- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1/1024th troll.
0
Posted on 10/30/18 at 7:18 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
When in sanctuary cities, are they "subject to the jurisdiction" of the United States Federal Government
Yes they are. "Sanctuary Cities" don't prevent federal law enforcement from detaining illegals. Once again, you've proven to everyone that you've never read a book in your life.
Posted on 10/30/18 at 7:21 am to CommoDawg
quote:
Yes they are. "Sanctuary Cities" don't prevent federal law enforcement from detaining illegals. Once again, you've proven to everyone that you've never read a book in your life.
Awesome. A freshman chastising highly successful adults. Such hubris. I love it. What time is class? Which book did you get your education on the legal implications of sanctuary cities? Give us specifics. Son.
This post was edited on 10/30/18 at 7:22 am
Posted on 10/30/18 at 7:21 am to FlatLakeTiger
quote:
The Constitution can be changed. It's happened before.
Trump is simply starting the conversation.
What are you talking about. He's signing a executive order that he thinks will take precedent over a clearly worded Constitutional Amendment. How is that starting a conversation?
The words in the first sentence of the Amendment couldn't be clearer.
quote:
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside.
If you want it changed there is a clearly defined way to go about changing it but as the 2nd Amendment folks around here keep screaming, you can't ignore an Amendment just because you don't like it.
Posted on 10/30/18 at 7:22 am to CommoDawg
quote:Ah, really?
"Sanctuary Cities" don't prevent federal law enforcement from detaining illegals.
So WTF do you think the term """SANCTUARY""" applies to?
Posted on 10/30/18 at 7:22 am to Sidicous
quote:
This is not a bad thing. Can you give some examples of things done by Congress that have worked out well for citizens?
No and that wasn't my point. My point is Congress is pretty much useless to America.
Posted on 10/30/18 at 7:23 am to BRTigerDad
quote:
Good, you are thinking and I appreciate that.
Oh hell naw, you want to cut and paste, and I will cut and paste...
Posted on 10/30/18 at 7:23 am to Haughton99
quote:
Haughton99
You take your facts and get out.
Posted on 10/30/18 at 7:24 am to BRTigerDad
quote:
Clearly unconstitutional. Why does this fool hate the Constitution?
Obama signed an executive order which said he would just stop executing immigration law, and created a new class of citizens altogether.
I’m sure you were fine with that. . .
Posted on 10/30/18 at 7:25 am to BRTigerDad
Show me where in the Constitution it talks about birthright citizenship.
I’ll give you a hint. It doesn’t.
I’ll give you a hint. It doesn’t.
Posted on 10/30/18 at 7:26 am to BRTigerDad
quote:
benefit from a bit of history
But wait, a President has no role or responsibility in an amendment...
You can't have this shite both ways...
Posted on 10/30/18 at 7:26 am to Boatshoes
quote:
A foreigner visiting the United States is not "subject to the jurisdiction of the United States"
So if they kill someone while here they are free to leave without being held responsible?
And the "subject to the jurisdiction of the United States" is clearly referencing the person born, not the parents.
This post was edited on 10/30/18 at 7:29 am
Posted on 10/30/18 at 7:28 am to Wednesday
Obama essentially neutered Border Patrol through department memos. It was so bad that drug mules would cross the border, drop their packages, find the closest highway and flag down BP or have someone call BP to come pick them up and take them to the border where they would be allowed to go back across. One BP agent told me they were essentially a free taxi service for the cartels.
Posted on 10/30/18 at 7:28 am to papasmurf1269
Posted on 10/30/18 at 7:29 am to Revelator
quote:
It should have never been implemented at all.
The 14th Amendment was ratified to grant citizenship to newly-freed slaves, not illegal border jumpers who cross in to the United States simply to have an "American" child. I am firmly on board with abolishing this amendment. The Left always wants to be like Europe, where at least one parent has to be a citizen in order for the child to have birthright citizenship. The USA should adopt such a policy.
Posted on 10/30/18 at 7:29 am to BRTigerDad
quote:"Well regulated Militia" has never been interpreted as the Constitutional container of arms, but rather a justification of the general population's possession of and familiarity with them.
"well regulated Militia"
Posted on 10/30/18 at 7:29 am to VoxDawg
Are you really suggesting you’re ok with a president trying to nullify a constitutional amendment via executive order?
Posted on 10/30/18 at 7:29 am to dr smartass phd
That may have been his intent, but that wasn't the intent of the other members of Congress.
If they wanted exceptions, then they could have stated those exceptions in the 14th A.
If they wanted exceptions, then they could have stated those exceptions in the 14th A.
Posted on 10/30/18 at 7:30 am to Nguyener
quote:
A brilliant example of politically motivated and stupid short sited measures by big government democrats
I would say any Reconstruction Amendments would have been done by the (Radical) Republicans, not Democrats.
Posted on 10/30/18 at 7:31 am to BRTigerDad
quote:
Now please read the entire sentence where you found that phrase, and then please note that our "well regulated Militia" has not been infringed -- our National Guard continues to thrive and has not been infringed.
It says, "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed" not, "the right of the militia".
Page 4 of 12
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News