Started By
Message

re: .

Posted on 9/4/14 at 4:44 am to
Posted by woodoo
Houston
Member since Aug 2005
351 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 4:44 am to
I find it odd, regardless of the origin of the gay, that >50% of the dudes develop a lisp and female mannerisms when the choose/discover their homosexuality.

Do these gay animals react the same way?
Posted by bencoleman
RIP 7/19
Member since Feb 2009
37887 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 4:52 am to
Just like you don't choose to be a dumbass they don't choose to be gay.
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 4:55 am to
People really aren't getting the just of this

I don't think it's a choice

That doesn't mean it is a matter of fact. That's the point. We don't know
Posted by bencoleman
RIP 7/19
Member since Feb 2009
37887 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 5:03 am to
quote:

the just of this






Refer to my earlier post.
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 5:07 am to
An obvious autocorrect.

How is the belief that it is a choice any less credible as the belief in genetic predisposition?

PROVE that's it's not a choice.
Posted by lsuroadie
South LA
Member since Oct 2007
8396 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 5:40 am to
quote:

I find it odd, regardless of the origin of the gay, that >50% of the dudes develop a lisp and female mannerisms when the choose/discover their homosexuality.


winner winner chicken dinner.

he was born like this....yep, uh huh




Posted by tossedoff
LP
Member since May 2009
1516 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 6:07 am to
Why do you care? How does it affect you whether it is a choice or not?
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111508 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 6:24 am to
quote:

I don't think you're lying at all and your story clearly supports the argument that it is not a choice.

It is being interpreted as there's no choice. It's not apparent that's a foregone conclusion. A certain predisposition to the "feminine," either in art, aesthetics, mannerisms or any other number of characteristics doesn't necessarily demonstrate that homosexuality has no component of choice nor that nurture plays no role.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111508 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 6:30 am to
quote:

you want me to keep going or you want to start walking this back or start on your ridiculous definition of "dominance"?

It's not a ridiculous definition. He may have overstated the case or prevalence, but you're overstating your case as well. Very, very few animals engage solely in "homosexual" behavior. And ascribing human qualities to or taking human analogies from the activity of animals is fraught with numerous difficulties which serious zoologists readily admit.
Posted by woodoo
Houston
Member since Aug 2005
351 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 6:52 am to
The burden of proof is on the "born that way" theory. Until then, it's a choice.

A choice that a small % homosapiens make. Roughly twice that of the albino population. See any albinos lately?
Posted by Bestbank Tiger
Premium Member
Member since Jan 2005
71013 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 6:54 am to
Yeah, I'm sure plenty of guys who are attracted to women just wake up one morning and decide they want to smoke a pole or take it up the wazoo instead. Makes perfect sense.
Posted by STEVED00
Member since May 2007
22375 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 6:55 am to
I hear the genetic argument all the time so it got me thinking what about homosexuality and identical twins. Identical twins share the same genetic code so you would think if one is "born gay" then the other would be too.

I searched the google machine and it appears scientists have studied this and at least this article says homosexuality does not appear to be genetically hardwired FWIW
Gay/Identical Twin Study
Posted by catholictigerfan
Member since Oct 2009
56010 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 6:59 am to
I believe it has a lot to do with upbringing. I would find it very hard to believe that you simply just wake up one morning and say I think I'm going to be attracted to men today.

edit: acting on homosexual attractions is clearly a choice, but the question is, if someone has sexual attraction to the same sex, did they wake up in the morning and choose to look at the same sex that way, or is it something outside of their control that caused them to look at the same sex that way. Actually you could say the same thing with opposite sex sexual attraction. Straight people don't wake up and say I'm going to be attracted to the opposite sex.
This post was edited on 9/4/14 at 7:06 am
Posted by catholictigerfan
Member since Oct 2009
56010 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 7:02 am to
quote:

I hear the genetic argument all the time so it got me thinking what about homosexuality and identical twins. Identical twins share the same genetic code so you would think if one is "born gay" then the other would be too.



just because you aren't born that way doesn't mean you make a choice. Many things in our lives are determined not how we were born but how we grew up.

Many of us have a deep love for LSU because our parents did. While there is some choice there, it's kinda hardwired in us to love LSU. But nothing in our DNA or or genetics makes it that we will love LSU. This is kinda what it is like for sexual attractions just a little bit deeper and a lot more complicated.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111508 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 7:03 am to
quote:

I believe it has a lot to do with upbringing. I would find it very hard to believe that you simply just wake up one morning and say I think I'm going to be attracted to men today.

Reducing the question to "choice" creates a false choice of "choice" or "not choice." It's obviously not that simple.
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 7:04 am to
It's not that I care

1. I see it presented as a matter of scientific fact. Right now it's not.

2. It is a fascinating question.
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 7:06 am to
[quote]just because you aren't born that way doesn't mean you make a choice. Many things in our lives are determined not how we were born but how we grew up. [/quote

This. But again. I think in the end we'll have an answer in our lifetime. I'm not sure what it will accomplish. I don't see how it's relevant to the gay marriage debate
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 7:07 am to
Agree but the popular phrase "I was born this way" comes to mind. I believe you are, but there is simply no definitive answer.
Posted by HubbaBubba
F_uck Joe Biden, TX
Member since Oct 2010
45726 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 7:08 am to
quote:

Of all the things we associate with the porn industry—dead-eyed women, STIs, and rampant drug addiction—tolerance is rarely mentioned. After all, the entire point of porn is that someone—usually female—is being degraded. But a study in the journal Communication Research found that those who regularly indulge in porn may be more tolerant than those who do not.

According to the researchers, there’s a link between the amount of porn someone watches and how accepting they are of gay marriage.The theory goes that exposure to the world of Internet porn—where anything can and must have sex with everything else, on one page or another—teaches straight men to be more accepting of non-traditional couplings. Once they’ve made the cognitive leap that not all sex has to be strictly hetero, the next step in acceptance—”therefore gay marriage is fine”—comes more easily. It sounds absurd, but Communication Research is a proper academic journal, so either they’re onto something, or some college professor is now laughing at all the academics he just successfully trolled.

I guess all you guys supporting gay marriage are also huge online porn addicts, then. Which leads me to mention this....

quote:

It sounds contradictory, but straight men apparently enjoy looking at penises almost as much as they do vaginas. As part of their research for their book A Billion Wicked Thoughts, Sai Gaddam and Ogi Ogas—those two again—ranked Internet searches in terms of popularity from their NSA-sized database. Their results showed that search terms for female genitalia are only just more popular than search terms for male genitalia, by a factor so small there’s practically zero difference.

So I guess if you're all big fans of porn, then you're also a big fan of watching dicks, which leads me to....

quote:

A couple of years ago, two neuroscientists, Sai Gaddam and Ogi Ogas, decided to analyze roughly 1 billion Internet searches from over 100 million people and publish the results of this masochistic experiment. What they found was that transgender porn is the fourth-most popular type of adult website on the entire Internet, and its audience is overwhelmingly male and heterosexual. This agrees with a recent study done by Northwestern University, which claimed that over half the male audience for transgender porn was straight, with the second-largest group, bisexuals, accounting for only 41 percent. In other words, a huge number of guys apparently like their women equipped with something extra.

So.... Not only do the pro gay marriage types here like to check out dick, a big percentage dig on those dicks being on chicks!

Just setting the record straight for those who think they are.

LINK
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
123869 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 7:09 am to
quote:

This is kinda what it is like for sexual attractions just a little bit deeper and a lot more complicated.
Now, how does that differ from something like schizophrenia?
Or perhaps schizophrenia is a choice too?

How does it differ from something like autism?

Or major depression?

Or anorexia?

Or sexuality pre and post puberty?

This post was edited on 9/4/14 at 7:11 am
Jump to page
Page First 3 4 5 6 7 ... 10
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 10Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram