Started By
Message

re: Was Africa better off under European colonial rule?

Posted on 8/28/22 at 11:30 am to
Posted by Numberwang
Bike City, USA
Member since Feb 2012
13163 posts
Posted on 8/28/22 at 11:30 am to
Under African rule, most of them are trying to emigrate to Europe.

Posted by ChineseBandit58
Pearland, TX
Member since Aug 2005
43129 posts
Posted on 8/28/22 at 11:32 am to
quote:

African slave trade was the worst thing ever to happen to America.

Tell us how it could have been avoided.

And you are not allowed to get away with "because a whole bunch of people blame their current irresponsibility for things that happened to their great-grandfathers"
Posted by ChineseBandit58
Pearland, TX
Member since Aug 2005
43129 posts
Posted on 8/28/22 at 11:34 am to
quote:

The African slave trade was the worst thing ever to happen to America.

Not that it was a slave "trade" - who did they 'trade' with to get the slaves that were sold in the Americas??
Posted by Kafka
I am the moral conscience of TD
Member since Jul 2007
143037 posts
Posted on 8/28/22 at 11:34 am to
quote:

quote:

African slave trade was the worst thing ever to happen to America
Tell us how it could have been avoided
THEY COULD'VE PICKED IT THEM frickING SELVES
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 8/28/22 at 11:35 am to
Bandit, you are correct in observing that some sort of Prime Directive would never have worked. Once contact was established, ongoing contact was a given.

The question is really whether that ongoing contact could have been better handled.

Would it have been possible to have something looking less like exploitation, genocide and enslavement and more like the Marshall Plan? I honestly do not know. Without the profits to be made from exploitation, would anyone have invested in an uplift program?
This post was edited on 8/28/22 at 11:39 am
Posted by AU86
Member since Aug 2009
22513 posts
Posted on 8/28/22 at 11:39 am to
A Marshall Plan in Africa would have worked about as well as LBJ's Great Society Plan in America. Just look at the results. The colonial system is returning to Africa: this time in the form of the Chinese and in some limited areas the Russians.
This post was edited on 8/28/22 at 11:43 am
Posted by blueridgeTiger
Granbury, TX
Member since Jun 2004
20442 posts
Posted on 8/28/22 at 11:43 am to
quote:

who did they 'trade' with to get the slaves that were sold in the Americas??


Prisoners captured during inter-tribal wars in Africa were sold to Arab slave traders who then sold them to European slave traders who sold them to plantation owners in the Western Hemisphere. Quite a bit of trade going on.
Posted by Fat Bastard
coach, investor, gambler
Member since Mar 2009
73702 posts
Posted on 8/28/22 at 11:46 am to
quote:

I think reading up on King Leopold and the Congo would answer that question.




so belgians only did bad things?? what about brits, french and dutch?

so natives woulda been better without modern education, engineering, medicine and agriculture. They wanted to stay hunter-gatherers in mud huts?
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
112766 posts
Posted on 8/28/22 at 11:47 am to
Just watched an excellent video on Angola's escape from colonization and their modernization built on oil resources.
There are luxury cities, airports and the govt buildings. However, all of the people are still living in poverty. Like every other Africa country, the back leaders who took over were corrupt and built stuff strictly for the leaders.
Posted by SouthEasternKaiju
SouthEast... you figure it out
Member since Aug 2021
25988 posts
Posted on 8/28/22 at 11:48 am to
Stick with the first question first before you go off on a meaningless tangent.
Posted by Tchefuncte Tiger
Bat'n Rudge
Member since Oct 2004
57581 posts
Posted on 8/28/22 at 11:48 am to
In some places, perhaps "yes." The Belgian Congo, "no."
Posted by Fat Bastard
coach, investor, gambler
Member since Mar 2009
73702 posts
Posted on 8/28/22 at 11:50 am to
quote:

captured during inter-tribal wars in Africa were sold to Arab slave traders


400 years BEFORE they sold them to any euros.

but, but LIBTARDS here told me only white men took slaves!

and that indigenous people around the globe DID Not fight and kill each other and DID not take slaves!

frickin zulus had civil wars. american indians fought each other over lands and apache and comanche had slaves. Why are universities not teaching the truth??

they had million of slaves in brazil and carribean compared to 330k in the USA.
Posted by Fat Bastard
coach, investor, gambler
Member since Mar 2009
73702 posts
Posted on 8/28/22 at 11:52 am to
SO LIBTARDS LIED?? SHOCKED! we were told south africa and zimbabwe would be great now!
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 8/28/22 at 11:54 am to
quote:

They wanted to stay hunter-gatherers in mud huts?
Only a very small percentage of those captured and enslaved came from hunter-gatherer cultures. Most were subsistence farmers living in villages and (to a lesser extent) herdsmen. The nomadic herdsmen were generally too far east to get caught in the slave trade.

