- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: To what do you attribute the overwhelming negative media coverage towards Trump?
Posted on 8/3/17 at 10:18 am to ScottFowler
Posted on 8/3/17 at 10:18 am to ScottFowler
quote:
I am sure some older types than me can remember slants against Reagan. I was too young to notice at the time.
The press loved Reagan and there was very little negative feedback on him, even after he flatly lied about trading arms for hostages with Iran.
Reagan still has a good press he in no way deserves.
He always lied, took the low road and avoided tough decisions.
That Time Ronald Reagan opened Iran and Illegally sold Khomeini Weapons
By Juan Cole | Jul. 14, 2015 |
By Juan Cole | (Informed Comment) | – –
The Reagan administration in the 1980s was buffeted by two policy drives toward Iran. On the one hand, Reagan ally Saudi Arabia supported Iraq, which illegally launched a war on the Islamic Republic of Iran in 1980 in order to steal its oil-rich Khuzistan Province. Reagan in 1983 sent Donald Rumsfeld, then CEO of Searle pharmaceuticals, to make friends with Saddam Hussein in Iraq.
From the other side, a section of the Israeli security establishment wanted Reagan to side with Iran against Iraq and to provide Iran weaponry. Before the 1979 Islamic Revolution, Iran had been a major supplier of petroleum to Israel, which was boycotted by the Arab League (Iran is not an Arab country). Israel feared Iraq more than it did non-Arab Iran in that decade. After the 1979 revolution, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini began denouncing Israel and saying he hoped it would vanish from the arena of time. But Iran was at war with Iraq and had mainly American weapons systems, for which it needed spare parts. The US was boycotting Iran, but Israel had reverse-engineered US spare parts and was manufacturing them, and was happy to trade them to Iran in return for petroleum. The Ayatollahs quietly made the deal, since without spare parts their tanks and armored vehicles and F-14s were so much junk."
...At the same time, to prolong the war and make sure no regional power obtained an absolute victory, Reagan shared satellite photos of Iraqi positions with Iran. On the advice of Israeli official David Kimche, he sent his national security adviser Bud McFarlane to try to establish relations with Khomenei and with then Speaker of Parliament Akbar Rafsanjani. McFarlane brought a Bible and a cake in the shape of a key to symbolize Reagan’s hope of opening Iran.
Then Reagan had his people steal hundreds of T.O.W. anti-tank missiles from the Pentagon warehouses and illegally ship them to Khomeini’s Iran, then on the US terrorist watch-list.
Let me just underline this. Reagan was prevented by law from selling US weaponry to Iran, and certainly without notifying Congress under the Arms Export Act. There was no aboveboard, legitimate way to do this. So he just had his people pilfer expensive weaponry and ship it to Iran. A notorious Israeli arms dealer was the intermediary.
Note, too, just for the annals of perfidy, that Reagan was at the same time militarily supporting Iraq, and had told Baghdad they were his allies."
LINK
This post was edited on 8/3/17 at 10:24 am
Posted on 8/3/17 at 10:19 am to WaveHog
quote:
TARP, dodd-frank, huge stimulus package, Paris Accord, Iran nuclear deal, just off the top of my head, are all pretty big.
TARP belongs to Bush.
Dodd-Frank is shite.
Stimulus package was a complete waste of money.
The Paris Accord is over.
The Iran nuclear deal will prove to be a colossal mistake.
Posted on 8/3/17 at 10:23 am to The Pirate King
quote:
Generally you're seeing several networks with 90%+ of negative coverage towards Trump since election.
We're talking about people who were literally in tears on election night.
If you watched people crying or flaming angry on election night and thought they might be straight in their coverage thereafter, you'd have to be crazy.
Posted on 8/3/17 at 11:02 am to Errerrerrwere
quote:
Errerrerrwere
moron. That isn't what it says.
quote:
The economy has added more than 9 million jobs, and the jobless rate has dropped to below the historical median.
The number of long-term unemployed Americans has dropped by 614,000 under Obama, but it is still 761,000 higher than at the start of the Great Recession.
It's like you don't even try.
Posted on 8/3/17 at 11:05 am to The Pirate King
They thought they could pick the next President. He proved them wrong.
Posted on 8/3/17 at 11:19 am to WhiskeyPapa
quote:
would be a double whammy for the war mongers on Wall Street if we went to war with Russia. They would make lots of
War with Russia is lunacy. Wall Street would be obliterated. All the war mongering in the world would be needed to push us into that fight. The risk of nukes coming out make it far too great a risk overall. Plenty of smaller asses to kick out there than to war with Russia and watch the whole world burn.
Posted on 8/3/17 at 11:24 am to The Pirate King
HE IS A FU*KING MORON.
Posted on 8/3/17 at 11:28 am to The Pirate King
Overwhelming negative coverage tends to happen when there's overwhelming incompetence being shown on a day to day basis.
Posted on 8/3/17 at 11:29 am to The Pirate King
quote:Going out on a limb here, but when you are looking to establish a relationship with the media, perhaps it is not a good idea to invite them to a meeting where you just tear into them for an hour. Then proceed to mock and attack them every day until your inauguration.
To what do you attribute the overwhelming negative media coverage towards Trump?
Posted on 8/3/17 at 11:30 am to The Pirate King
18 months ago, everyone in the MSM was laughing at Donald Trump. They were all saying, "There is zero percent chance that Donald Trump will be elected President of the United States."
They said this right up until the election. When Donald Trump won, they had to eat crow. Everything the mainstream media has been doing since then has been to prove that he shouldn't be the POTUS and that their assessment of him was correct. They are not interested in seeing him succeed or even do the best job given the limitations they say he has. They want to see him fail spectacularly.
They said this right up until the election. When Donald Trump won, they had to eat crow. Everything the mainstream media has been doing since then has been to prove that he shouldn't be the POTUS and that their assessment of him was correct. They are not interested in seeing him succeed or even do the best job given the limitations they say he has. They want to see him fail spectacularly.
Posted on 8/3/17 at 11:31 am to The Pirate King
The powers that be had a vision of post-Obama America, Trump is not that. Plus, he hits them back.
Posted on 8/3/17 at 11:52 am to The Pirate King
Well when well over 90% of the press falls under one particular ideology, they are going to be overwhelmingly negative when someone who does not follow their ideology sits in the oval office.
It's really not all that surprising. What is surprising and sad is that so much of the populace still thinks the press is objective or "neutral" in its coverage. Just look at the proggies on this board and their reaction.
It's really not all that surprising. What is surprising and sad is that so much of the populace still thinks the press is objective or "neutral" in its coverage. Just look at the proggies on this board and their reaction.
Posted on 8/3/17 at 12:00 pm to The Pirate King
If coach Ogeron has a terrible season as LSU coach next season and gets blasted by the press, will you blame that on the press?
If someone could explain why 7 months into his administration he has very few of his people in office I'd be happy to hear it.
This is just one example. And you guys blame the media for this? Trump just seems like a terrible boss and manager. Totally erratic and disorganized and not folloing flow charts. I'm sorry you can't blame the media for his mistakes.
Nominate a staff for God's sakes -
LINK /
If someone could explain why 7 months into his administration he has very few of his people in office I'd be happy to hear it.
This is just one example. And you guys blame the media for this? Trump just seems like a terrible boss and manager. Totally erratic and disorganized and not folloing flow charts. I'm sorry you can't blame the media for his mistakes.
Nominate a staff for God's sakes -
LINK /
Posted on 8/3/17 at 1:09 pm to LSU alum wannabe
quote:
would be a double whammy for the war mongers on Wall Street if we went to war with Russia. They would make lots of
War with Russia is lunacy. Wall Street would be obliterated. All the war mongering in the world would be needed to push us into that fight. The risk of nukes coming out make it far too great a risk overall. Plenty of smaller asses to kick out there than to war with Russia and watch the whole world burn.
Well, look at this way. Wall Street made out like bandits when we invaded Iraq. Our Military probably thinks it can wipe the floor with the Russians. Nukes coming out is really off the table. It always was. No possible outcome could make using new-clear weapons look desirable.
Back in WWII Hitler's flunkies suggested that the allied armies massing in southern England for operation OVERLORD would make a good target for chemical weapons, which the Germans had, and they had delivery means too.
-EVEN- Adolf Hitler shied away from WMD use. He knew the Allies could make it ten times worse on Germany.
Posted on 8/3/17 at 1:11 pm to The Pirate King
It is because all the MSM outlets are owned by devil NWO people who seek your destruction. Simple as that.
Posted on 8/3/17 at 1:38 pm to The Pirate King
He is news.
He is the central figure of the alt-right cult.
Once he bragged he grabbed pussy, and then claimed it was just a lie ("just locker room talk" ie not truth about him), then everything he says or does is under microscope.
Spicer is gone for the crime of atttempting to make sense of this wh.
He is the central figure of the alt-right cult.
Once he bragged he grabbed pussy, and then claimed it was just a lie ("just locker room talk" ie not truth about him), then everything he says or does is under microscope.
Spicer is gone for the crime of atttempting to make sense of this wh.
This post was edited on 8/3/17 at 1:39 pm
Posted on 8/3/17 at 1:43 pm to WhiskeyPapa
quote:
The press loved Reagan and there was very little negative feedback on him
False. The press hated Reagan. He was a senile B grade actor and a white racist who wanted to kill old people, women and poor people. The only reason he wasn't hated by cable TV news talk is because it did not exist.
This post was edited on 8/3/17 at 1:44 pm
Posted on 8/3/17 at 3:02 pm to The Pirate King
Collusion of the media with Cultural Marxism.
Posted on 8/3/17 at 3:04 pm to The Pirate King
The media is part of the swamp. They don't like draining.
Posted on 8/3/17 at 3:11 pm to The Pirate King
70% of the Wall Street Journal Trump articles are negative.
Based on that, what do you think the ratio should be for a neutral, non-biased media outlet?
What, about 80% ?
Based on that, what do you think the ratio should be for a neutral, non-biased media outlet?
What, about 80% ?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News