- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
The Dims Didn't Wait Long - Feinstein to Introuce Bill to Ban Bump Stocks
Posted on 10/4/17 at 9:45 am
Posted on 10/4/17 at 9:45 am
quote:
Chad Pergram?Verified account @ChadPergram 11m11 minutes ago
Feinstein introducing bill to ban the sale, of bump stocks, trigger cranks that accelerate a semi-automatic rifle’s rate of fire
20
Posted on 10/4/17 at 9:49 am to MrLarson
The ONLY reason a bumpfire stock helped in this situation was because of the massed targets, usually full auto fire or bump fire isn't actually going to help a body count.
also, you can bumpfire with just your hands.
also, you can bumpfire with just your hands.
Posted on 10/4/17 at 9:50 am to sealawyer
quote:
also, you can bumpfire with just your hands
Sen. Feinstein introduces bill to ban hands.
Posted on 10/4/17 at 9:51 am to MrLarson
Banning this wouldn't be a big deal to me personally, but I know it won't end at this.
The goal is confiscation, so things like this must be opposed simply because giving them a victory here adds to their momemtum.
The goal is confiscation, so things like this must be opposed simply because giving them a victory here adds to their momemtum.
Posted on 10/4/17 at 9:51 am to MrLarson
quote:
The Dims Didn't Wait Long
Gotta strike when the melt is hottest
Posted on 10/4/17 at 9:53 am to sealawyer
Going to be interesting to see how exactly this is defended by the NRA. Full autos are heavily restricted. These devices are specifically made to make semi's function similarly to full auto as far as rate of fire goes. Kinda hard to defend in the context of current law.
This post was edited on 10/4/17 at 9:55 am
Posted on 10/4/17 at 9:54 am to sealawyer
quote:
The ONLY reason a bumpfire stock helped in this situation was because of the massed targets, usually full auto fire or bump fire isn't actually going to help a body count. also, you can bumpfire with just your hands.
True, I've seen YouTube vids of dudes shooting AR-15s unloading 30 rounds in less than 10 seconds.
I thought we would see a push to limit him many rounds in a clip, I'm sure that's next
Posted on 10/4/17 at 9:55 am to MrLarson
quote:
Bump Stocks
Another flashy, scary word that brain dead liberal vote bots can latch onto that is almost meaningless and not even a part of the problem.
Posted on 10/4/17 at 9:55 am to MrLarson
Thank God, because no bump stocks will mean no one will be murdered to death by guns ever again. 
The Far Left is beyond idiotic. JMO...
The Far Left is beyond idiotic. JMO...
Posted on 10/4/17 at 9:57 am to Bass Tiger
Ban fingers!
Posted on 10/4/17 at 9:59 am to Bass Tiger
quote:
clip
Posted on 10/4/17 at 10:00 am to MrLarson
quote:
The Dims Didn't Wait Long - Feinstein to Introuce Bill to Ban Bump Stocks
Support
Posted on 10/4/17 at 10:00 am to MrLarson
Next thing you know they will ban murder.....oh wait......
One thing these idiots don't seem to comprehend is that criminals, by definition, don't follow laws.
One thing these idiots don't seem to comprehend is that criminals, by definition, don't follow laws.
Posted on 10/4/17 at 10:01 am to MrLarson
Bump Stocks are dumb and wanting to ban them is even dumber.
Posted on 10/4/17 at 10:01 am to sealawyer
quote:
also, you can bumpfire with just your hands.
That's what I was thinking. Using the way you hold the gun to bumpfire isn't going to be useful unless it is a spray and pray situation like what the shooter had in Vegas.
Posted on 10/4/17 at 10:03 am to AUbused
quote:
Going to be interesting to see how exactly this is defended by the NRA. Full autos are illegal. These devices are specifically made to make semi's function similarly to full auto as far as rate of fire goes. Kinda hard to defend in the context of current law.
The problem I have is creating legislation as an emotional response. Especially coming from Diane Feinstein, she is an absolute loon when it comes to banning things on firearms.
Posted on 10/4/17 at 10:03 am to MrLarson
So what would change in this situation? He would have thought to himself “damn, it’s illegal for me to use a bump stock to commit mass murder, guess I’ll find something else to do today”? Or would he have though, “well, I guess mass murder is bad enough, I wouldn’t want to run amiss of Feinstein’s law against bump stocks, better not use them”?
Posted on 10/4/17 at 10:06 am to Jack Bauers HnK
Well, to start you wouldnt be able to buy a device that approximates a fully auto weapon down at Cabelas so maybe he doesnt go through the trouble or attempting to acquire one on the black market and tries to aim his shots or spray semi-auto. It seems likely that having that device enabled him to injure/kill more people since, as stated above, the crowd was densely massed making full auto a good choice for max damage. Or maybe he builds a bomb. Who knows.
This obviously wouldnt have stopped him from carrying out the attack.
This obviously wouldnt have stopped him from carrying out the attack.
This post was edited on 10/4/17 at 10:10 am
Posted on 10/4/17 at 10:08 am to MrLarson
quote:
The problem I have is creating legislation as an emotional response.
Understandable. I get people who think these devices and even full auto weapons themselves should be legal. My interest is the defense of devices specifically manufactured to turn semi-auto(legal) weapons into what are essentially fully auto(illegal) weapons within the context of current law. Seems like a tough sell.
Posted on 10/4/17 at 10:09 am to AUbused
quote:
Going to be interesting to see how exactly this is defended by the NRA. Full autos are heavily restricted. These devices are specifically made to make semi's function similarly to full auto as far as rate of fire goes. Kinda hard to defend in the context of current law.
The defense is that the laws regulating actual full auto weapons are pointless. Without those bull shite laws, you don't have people figuring out ways around them. If you ban bump fire stocks, someone will figure out a way around those.
Or... We could have freedom and liberty.
Page 1 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News