The majority of the hunter-gatherers were the Khoi-San in the Cape area, and the Dutch and British actually treated them rather well compared to other colonialists in other parts of the continent.
Posted by ChineseBandit58
Pearland, TX
Member since Aug 2005
43129 posts
Posted on 8/28/22 at 12:01 pm to
quote:

The question is really whether that ongoing contact could have been better handled.

Would it have been possible to have something looking less like exploitation, genocide and enslavement

Yes - of course that is the problem - and it can only be 'solved' by trying to undo the things that went wrong in prior approaches to solving the same problem.

My point is - there IS NO SCIENTIFIC plan for getting from point A to point B where
A = a continent full of prehistoric people
and
B = a world where descendants of those prehistoric people are fully integrated happily within any later civilization without there having been many repeated horrible outcomes for some segment of either society.

The BEST that we can hope for is to evaluate current societal norms as civilization progresses and work to make things better for currently disadvantaged people to better themselves.

There is no place for reparations for generations old sins (no punishment for 'sins of our fathers')

Yes - it is a shitty situation for someone who was raised in a generationally destitute culture that can be traced to slavery. But it has now been 150 years since the slavery part was solved, and we did spend the reconstruction period making some very bad governing decisions that didn't seem to help EITHER side of the slavery issue. Had Lincoln lived, we MAY have had a better result from the reconstruction period.

BUT - the point is that NOW we are looking at the results of a half century experiment in trying to BRIBE the slave descendants (and anyone who may sorta look like they might have been) into becoming up to date with the normal progression of western civilization. (and that has been slowed by idiotic attempts to "stop widening the gap.")

My ancestry was booted out of Scotland during the clearances - and came to America penniless and indentured to work off the cost of passage. True - I have white skin. But - I am thinking that if I had black skin - with the exact same upbringing and training that I received, that there would not have been (certainly after 'great society') avenues opened up that could have made me a multi-millionaire by now.

I think that "affirmative action" was a great idea - but that is because I actually BELIEVED that there would be no 'quotas' - and THAT was because I believe Hubert Humphrey when the avowed that he would "eat my hat" if there ever was a semblance of such a thing.

I believed if even through I hated LBJ - and 'just knew' he was a scoundrel - but my mistake was that I thought he was just for personal corruption. I was unaware at the time of his own collaboration with the 'fundamental change' cultists that have given us Clinton, Obama, and now potatus as heirs. (yep - toss in the Bush's also)

I feel bad for the situation of blacks in America today - but I do not see any way to improve it until they themselves to come to the concusion that the Democrat party is still treating them like cattle. Use them when they need them for votes - or rioting to divert attention - etc but feed them just enough to keep them alive and needing more.

UNTIL a movement starts within the black community to STOP THE MADNESS - nothing that can be imposed by DEMOCRATs for 'white suprmacists' to do - or stop doing- will have any effect except prolonging the intolerable situation the black community suffers today.

I believe the onus lies within the corruption and irresponsibility of the DEMOCRAT party and their cohorts in this 'one world' movement. Have no idea who are the puppeteers behind the scene on that.
Posted by Fat Bastard
coach, investor, gambler
Member since Mar 2009
73702 posts
Posted on 8/28/22 at 12:02 pm to
you are thinking of south africa. the zulus farmed wheat. maybe the Xhosa also

we are talking way farther north than that in west africa. if you think all those africans sub sahara did not have a shite ton of hut living hunters i have some ocean front property to sell you in the congo.
Posted by greygoose
Member since Aug 2013
11478 posts
Posted on 8/28/22 at 12:04 pm to
Wakanda has done pretty well.
Posted by LRB1967
Tennessee
Member since Dec 2020
16207 posts
Posted on 8/28/22 at 12:05 pm to
Obama's brother George stated that European colonial rule improved the quality of life in Africa in terms of innovation, education, health, etc. I never understood why his ideas were so different from those of Barack.
Posted by Figgy
CenCal
Member since May 2020
7308 posts
Posted on 8/28/22 at 12:07 pm to
quote:

The descendants of slaves in the U.S. are definitely better off than if their ancestors had been left in Africa.


I think this is accurate through Western eyes. Material possessions, standard of living, medicine etc.. there's no comparison to be made. But are they really better off when it comes to families and morals and things that make a society work? We talk about the collapse of the black family here and all of the detrimental effects it has, as we should. Sub-Saharan Africa is far from perfect in this area but they're light years ahead of where black America finds itself currently.
Posted by Fat Bastard
coach, investor, gambler
Member since Mar 2009
73702 posts
Posted on 8/28/22 at 12:10 pm to
the black natives in africa laugh at this country's mentally unstable trans clown movement. black immigrants also see through systemic racism lies and BLM BS.

watch this and learn

WHAT IS A WOMAN

the africans response is dead on accurate. this country is a joke now when africa is laughing at us.

first pageprev pagePage 2 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram