Started By
Message

re: To what do you attribute the overwhelming negative media coverage towards Trump?

Posted on 8/3/17 at 10:18 am to
Posted by WhiskeyPapa
Member since Aug 2016
9277 posts
Posted on 8/3/17 at 10:18 am to
quote:

I am sure some older types than me can remember slants against Reagan. I was too young to notice at the time.


The press loved Reagan and there was very little negative feedback on him, even after he flatly lied about trading arms for hostages with Iran.





Reagan still has a good press he in no way deserves.

He always lied, took the low road and avoided tough decisions.

That Time Ronald Reagan opened Iran and Illegally sold Khomeini Weapons
By Juan Cole | Jul. 14, 2015 |

By Juan Cole | (Informed Comment) | – –

The Reagan administration in the 1980s was buffeted by two policy drives toward Iran. On the one hand, Reagan ally Saudi Arabia supported Iraq, which illegally launched a war on the Islamic Republic of Iran in 1980 in order to steal its oil-rich Khuzistan Province. Reagan in 1983 sent Donald Rumsfeld, then CEO of Searle pharmaceuticals, to make friends with Saddam Hussein in Iraq.


From the other side, a section of the Israeli security establishment wanted Reagan to side with Iran against Iraq and to provide Iran weaponry. Before the 1979 Islamic Revolution, Iran had been a major supplier of petroleum to Israel, which was boycotted by the Arab League (Iran is not an Arab country). Israel feared Iraq more than it did non-Arab Iran in that decade. After the 1979 revolution, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini began denouncing Israel and saying he hoped it would vanish from the arena of time. But Iran was at war with Iraq and had mainly American weapons systems, for which it needed spare parts. The US was boycotting Iran, but Israel had reverse-engineered US spare parts and was manufacturing them, and was happy to trade them to Iran in return for petroleum. The Ayatollahs quietly made the deal, since without spare parts their tanks and armored vehicles and F-14s were so much junk."

...At the same time, to prolong the war and make sure no regional power obtained an absolute victory, Reagan shared satellite photos of Iraqi positions with Iran. On the advice of Israeli official David Kimche, he sent his national security adviser Bud McFarlane to try to establish relations with Khomenei and with then Speaker of Parliament Akbar Rafsanjani. McFarlane brought a Bible and a cake in the shape of a key to symbolize Reagan’s hope of opening Iran.
Then Reagan had his people steal hundreds of T.O.W. anti-tank missiles from the Pentagon warehouses and illegally ship them to Khomeini’s Iran, then on the US terrorist watch-list.

Let me just underline this. Reagan was prevented by law from selling US weaponry to Iran, and certainly without notifying Congress under the Arms Export Act. There was no aboveboard, legitimate way to do this. So he just had his people pilfer expensive weaponry and ship it to Iran. A notorious Israeli arms dealer was the intermediary.

Note, too, just for the annals of perfidy, that Reagan was at the same time militarily supporting Iraq, and had told Baghdad they were his allies."

LINK
This post was edited on 8/3/17 at 10:24 am
Posted by Pinecone Repair
Burminham
Member since Nov 2013
7156 posts
Posted on 8/3/17 at 10:19 am to
quote:

TARP, dodd-frank, huge stimulus package, Paris Accord, Iran nuclear deal, just off the top of my head, are all pretty big.


TARP belongs to Bush.
Dodd-Frank is shite.
Stimulus package was a complete waste of money.

The Paris Accord is over.
The Iran nuclear deal will prove to be a colossal mistake.
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 8/3/17 at 10:23 am to
quote:

Generally you're seeing several networks with 90%+ of negative coverage towards Trump since election.

We're talking about people who were literally in tears on election night.

If you watched people crying or flaming angry on election night and thought they might be straight in their coverage thereafter, you'd have to be crazy.
Posted by Hawkeye95
Member since Dec 2013
20293 posts
Posted on 8/3/17 at 11:02 am to
quote:

Errerrerrwere


moron. That isn't what it says.

quote:

The economy has added more than 9 million jobs, and the jobless rate has dropped to below the historical median.
The number of long-term unemployed Americans has dropped by 614,000 under Obama, but it is still 761,000 higher than at the start of the Great Recession.


It's like you don't even try.
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
50375 posts
Posted on 8/3/17 at 11:05 am to
They thought they could pick the next President. He proved them wrong.
Posted by LSU alum wannabe
Katy, TX
Member since Jan 2004
26973 posts
Posted on 8/3/17 at 11:19 am to
quote:

would be a double whammy for the war mongers on Wall Street if we went to war with Russia. They would make lots of


War with Russia is lunacy. Wall Street would be obliterated. All the war mongering in the world would be needed to push us into that fight. The risk of nukes coming out make it far too great a risk overall. Plenty of smaller asses to kick out there than to war with Russia and watch the whole world burn.
Posted by TheLSUTiger
Member since Dec 2011
594 posts
Posted on 8/3/17 at 11:24 am to
HE IS A FU*KING MORON.
Posted by Volatile
Tennessee
Member since Apr 2014
5471 posts
Posted on 8/3/17 at 11:28 am to
Overwhelming negative coverage tends to happen when there's overwhelming incompetence being shown on a day to day basis.
Posted by mmcgrath
Indianapolis
Member since Feb 2010
35377 posts
Posted on 8/3/17 at 11:29 am to
quote:

To what do you attribute the overwhelming negative media coverage towards Trump?
Going out on a limb here, but when you are looking to establish a relationship with the media, perhaps it is not a good idea to invite them to a meeting where you just tear into them for an hour. Then proceed to mock and attack them every day until your inauguration.
Posted by Jax-Tiger
Port Saint Lucie, FL
Member since Jan 2005
24738 posts
Posted on 8/3/17 at 11:30 am to
18 months ago, everyone in the MSM was laughing at Donald Trump. They were all saying, "There is zero percent chance that Donald Trump will be elected President of the United States."

They said this right up until the election. When Donald Trump won, they had to eat crow. Everything the mainstream media has been doing since then has been to prove that he shouldn't be the POTUS and that their assessment of him was correct. They are not interested in seeing him succeed or even do the best job given the limitations they say he has. They want to see him fail spectacularly.
Posted by WW
Member since Dec 2013
2280 posts
Posted on 8/3/17 at 11:31 am to
The powers that be had a vision of post-Obama America, Trump is not that. Plus, he hits them back.
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
43319 posts
Posted on 8/3/17 at 11:52 am to
Well when well over 90% of the press falls under one particular ideology, they are going to be overwhelmingly negative when someone who does not follow their ideology sits in the oval office.

It's really not all that surprising. What is surprising and sad is that so much of the populace still thinks the press is objective or "neutral" in its coverage. Just look at the proggies on this board and their reaction.
Posted by Eurocat
Member since Apr 2004
15036 posts
Posted on 8/3/17 at 12:00 pm to
If coach Ogeron has a terrible season as LSU coach next season and gets blasted by the press, will you blame that on the press?

If someone could explain why 7 months into his administration he has very few of his people in office I'd be happy to hear it.

This is just one example. And you guys blame the media for this? Trump just seems like a terrible boss and manager. Totally erratic and disorganized and not folloing flow charts. I'm sorry you can't blame the media for his mistakes.

Nominate a staff for God's sakes -

LINK /
Posted by WhiskeyPapa
Member since Aug 2016
9277 posts
Posted on 8/3/17 at 1:09 pm to
quote:

would be a double whammy for the war mongers on Wall Street if we went to war with Russia. They would make lots of

War with Russia is lunacy. Wall Street would be obliterated. All the war mongering in the world would be needed to push us into that fight. The risk of nukes coming out make it far too great a risk overall. Plenty of smaller asses to kick out there than to war with Russia and watch the whole world burn.


Well, look at this way. Wall Street made out like bandits when we invaded Iraq. Our Military probably thinks it can wipe the floor with the Russians. Nukes coming out is really off the table. It always was. No possible outcome could make using new-clear weapons look desirable.

Back in WWII Hitler's flunkies suggested that the allied armies massing in southern England for operation OVERLORD would make a good target for chemical weapons, which the Germans had, and they had delivery means too.

-EVEN- Adolf Hitler shied away from WMD use. He knew the Allies could make it ten times worse on Germany.
Posted by omegaman66
greenwell springs
Member since Oct 2007
22777 posts
Posted on 8/3/17 at 1:11 pm to
It is because all the MSM outlets are owned by devil NWO people who seek your destruction. Simple as that.
Posted by CelticDog
Member since Apr 2015
42867 posts
Posted on 8/3/17 at 1:38 pm to
He is news.
He is the central figure of the alt-right cult.

Once he bragged he grabbed pussy, and then claimed it was just a lie ("just locker room talk" ie not truth about him), then everything he says or does is under microscope.
Spicer is gone for the crime of atttempting to make sense of this wh.

This post was edited on 8/3/17 at 1:39 pm
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
112428 posts
Posted on 8/3/17 at 1:43 pm to
quote:

The press loved Reagan and there was very little negative feedback on him


False. The press hated Reagan. He was a senile B grade actor and a white racist who wanted to kill old people, women and poor people. The only reason he wasn't hated by cable TV news talk is because it did not exist.
This post was edited on 8/3/17 at 1:44 pm
Posted by CarrolltonTiger
New Orleans
Member since Aug 2005
50291 posts
Posted on 8/3/17 at 3:02 pm to
Collusion of the media with Cultural Marxism.
Posted by Oluja Ispred
Member since Jul 2017
50 posts
Posted on 8/3/17 at 3:04 pm to
The media is part of the swamp. They don't like draining.
Posted by Bullethead88
Half way between LSU and Tulane
Member since Dec 2009
4202 posts
Posted on 8/3/17 at 3:11 pm to
70% of the Wall Street Journal Trump articles are negative.

Based on that, what do you think the ratio should be for a neutral, non-biased media outlet?

What, about 80% ?

first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram