re: What Does this Board Think of Richard Spencer?

quote:

---

This way of thinking needs to go. You aren't better than someone because you are white. It's 2016...catch the frick up.

---

So why are there no white CBs in the NFL? We're all equal in everything as you point out

Or maybe Japanese people really do have the highest IQs black people really are the best athletes and white people really have formed superior cultures (as anybody with a pair of eyes and a functioning brain can see clear as day)?

quote:

---

The inability of the multicultists to admit that a culture is better than another culture isn't a rational argument.

---

I agree.

SirWinston, I don't disagree with you. However, what makes me uncomfortable about some white nationalist rhetoric is that some of it calls for making Western nations completely white. If they had their way, I would be shipped off to some other country.

Snooki isn't white.

The Duck fam are good people who worked hard and went from poor to rich because of discipline, hard work, and personality.

Mama June is just collateral damage of having a society so prosperous that even the dumbest and least capable aren't left to starve to death.

Richard Spencer has many ideas that are in direct conflict with our Declaration of Independence and the US Constitution. He seems to have some values that I would call "Un-American". I see no place for him in our mainstream society.

Constitutional Conservatism is the correct philosophy, and there is no place for Spencer's ideology within Constitutional Conservatism.

I would not be surprised to learn that George Soros is funding Richard Spencer.

quote:

---

some of it calls for making Western nations completely white. If they had their way, I would be shipped off to some other country.

---

I personally don't feel this way, but I will admit that some do. I think that Japanese culture is now superior to Western culture in most ways because our culture has regressed so much (in large part due to massive immigration and the effects of cultural leftism among our school systems over the past 40 years).

quote:

---

Has this been verified?.......other than from the mouth of a desperate opertunist?

---

Well he created a website called "Alternative Right" in 2010 which is way before "alt-right" became a commonly used term. If you look at Google Trends for alt-right and other variations, you see that people weren't commonly using it until this year.

It really only existed as a term on a few websites before 2016.

edit: Furthermore, the National Policy Institute was founded in 2005, and Spencer took over in 2011 after the original founder died. It's pretty clear that Spencer holds these views sincerely and is not just a troll. He's been actively promoting these white nationalist, white supremacist views for many years--way before "alt-right" became a trending term.

Right here is the difference between nationalist and supremecist. It's one thing to take pride in your culture. That's a good thing. To think yours is better than everyone else's is just ignorant. You clearly haven't exposed yourself to much else.

Apparently, he is a racist dirt bag who is secretly leading everyone that voted for Trump.

I am certain at most, one of those things is true...

quote:

---

IMO, I just don't see why we need a NAAWP or groups like that. White people have advanced pretty far without them. It just seems like people are afraid of no longer being on the top of the social food chain as white people. Equality scares them.

---

So, when a Group espouses a particular idea, they are "scared". Sounds more like it's those who oppose - and would censor - said idea that are the ones who are "scared".

There is a reason that overt racists don't post on this forum; and it ain't because they are unwelcome or censored. In fact, they are likely welcome to come and get their intellectual ideas/arses handed to them in rational debate. Thereby undermining any power they would otherwise wield.

That said, I don't know anything re Spencer. I do know this: Government subsidization - in various and manifold forms - are now tilted to benefit Blacks. IMO, such is done by Libs in power as a form of Reparations, which if called that in the body politic, would never pass Congression/Popular muster. As such, I can see why some or even many Whites could be inclined to support such views/ideas as (I suspect) Spencer may hold.

It's kinda like with Hillary Clinton's criminal email stuff...EQUAL JUSTICE don't come with different standards for different folk.