Started By
Message

re: .

Posted on 4/21/17 at 1:14 pm to
Posted by skullhawk
My house
Member since Nov 2007
23043 posts
Posted on 4/21/17 at 1:14 pm to
quote:

Can you imagine the monies saved by abolishing the IRS


around $12 billion

quote:

simplifying taxes


You would eliminate the tax preparation industry but I don't think that saves the fed gov any money. It would actually cost the fed gov revenues.
Posted by germandawg
Member since Sep 2012
14135 posts
Posted on 4/21/17 at 1:16 pm to
quote:

The payroll tax is just the percentage of your income that goes straight to the federal governement to pay for SS and Medicare. 7.65%.


It is actually double that....that is what your employer withholds and remits from your salary. You are paying 15.3% out of your pocket...your employer does not "give" or "donate" anything to you unless of course they are an idiot....
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
57244 posts
Posted on 4/21/17 at 1:16 pm to
quote:

Seems like the middle class is going to get a pretty substantial tax increase
Needed. And inevitable. That's where the money is.
Posted by JOJO Hammer
Member since Nov 2010
11920 posts
Posted on 4/21/17 at 1:19 pm to
Why not keep it very simple and eliminate deductions. Everyone pays 9% for example. Now the family of 4 making 100k pays $9000 in taxes. So simple we can eliminate or significantly reduce the size of the IRS and save money.
Posted by cahoots
Member since Jan 2009
9134 posts
Posted on 4/21/17 at 1:20 pm to
quote:

It is actually double that....that is what your employer withholds and remits from your salary. You are paying 15.3% out of your pocket...your employer does not "give" or "donate" anything to you unless of course they are an idiot....


Look at your paycheck. You only pay 7.65%. Your employer pays the same amount but it doesn't come out of your earnings.
Posted by tedmarkuson
texas
Member since Feb 2015
2592 posts
Posted on 4/21/17 at 1:27 pm to
quote:

AGI = $100,000
Standard deduction = 12,700
Exemptions = 8,100
Taxable income = 79,200
Child credits = 2,000
Net tax liability = $9,278 or 9.278%


your numbers are wrong.

first household income is not AGI, AGI would be income after a 401k and employee contribution for benefits.

lets assume 8k and 6k fair enough?

that means your AGI is $86,000.

for dependents you're not counting yourself and your wife. you have 4 total dependents not 2 and the standard deduction is $12,600 not 12.7k meaning total adjustments to income would be $28,800.00 and the amount they would pay tax on line 43 of your 1040 is $57,200.00. your taxes owed would be $7,656.00 subtract from that $2,000.00 for the child tax credit for a total tax liability of $5,656.00 or an effective tax rate of 5%.

5% on a hundred grand and let's be clear that's a maximum number, if this couple itemizes deducting state and property tax and mortgage interest it's more likely that their effective rate is closer to 3%.

by the way your example family pays more in social security tax than they do in income tax.
This post was edited on 4/21/17 at 1:28 pm
Posted by cahoots
Member since Jan 2009
9134 posts
Posted on 4/21/17 at 1:29 pm to
quote:

Needed. And inevitable. That's where the money is.


Oh I'm well aware. That's what I was trying to demonstrate in this thread. A flat tax will shift the tax burden to the middle class.
Posted by Antonio Moss
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2006
48313 posts
Posted on 4/21/17 at 1:31 pm to
quote:

Doesn't that kinda defeat the purpose of a flat tax?


No

quote:

huge percentage of Americans would pay $0 income taxes if you exempted the first $30,000
.

So?

And I'd set the rate at 17%
Posted by alphaandomega
Tuscaloosa
Member since Aug 2012
13548 posts
Posted on 4/21/17 at 1:31 pm to
quote:

not if you make the first $30,000 every person makes tax free.




Everyone should pay something.
Posted by cahoots
Member since Jan 2009
9134 posts
Posted on 4/21/17 at 1:34 pm to
quote:

first household income is not AGI, AGI would be income after a 401k and employee contribution for benefits.

lets assume 8k and 6k fair enough?

that means your AGI is $86,000.


Yep I know. I was being conservative by not counting 401Ks and stuff.

You're right, a family of 4 making 100K could easily pay less than 5%.
This post was edited on 4/21/17 at 1:35 pm
Posted by Antonio Moss
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2006
48313 posts
Posted on 4/21/17 at 1:37 pm to
quote:



Everyone should pay something.



This is the right's version of "fair share." It's basically hollow, not thought out, and all about using the tax code in a punitive manner
Posted by cahoots
Member since Jan 2009
9134 posts
Posted on 4/21/17 at 1:37 pm to
quote:

.
So?

And I'd set the rate at 17%


Fine. I'm just pointing out that a lot of middle income Americans are going to pay even more under a flat tax system. Depending on how you structure it, they are definitely taking on a larger tax burden.
Posted by Antonio Moss
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2006
48313 posts
Posted on 4/21/17 at 1:39 pm to
quote:

I'm just pointing out that a lot of middle income Americans are going to pay even more under a flat tax system.


Nope. With a standard deduction of 25K or 30K and the elimination of payroll taxes, effective rates drop for the middle class
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
67089 posts
Posted on 4/21/17 at 1:40 pm to
It would be an improvement over what we have now, but we really should do away with the income tax all together.
Posted by Putty
Member since Oct 2003
25486 posts
Posted on 4/21/17 at 1:40 pm to
quote:

Are yall sure you want to do this?


I am...bout time you frickers start footing some more of the bill.
Posted by Machine
Earth
Member since May 2011
6001 posts
Posted on 4/21/17 at 1:40 pm to
abolish the income tax, eliminate corporate loopholes.

problem solved
Posted by skullhawk
My house
Member since Nov 2007
23043 posts
Posted on 4/21/17 at 1:43 pm to
quote:

abolish the income tax, eliminate corporate loopholes.


I agree that ideally we have no income tax. The idea of it makes my skin crawl but are there any good studies that back up your idea?

Can shielded corporate profits really fill the void of the income tax?
Posted by cahoots
Member since Jan 2009
9134 posts
Posted on 4/21/17 at 1:43 pm to
quote:



Nope. With a standard deduction of 25K or 30K and the elimination of payroll taxes, effective rates drop for the middle class


Some of the middle class.

If your household of 4 made $100K and 70K is taxable at 17%, that family is going to pay more than they currently do.
Posted by 50_Tiger
Dallas TX
Member since Jan 2016
40094 posts
Posted on 4/21/17 at 1:57 pm to
What if you make 100k and have no kids.

I guess were just expected to bend over right?
Posted by Antonio Moss
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2006
48313 posts
Posted on 4/21/17 at 1:58 pm to
quote:

If your household of 4 made $100K and 70K is taxable at 17%, that family is going to pay more than they currently do.


The average total federal effective rate for 100K incomes fell between 13.3% and 16.8%.

Under this plan it's 12.75%
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram