Started By
Message

re: Trump approval climbs 13% overnight, Now at 50%

Posted on 3/21/17 at 2:34 pm to
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 3/21/17 at 2:34 pm to
quote:

It's Rasmussen. The poll that has been the constant outlier.

Ya know. I get this and I'm not some guy who dismisses polls.

But how the frick can we just pretend that a mere 6 months ago, these SAME outlets told us Trump had a sub 40 approval and yet he won?

I'm not saying just dismiss them. But sheesh. A health dose of skepticism is probably appropriate
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35236 posts
Posted on 3/21/17 at 2:36 pm to
quote:

But how the frick can we just pretend that a mere 6 months ago, these SAME outlets told us Trump had a sub 40 approval and yet he won?
What do you mean a sub 40 approval six months ago? I didn't even think they were tracking approval ratings then.
This post was edited on 3/21/17 at 2:38 pm
Posted by boogiewoogie1978
Little Rock
Member since Aug 2012
16968 posts
Posted on 3/21/17 at 2:37 pm to
quote:

But how the frick can we just pretend that a mere 6 months ago, these SAME outlets told us Trump had a sub 40 approval and yet he won?


Even a broken clock is right twice a day.
Posted by RockAndRollDetective
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2014
4506 posts
Posted on 3/21/17 at 2:37 pm to
Board full of gullible motherfrickers.
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 3/21/17 at 2:38 pm to
quote:

t do you mean a sub 40 approval six months ago. I didn't even think they were tracking approval ratings then.
they were tracking favorably which frankly, is basically the same thing.

The point I'm making is, it isn't like we didn't ALL just get fooled by polls.

You would think that would slow people's roll
Posted by ForeLSU
The Corner of Sanity and Madness
Member since Sep 2003
41525 posts
Posted on 3/21/17 at 2:38 pm to
quote:

But how the frick can we just pretend that a mere 6 months ago, these SAME outlets told us Trump had a sub 40 approval and yet he won?


because his opponent's unfavorables were just as bad...
Posted by Hog on the Hill
AR
Member since Jun 2009
13389 posts
Posted on 3/21/17 at 2:39 pm to
quote:

Ya know. I get this and I'm not some guy who dismisses polls.

But how the frick can we just pretend that a mere 6 months ago, these SAME outlets told us Trump had a sub 40 approval and yet he won?

I'm not saying just dismiss them. But sheesh. A health dose of skepticism is probably appropriate
Approval polls are different than election polls. In an approval poll, there isn't much screening involved. In election polls, you screen people to determine whether they are a likely voter. This is significant, because only about 60% of the eligible population voted in the 2016 election. So even if Trump's approval was below 40%, he could still get a significantly higher proportion of the votes cast in the election.
This post was edited on 3/21/17 at 2:40 pm
Posted by BamaScoop
Panama City Beach, Florida
Member since May 2007
53828 posts
Posted on 3/21/17 at 2:59 pm to
Just a different poll. CNN polls gay bars, black lives matter groups and Hollywood!
Posted by DawgsLife
Member since Jun 2013
58915 posts
Posted on 3/21/17 at 3:06 pm to
LINK

Nobody should put too much stock in those things. They are usually all over the place depending on who they poll.
Posted by Toddy
Atlanta
Member since Jul 2010
27250 posts
Posted on 3/21/17 at 3:09 pm to
quote:

This just can't be. Toddy told us yesterday in the 37% poll thread that Trump's approval rating was going to crash after the Comey hearing yesterday. Are you saying Toddy doesn't know what he's talking about?!


Let's see what the RCP average is over the next few weeks. It's not going to be pretty for Pussy Grabber.
Posted by Haughton99
Haughton
Member since Feb 2009
6124 posts
Posted on 3/21/17 at 4:00 pm to
quote:

But how the frick can we just pretend that a mere 6 months ago, these SAME outlets told us Trump had a sub 40 approval and yet he won?


That's an easy one. His opponent's favorable ratings were just as bad. Classic lesser of two evils election. Someone has to win.
Posted by TotesMcGotes
New York, New York
Member since Mar 2009
27873 posts
Posted on 3/21/17 at 4:12 pm to
Rasmussen gets one thing "right" and all the trump supporters want to claim it as the only acceptable poll now.
Posted by Bullethead88
Half way between LSU and Tulane
Member since Dec 2009
4202 posts
Posted on 3/21/17 at 4:12 pm to
quote:


Who happened to be one of the few to get the election right

Rasmussen had Trump higher than other polls consistently through the campaign. That's just a function the way their set up slants to a pro-republican result. They just happened to be slanted the right way in this election.

The Real Clear Politics Composite approval rate of all the polls it tracks is 43.6%.
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 3/21/17 at 4:14 pm to
quote:


because his opponent's unfavorables were just as bad.
the pollsters still claimed that Hillary had a greater than 90% chance of victory. You just can't fricking ignore that and act like all of these folks r squared away six months later
Posted by Haughton99
Haughton
Member since Feb 2009
6124 posts
Posted on 3/21/17 at 4:17 pm to
quote:

the pollsters still claimed that Hillary had a greater than 90% chance of victory.


If I would have told you the day of the election that she was going to win the popular vote by over 2%, what percentage chance of winning would you have given her?
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 3/21/17 at 4:25 pm to
quote:


If I would have told you the day of the election that she was going to win the popular vote by over 2%, what percentage chance of winning would you have given her?
because I understand how we elect presidents I would have asked for state-by-state polls.

And it was the state-by-state polls that posters used to derive their 90% figure

Posted by ForeLSU
The Corner of Sanity and Madness
Member since Sep 2003
41525 posts
Posted on 3/21/17 at 4:36 pm to
quote:

he pollsters still claimed that Hillary had a greater than 90% chance of victory.


Trump's total margin of victory in 3 key swing states that gave him the victory wouldn't fill up Tiger Stadium. But I do agree, traditional modeling and polling is becoming less and less accurate. It is why campaigns are relying much more on big data.
Posted by cwill
Member since Jan 2005
54752 posts
Posted on 3/21/17 at 4:38 pm to
Wait, polls matter again?
Posted by Goldrush25
San Diego, CA
Member since Oct 2012
33794 posts
Posted on 3/21/17 at 4:38 pm to
quote:

But how the frick can we just pretend that a mere 6 months ago, these SAME outlets told us Trump had a sub 40 approval and yet he won?


Don't know what any of this means but I assume it's supposed to mean that you believe Trump's actual odds of winning were not correctly reflected in the polling. I'm pretty sure his odds were rising in the polls right up to the election.

The main reason why the polls were mislead is because many people that ended up voting for him either didn't know they would vote for him or didn't admit it during polling. That's not the fault of the polls.

And the field of predictive analytics is not intended to be used as a crystal ball or magic. And without it, a lot of things you take for granted wouldn't exist.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
123887 posts
Posted on 3/21/17 at 4:41 pm to
quote:

Tiger Stadium
Damn big stadium.

I suspect on election night Hillary felt it "was like being inside a drum" too.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram