- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 7/10/17 at 8:59 am to DelU249
The counterpoint of course is if that had actually happened, the conservatives would be losing their minds. Neither side has much self-awareness.
Posted on 7/10/17 at 8:59 am to DuncanIdaho
quote:
50 years ago and not even close to the same situation.
Appointing kin to a position in government is not the same today as 50 years ago?
That's like saying nighttime isn't the same degree of darkness as fifty years ago.
Time does not change word definitions my friend.
Posted on 7/10/17 at 8:59 am to DuncanIdaho
quote:
You people would lose your fricking mind if Hillary did what he did.
We'll never have to find out because that bitch isn't ever going to be in those shoes
Posted on 7/10/17 at 8:59 am to DuncanIdaho
quote:
You people would lose your fricking mind if Hillary did what he did.
You probably weren't politically aware in 1993. But Hillary was writing healthcare policy then. And the right lost its mind. And the left informed the right that they were sexist and out of touch. So, tit for tat. Welcome back to 1993.
Posted on 7/10/17 at 8:59 am to Gusoline
[quote]thats everybody's president![/quote/]
FIFY
FIFY
Posted on 7/10/17 at 8:59 am to olddawg26
quote:
To be fair if any president asked their kid to do anything official I'd have an issue with it. I didn't vote for their kids or wife, I voted for them.
In case you aren't aware it is common for leaders to have someone sit for them when they go into meetings elsewhere.
Whoever would have done this would have been someone you did not elect/vote for regardless of whether it was his kid. So your point isn't really valid in this situation.
Posted on 7/10/17 at 9:00 am to the808bass
quote:
So, tit for tat
As long as you admit both are wrong. I'll allow it
Posted on 7/10/17 at 9:01 am to olddawg26
quote:
I didn't vote for their kids or wife, I voted for them.
There are 435 members of the House and you only get to vote for one of them.
You didn't vote for the various heads of federal agencies or any member of the Supreme court.
Let's face it, we are ruled by people we didn't put in charge.
Posted on 7/10/17 at 9:01 am to DuncanIdaho
quote:
not even close to the same situation.
Yeah, naming your brother attorney general is much worse than having your daughter sit down while you take a leak
Posted on 7/10/17 at 9:02 am to Erin Go Bragh
True but blood is thicker than water and it's a conflict of interests. You know that.
Posted on 7/10/17 at 9:03 am to Erin Go Bragh
quote:
You didn't vote for the various heads of federal agencies or any member of the Supreme court.
Liberals love administrative law agencies. unelected policy makers. Going to be tough to square that with "I didn't vote for ivanka"
Posted on 7/10/17 at 9:03 am to DelU249
quote:
Does anyone else think President Trump might benefit from reading Aesop's Fables? The Cat, The Rooster & The Mouse? The Eagle and The Arrow?
quote:
Good morning Mr. President. It would never have occurred to my mother or my father to ask me. Were you giving our country away? Hoping not.
Posted on 7/10/17 at 9:03 am to the808bass
quote:
You probably weren't politically aware in 1993
Yeah, actually I was
Posted on 7/10/17 at 9:03 am to notsince98
quote:
In case you aren't aware it is common for leaders to have someone sit for them when they go into meetings elsewhere.
True, but traditionally it's someone a little higher up the chain. In foreign meetings, the Sec of State, NSA advisor, ambassador, etc.
This isn't as big of a deal as liberals are making it, but a little bit bigger of a deal than conservatives are making it. Par for the course.
Posted on 7/10/17 at 9:04 am to the808bass
quote:
You probably weren't politically aware in 1993. But Hillary was writing healthcare policy then
Like I said, so much packed into 140 characters
Posted on 7/10/17 at 9:05 am to DelU249
quote:
Yeah, naming your brother attorney general is much worse than having your daughter sit down while you take a leak
Again, what does that have to do with 2017? It's not like I was working on the Kennedy campaign. Deflect a little more.
Posted on 7/10/17 at 9:06 am to The Spleen
quote:
This isn't as big of a deal as liberals are making it, but a little bit bigger of a deal than conservatives are making it. Par for the course.
Exactly.
Posted on 7/10/17 at 9:07 am to DelU249
Although I wish he would lose his phone, I can remember Hilary Clinton essentially framing the Universal Healthcare Act back in 1993 and she held no official capacity with our government other being married to the President. So, he's not wrong, but damn!
Posted on 7/10/17 at 9:08 am to DelU249
He should tweet back at her and ask if she's ever met Web Hubble.
That would keep the media busy for about a year.
That would keep the media busy for about a year.
Page 2 of 6
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News