manufacturing a toy that looks realistic with no identifying marks.

Thought this country was about 2nd amendment. Why shouldn't a citizen be able to carry a gun in public without being shot. Yet, it never seems to happen to white males carrying rifles into Chili's.
Posted by MSMHater
Houston
Member since Oct 2008
22774 posts
Posted on 11/26/14 at 2:08 pm to
quote:

We shouldn't blame the company for manufacturing a toy that looks realistic with no identifying marks.


It was manufactured according to regulations, with a red ring on the end of the barrel to identify it as a toy.

Unfortunately, the boy took the red ring off.
Posted by FT
REDACTED
Member since Oct 2003
26925 posts
Posted on 11/26/14 at 2:13 pm to
quote:

Columbia, SC, state trooper gas station shooting in September
This one was fricking appalling.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram