- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: St George organizers will stop disclosing how many petition signatures they have
Posted on 1/28/14 at 9:53 am to Tiger at Law
Posted on 1/28/14 at 9:53 am to Tiger at Law
quote:Why does that bother you?
It matters to Russian. Everything related to SG matters to Russian.
1
Posted on 1/28/14 at 9:57 am to LSURussian
Link to where I said it bothers me? 
I was responding to another poster's question, it doesn't bother me.
Does it bother you?
I was responding to another poster's question, it doesn't bother me.
Does it bother you?
This post was edited on 1/28/14 at 10:04 am
Posted on 1/28/14 at 10:00 am to LSURussian
quote:
Could you please give me some examples of the SG incorporation's transparency compared to other incorporation efforts?
Sarcasm
-------------
Your head
Posted on 1/28/14 at 10:01 am to Rickety Cricket
Fair enough. Sorry I missed it. 
Posted on 1/28/14 at 10:04 am to Tiger at Law
quote:Your own post is overwhelming evidence, law student, that it bothers you....
Link to where I said it bothers me?
quote:
Donated fundraiser at a nice restaurant=failure
10,000 petition signatures from an effort paid for out of concerned citizen's pockets=failure
Raise $18,000=failure Not releasing signature number tallies when such a release isn't required in any way=failure
Volunteer signature drive slowing over the holidays=failure
Of course, a link will be requested for when he ever said, verbatim, anything in my summary above.
Of course, that standard doesn't apply when Russian spins anything from the incorporation effort.
Get ready for 5 more pages in this thread, and who knows how many other threads, of tedious word parsing, failure declarations, and link requests!
Posted on 1/28/14 at 10:08 am to LSURussian
I don't equate making observations based on a subject I'm interested in with being bothered, but you are welcome to your opinion.
Posted on 1/28/14 at 10:09 am to Tiger at Law
quote:Your previous post contradicts this statement.
but you are welcome to your opinion.
Posted on 1/28/14 at 10:24 am to LSURussian
Back to word parsing,as I observed, and endless, mindless, circular arguing ...
Doubledeb posted a question. I responded by giving my observation. You asked why the content of my observation equaled me being bothered. I responded that I am not bothered and didn't say that I was bothered. You suggested that by making the observations that I made, and predictions for how this thread and others would go, that I had provided overwhelming evidence of being bothered. I disagreed but said you are welcome to your opinion...which brings us to your current statement:
Unless I am missing something, I still didn't say that I am bothered or that you are not welcome to your opinion.
My observation about the course of this thread doesn't seem too far off. Again, you are welcome to your opinion. However, that doesn't make your opinion correct.
Round and round...
Doubledeb posted a question. I responded by giving my observation. You asked why the content of my observation equaled me being bothered. I responded that I am not bothered and didn't say that I was bothered. You suggested that by making the observations that I made, and predictions for how this thread and others would go, that I had provided overwhelming evidence of being bothered. I disagreed but said you are welcome to your opinion...which brings us to your current statement:
quote:
Your previous post contradicts this statement.
Unless I am missing something, I still didn't say that I am bothered or that you are not welcome to your opinion.
My observation about the course of this thread doesn't seem too far off. Again, you are welcome to your opinion. However, that doesn't make your opinion correct.
Round and round...
Posted on 1/28/14 at 10:25 am to Tiger at Law
quote:You don't have to say it for it to be evident.
I still didn't say that I am bothered
Posted on 1/28/14 at 10:51 am to Tiger at Law
Does anyone else feel that the inevitable trajectory of these threads leads us to the Chewbacca defense?
Chewbacca Defense
Chewbacca Defense
Posted on 1/28/14 at 11:02 am to Tiger at Law
Your obvious attempts to hijack any SG thread are amusing.
This post was edited on 1/28/14 at 11:02 am
Posted on 1/28/14 at 11:24 am to LSURussian
quote:
Your obvious attempts to hijack any SG thread are amusing.
First thing that came to mind:
Second thing that comes to mind:
I think that between us, you are the one that is constantly hijacking or derailing the threads when you spiral other people's posts into some meaningless and endless side argument based on how they paraphrased a news article, or your numerous replies on related questions, or any number of other questions and issues bearing little to no connection to whatever the OP is about.
I don't think that you are the only one who does this, and of course I can't say if it is intentional or not, but it is something that happens continuously, like this side conversation based on my response to another poster's question...round and round
This post was edited on 1/28/14 at 11:39 am
Posted on 1/28/14 at 11:30 am to Tiger at Law
quote:When you respond to another poster but your entire response is devoted to criticizing me, I will reply.
like this side conversation based on my response to another poster's question
You're stupid to think otherwise.
Posted on 1/28/14 at 11:39 am to LSURussian
quote:
You're stupid to think otherwise.
Can you please just append this sentence to the end of all your posts? That way we're all starting on the same page.
Posted on 1/28/14 at 11:51 am to LSURussian
Do you disagree with the content of the response I gave to doubledeb or is the only item worthy of a reply your assertion that I am "bothered" by the observations I gave? I hoped that my observations may help doubledeb's and other posters' understanding of your posting pattern. If you think that a summary of your posting pattern, and the pattern of these topics in general, amounts to personal criticism, I don't have any response to that.
I thought it would be likely that you would reply, but I also thought the content of your reply would be based on the content of the post at issue rather than a circular argument based on my perceived level of being bothered. Perhaps I was stupid not to think otherwise...round and round, Chewbacca Chewbacca
I thought it would be likely that you would reply, but I also thought the content of your reply would be based on the content of the post at issue rather than a circular argument based on my perceived level of being bothered. Perhaps I was stupid not to think otherwise...round and round, Chewbacca Chewbacca
Posted on 1/28/14 at 12:14 pm to Tiger at Law
quote:For someone who bitches a great deal about going 'round and round' you sure do go round and round a lot.
Do you disagree with the content of the response I gave to doubledeb or is the only item worthy of a reply your assertion that I am "bothered" by the observations I gave? I hoped that my observations may help doubledeb's and other posters' understanding of your posting pattern. If you think that a summary of your posting pattern, and the pattern of these topics in general, amounts to personal criticism, I don't have any response to that.
I thought it would be likely that you would reply, but I also thought the content of your reply would be based on the content of the post at issue rather than a circular argument based on my perceived level of being bothered. Perhaps I was stupid not to think otherwise...round and round, Chewbacca Chewbacca
Posted on 1/28/14 at 12:36 pm to LSURussian
quote:
St George organizers
Why did they organize as a LLC and not a PAC?
Posted on 1/28/14 at 12:36 pm to Decatur
Page 6 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News