re: Why Opposition to Special Permits for Assault Rifles ?

quote:

---

After we have a tax on voting and test requirements prior to voting.

---

You know this already happened, right? So we are living in a time after there has been a tax on voting and test requirements.

Are you trying to tell us you're in favor of the OP?

quote:

---

And yet it's been the weapon of choice in dozens of mass shootings. Every time we lose 10 or more people it seems it's some idiot who got ahold of an AR.

But yeah, totally not a weapon used to assault.

The argument is akin to someone having tomatoes in their vegetable garden. "Dude, you can't call that a vegetable garden! You have tomatoes! Tomatoes are fruit, not vegetables!!!".

---

Embarrassing. I can assault you, even kill you with those tomatoes. Does that make them "Assault Tomatoes?" Ponder for one second all of the things that can be arbitrarily deemed "assault weapons."

quote:

---

america is the strongest military in history. if they want to get you, they will.

---

Lol I guessed you missed them tucking tail and fleeing Afghsnistsn leaving all their gear behind a few months ago.

????


Care to commment

While you messed up by incorrectly using the term "Assault Rifles," there are already restrictions on weapons even though the argument against them is the slippery slope.

You will find some who think that we should all be able to own anti-aircraft weapons and tanks also; so, there is no discussion.

I own probably six guns and have one on me when not at work or the gym all the time. Personally, for personal protection purposes, I have a problem with anyone who can carry a gun with more rounds that my 9mm, because that makes it more difficult for one to defend ones self, but any discussion about gun law changes is verboten by the people who don't believe in exchange of ideas as guaranteed in the First Amendment.

Of course, by using the term "assault rifle," you eliminated any possibility of discussion. Of course, yesterday, I had to tell one of my employees who owns an AR-15 that AR did not stand for Assault Rifle. So, even some owners are unaware.


VI. KNOWINGLY POSSESS OR MANUFACTURE CERTAIN FIREARMS:
Various offenses punishable by up to 5 or 10 years imprisonment, depending upon specific violation.

A. 26 USC § 5861. Generally unlawful to make or possess any unregistered machine gun or any part designed or intendedexclusively for use in converting a weapon into such weapon, firearm silencer, sawed-off shotgun or rifle which meet specific length criteria, or destructive device (as defined in 26 USC § 5845); see also 18 USC § 922(o): generally unlawful to possess or transfermachine guns made on or after May 19, 1986;

B. 18 USC § 922(v). Generally unlawful to manufacture, transfer, or possess semi-automatic assault weapon manufactured after Sept. 13, 1994; OR

C. 18 USC § 922(k). Generally unlawful to possess or receive any firearmthat has moved in interstate commerce which lacks a serial number or contains an altered or obliterated serial number.

Yes. In the past. Bring it back if you want special permits for certain scary black guns.

A voting permit is cool too, right?

Which part of shall no be infringed confuses you? Name another right you are willing to curtail because some crazy abuses said right.

quote:

---

Assault Rifles

---

What is this specifically?

quote:

---

Only because it is widely available

---

exactly.

quote:

---

That's how proper trolling works. You provide the bomb and the ignition and then observe.

---

i consider it ethical trolling. what i posted is exactly what the typical modern leftist would write...just regurgitating what they see/hear from msm

Point over your head.

There is always going to be something widely available.

If not the AR, then the Glock, the pump shotgun, etc. The AR just happens to hold that slot at the moment. If it wasn't that, it would be something else.