Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Under Trump Tax Proposal Mortgage Interest Deduction is Preserved

Posted on 10/1/17 at 9:35 am
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
123929 posts
Posted on 10/1/17 at 9:35 am
quote:

To provide simplicity and fairness the framework eliminates many itemized deductions that are primarily used by the wealthy, but retains tax incentives for home mortgage interest and charitable contributions, as well as tax incentives for work, higher education, and retirement security.

LINK

So with mortgage deductions off the table, the media needs a new narrative. In the MSM's new narrative, middle class families in high tax states might have to pay more. This is because state taxes will not be deductible.

Obviously those high tax states are more likely left-leaning states.
Their governments are also the most likely to swear dedication to a proposition of "taxing the rich" while protecting the middle class. Now they are warning their middle class citizens to oppose the new proposal because it could drive their taxes up.

However . . .

Middle Class citizens in blue states would not need be concerned at all IF THEIR STATES WERE NOT ALREADY TAXING the snot out of them.
That is the dirty little secret.

If ever there were an example of soak the rich schemes being exposed as actual middle class taxes, this is it.
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
68266 posts
Posted on 10/1/17 at 9:49 am to
It's a hair over 5% in LA. Not being able to deduct that screws me and taxes those dollars twice.
Posted by Homesick Tiger
Greenbrier, AR
Member since Nov 2006
54210 posts
Posted on 10/1/17 at 10:00 am to
quote:

This is because state taxes will not be deductible.



This is a good trade off for people who are retired in states where you don't pay state income taxes like here in Ark. I was a little on edge about the larger deduct for children as opposed to households without children but for states that collect state taxes on retirees this is a plus for them even though it will not benefit me here in Ark.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
123929 posts
Posted on 10/1/17 at 10:36 am to
quote:

It's a hair over 5% in LA. Not being able to deduct that screws me and taxes those dollars twice.
Even with the 0% line elevated to $24K?
Posted by I B Freeman
Member since Oct 2009
27843 posts
Posted on 10/1/17 at 10:48 am to
One positive thing about losing the local tax deduction is that it might curtail tax hikes in the states.

I say lose the mortgage interest deduction and lower rates further too. I shouldn't have to pay more taxes than the other guy because I paid off my house.
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
37106 posts
Posted on 10/1/17 at 11:57 am to
The fact the mortgage interest deduction is off the table shows the incredible power of the realtor lobby.
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
68266 posts
Posted on 10/1/17 at 12:10 pm to
quote:

Even with the 0% line elevated to $24K?


Where is it now? But, I suspect it'll still raise my taxes.
Posted by Bullethead88
Half way between LSU and Tulane
Member since Dec 2009
4202 posts
Posted on 10/1/17 at 12:16 pm to
quote:

The fact the mortgage interest deduction is off the table shows the incredible power of the realtor lobby.


Real estate is a huge component of the GDP. Can't get to 3% with RE dragging it down.
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
37106 posts
Posted on 10/1/17 at 12:43 pm to
quote:

Real estate is a huge component of the GDP. Can't get to 3% with RE dragging it down.


But it's not real growth. Interest rate deduction distorts housing prices.
Posted by CelticDog
Member since Apr 2015
42867 posts
Posted on 10/1/17 at 12:45 pm to
Thx.
Posted by tedmarkuson
texas
Member since Feb 2015
2592 posts
Posted on 10/1/17 at 12:55 pm to
quote:

Middle Class citizens in blue states would not need be concerned at all IF THEIR STATES WERE NOT ALREADY TAXING the snot out of them. That is the dirty little secret.


true, in fact it's their property tax and state income tax deductions that force us to "fix" the AMT every year.

by simply eliminating those deductions you've eliminated the AMT.

property taxes on my house in chicagoland where 12k per year.
This post was edited on 10/1/17 at 1:04 pm
Posted by Bullethead88
Half way between LSU and Tulane
Member since Dec 2009
4202 posts
Posted on 10/1/17 at 1:09 pm to
quote:

But it's not real growth. Interest rate deduction distorts housing prices.

Yes, it does. But it's a constant distortion. If they suddenly cut the deduction, real estate prices will decline, and new housing starts will fall, and the GDP will take a hit.
Posted by I B Freeman
Member since Oct 2009
27843 posts
Posted on 10/1/17 at 1:23 pm to
Do you know anybody that bought their primary home to get the tax deduction on the interest they pay?

It just is not that important like in was in 1980 when interest rates were 14% and tax rates were like 70%.

Get rid of it and lower the overall rates further.
Posted by cahoots
Member since Jan 2009
9134 posts
Posted on 10/1/17 at 1:35 pm to
I still don't get the rationale behind the mortgage interest deduction. Why are you penalized for having less debt by renting and/or paying off house in cash? Why should we incentivize debt?
Posted by TigerDeBaiter
Member since Dec 2010
10266 posts
Posted on 10/1/17 at 5:15 pm to
The student loan interest deduction is a joke already, so I want to see employers be able to pay off any amount of loans as “tax free income”.

Everybody should be able to get behind this. It allows those graduating to have their loans “forgiven”, but forgiven by merit and not a handout. These graduates will in turn have a whole lot more money to spend on housing and other goods. It’s a win win.
Posted by TigerDeBaiter
Member since Dec 2010
10266 posts
Posted on 10/1/17 at 5:18 pm to
quote:

Do you know anybody that bought their primary home to get the tax deduction on the interest they pay? It just is not that important like in was in 1980 when interest rates were 14% and tax rates were like 70%. Get rid of it and lower the overall rates further


Totally agree, but I think the fear is the National association of realtors would campaign hard against this. It’s a big selling point to their uneducated buyers. Sad, but true.
Posted by cameronml
Member since Oct 2007
1909 posts
Posted on 10/1/17 at 5:21 pm to
So the common logical argument behind repealing the death/estate tax is that it's double taxation, which I agree with. So now under this proposal, double taxation at the state and federal is acceptable?

Bunch of BS.
Posted by Bullethead88
Half way between LSU and Tulane
Member since Dec 2009
4202 posts
Posted on 10/3/17 at 11:40 pm to
quote:

But it's not real growth. Interest rate deduction distorts housing prices.

For sure, just like accellerated depreciation in the 70's + 80's was not real growth

But if they take away interest, prices will come down and housing starts starts will fall - and the GNP will take a hit for probably 2 or 3 quarters.

Can't have that when you are selling the big tax cut that big time increases the deficit, because you claim the resultant GNP growth (3%) will make up the deficits caused by the tax cuts.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram