re: Those who support the injunction against Trump

Ironic huh? The libs hate America and put her down at every opportunity, yet we the only place that has all that "good" stuff that the little children need. Go fricking figure

quote:

---

Would you mind presenting us with the numbers of engineers and doctors versus non educated Syrians coming into the country? If not, then you need to STFU and quit screaming about all the engineers and doctors we're losing out on.

---

Do you really want to parse numbers?

quote:

---

Seems as if they need medical attention so badly they would be willing to find it as soon as possible to a doctor near them as opposed to a doctor halfway around the globe knowing it will take considerable time to clear hurdles to get here.

---

And if the care they can receive here is better than the care they can receive at home? And if they've already cleared those hurdles, and were on their way here when the ban was dropped into place?

Very weak arguments on your part.

quote:

---

we have no way of knowing that

---

Yes, we do.

I support the law. EOs aren't law. I support the constitution and our system of checks and balances are set up the way they are to prevent the Executive Branch from overstepping its authority.

I honestly don't care if the President's EO "made us safer" and the judge "made us less safe". The theoretical pursuit of increased safety from a threat that the President has blown out of proportion in order to solidify support from his simple minded base is not justification for ignoring law.

If the federal judge made a mistake it'll be corrected at a higher court. That's the way the system works.

There are way too many "Constitutional Conservatives" in this country and on this site that would be on board with giving Trump the power to do whatever the hell he wants with no checks to his power.

Your chance of being the victim of a terrorist attack is less than your God smiting you with lightning.

Stop being sheep.

The safety argument really is hollow when the countries included omit those most tied to us terrorist activity.

If trump was really the bold person people think he is and he claims to be then saudi arabia, uae, etc would be on the list.

Even in that scenario its highly questionable how effective and reasonable this is

quote:

---

How did we ever get to the point where Americans are more concerned for the needs of immigrants than the safety of its citizens?

---

Brother, at the core of liberalism is the destruction of America as we know it. They will support anything, ANYTHING, that undermines the fabric of this country and it's constitution. Death by 1M cuts.

They must be utterly destroyed, no doubt about this. We just have to find a way to do it surgically, if we can, in order to preserve what is good.

quote:

---

Your chances of being the victim of a terrorist attack is less

---

I thought the same thing back in the 60s about abortion becoming legal in the future. Boy was I wrong. I am not looking at this as something that might happen a week, a year of even five years from now but a bad attack here is going to happen. Terrorist's cells now in all 50 states. They ain't there by accident my friend.

But he's for liberty! No explanation needed!