- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Was Malaysia Arlines flight MH370 a terrorist attack?
Posted on 3/12/14 at 7:48 am to Jbird
Posted on 3/12/14 at 7:48 am to Jbird
That's what I was thinking
I know even if they turn the transponder off you can still see it on radar so if radar contact is spotty in that area they wouldn't know where it is anyway.
And if they it wasn't seen by the radars for even two minuets it would be hard to find it again with a transponder working.
I know even if they turn the transponder off you can still see it on radar so if radar contact is spotty in that area they wouldn't know where it is anyway.
And if they it wasn't seen by the radars for even two minuets it would be hard to find it again with a transponder working.
This post was edited on 3/12/14 at 7:50 am
1
Posted on 3/12/14 at 7:51 am to catholictigerfan
The next few days could be interesting.
Posted on 3/12/14 at 8:10 am to Jbird
The OT is really buying into this oil rig email and theory, plus an apparent coverup or deliberate take down. I think some of the conspiracy theorist are taking over that thread.
Posted on 3/12/14 at 8:13 am to catholictigerfan
quote:hahaha those guys have some mad crazy skills over there.
The OT is really buying into this oil rig email and theory, plus an apparent coverup or deliberate take down. I think some of the conspiracy theorist are taking over that thread.
Posted on 3/12/14 at 8:15 am to Jbird
pretty much the OT is taking any theory that looks some what plausible and running with it so that if it turns out to be true the OT can claim we are the ones who solved it
Posted on 3/12/14 at 8:16 am to catholictigerfan
quote:Yeah I can see that.
pretty much the OT is taking any theory that looks some what plausible and running with it so that if it turns out to be true the OT can claim we are the ones who solved it
Posted on 3/12/14 at 8:22 am to Jbird
So what are all of the "Theories" thus far?
1) Catastrophic Failure
2) Terrorist Bombing
3) Terrorist Hijacking, have the plane somewhere
4) Shot down by govt
5) Cross Dimensional Vortex
1) Catastrophic Failure
2) Terrorist Bombing
3) Terrorist Hijacking, have the plane somewhere
4) Shot down by govt
5) Cross Dimensional Vortex
Posted on 3/12/14 at 8:24 am to Lsut81
6)Pilot or co pilot went nuts
7) catastophic clear air turbulence
7) catastophic clear air turbulence
Posted on 3/12/14 at 8:24 am to Lsut81
quote:
5) Cross Dimensional Vortex
aka lost, they are probably fighting some smoke monster right now
Posted on 3/12/14 at 8:25 am to Jbird
quote:
7) catastophic clear air turbulence
has this ever happened?
Posted on 3/12/14 at 8:27 am to catholictigerfan
quote:LINK
has this ever happened?
Posted on 3/12/14 at 8:30 am to Lsut81
quote:
5) Cross Dimensional Vortex
Posted on 3/12/14 at 8:30 am to Jbird
none of those clear air turbulence ever crashed a plane.
Posted on 3/12/14 at 8:31 am to catholictigerfan
The aircraft apparently had a catastrophic in flight structural failure due to severe turbulence because it was seen to emerge from the clouds with one of its wings broken away. All four crew members and 13 passengers were killed.
Posted on 3/12/14 at 8:33 am to Jbird
quote:
The aircraft apparently had a catastrophic in flight structural failure due to severe turbulence because it was seen to emerge from the clouds with one of its wings broken away. All four crew members and 13 passengers were killed.
so does clear air turbulence include going through clouds?
Posted on 3/12/14 at 8:34 am to catholictigerfan
quote:
aka lost,
What other explanation do you have?
And for whomever mentioned Clear Air Turbulance, wouldn't the jet have still been able to communicate/send out distress? Also, would that even be possible with a plane THAT large? I honestly don't know.
Posted on 3/12/14 at 8:37 am to catholictigerfan
quote:It can but I personally wouldn't consider it to be the case, not really sure what NTSB etc consider the parameters for CAT. Besides the chances of it being in play are pretty remote. The only way I can see CAT being a factor is if the aircraft already had a structural problem and or the aircrew severely over compensated for the CAT. In any event both seem extremely remote.
so does clear air turbulence include going through clouds?
Posted on 3/12/14 at 8:39 am to Jbird
I would also think the CAT would not explain the transponder going off.
Posted on 3/12/14 at 8:40 am to Lsut81
quote:
What other explanation do you have?
every day they go without finding it, the explanation is more and more likely.
This post was edited on 3/12/14 at 8:40 am
Posted on 3/12/14 at 8:40 am to catholictigerfan
quote:True unless it was a severe breakup, like I said highly unlikely, probably a better chance of winning the Powerball.
I would also think the CAT would not explain the transponder going off.
Page 12 of 13
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News