re: Trump no longer looking to "drain the swamp"

quote:

---

I will clown you when you bring anemic arguments, though.

---

What an obnoxious thing to claim, especially when you've done little more than just say "NOPE" to my claims. My premise--that you said you reject--is that Trump is a narcissist uninterested in governing. Let's break that down into parts a) narcissist and b) uninterested.

A) Even though you claim to reject my premise, you basically already conceded that EVERY politician is a narcissist, so at this point we're only haggling over degree. I say more, you said about average. Either way, you're now already agreeing w/ a premise you claim to reject.

B) I said he is uninterested in governing. I based this on one article I can't locate now, so I'll provide you with some additional support:

1. "He needs an experienced person to do the part of the job he doesn’t want to do. He seems himself more as the chairman of the board, than even the CEO, let alone the COO." - LINK

2) “Trump sees himself as the straw that stirs the drink,” Schwartz said. “He has almost no interest in the details of how things happen, but he has an intense interest in being the decision-maker.” - LINK

3) Trump Declining Intel Briefings

4) "Barely five minutes into Ryan’s monologue, Trump cut him off. According to an individual familiar with the conversation, the Republican nominee said that Ryan obviously knew what he was talking about and would therefore be in charge of managing “this stuff” in a Trump administration." - LINK

5) And then keep in mind all the uncorroborated things we've heard: that he offered to make Kasich the most powerful VP in history, that he didn't even want to move to DC, that aides to Obama were shocked at his level of unpreparedness, and that he already has a deal in place with Republican leadership to allow them to handle all domestic policy.

Please, keep the silly self-aggrandizing comments a/b your argumentative prowess to yourself. You're not fooling anyone.

quote:

---

TbirdSpur2010

---

I think my favorite part of this exchange is that I'm relating an article I read to you, and you're simply denying the factual reporting. I freely admitted I can't find the article, so if you want to just say "I don't believe you w/o sources" then fine. But instead you actually challenge the premises of on an article you didn't even read, .

AND THEN, when I say something like "people aren't complex" you say "Au contraire! They ARE complex" and then pat yourself on the back like you're fricking Clarence Darrow.

Man, what a piece of work you are.

quote:

---

This was about beating "them". Nothing more.

---

I'm loving these melts and I can't stand Trump.

Loving them.

LOL. Hate it when your philosophy is used against you, don't you?

Are you still rooting for old white people to die?

You still cyber stalking me?

quote:

---

a want

---

8 yrs bitch....Melt!