- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: St George organizers will stop disclosing how many petition signatures they have
Posted on 1/27/14 at 11:34 pm to homesicktiger
Posted on 1/27/14 at 11:34 pm to homesicktiger
quote:
I've finally updated my Poliboard cheat sheet.
Notice a common thread. All liberal.
2
Posted on 1/28/14 at 8:13 am to homesicktiger
quote:
Anything gay: Toddy Anything Israel: CT, trackfan LA Movie Industry: IB St. George: Russian
Darkhorse has started 5 times as many gay threads as Toddy lately.
Posted on 1/28/14 at 8:14 am to Oscar Kilo
quote:
Notice a common thread. All liberal.
This proves you're no alter.
Posted on 1/28/14 at 8:15 am to Vegas Bengal
quote:Well there ya go Toddy good, Darkhorse bad.
Darkhorse has started 5 times as many gay threads as Toddy lately.
Posted on 1/28/14 at 8:38 am to Oscar Kilo
quote:
Notice a common thread. All liberal.
Posted on 1/28/14 at 8:50 am to LSURussian
quote:
Do you seriously think they would not mention the attendance was all they could accommodate if that were the case?
And you know they didn't mention that because????????
It is a newspaper article, it isn't a press release, right?
And it really doesn't matter one way or another. They could have 10,000 people at the rally and if they can't get 18,000 signatures it's over.
Making a big deal out of how many the restaurant holds, or how many tickets were available, etc. is just so much BS. It's about signatures on a petition and not a fundraiser.
Posted on 1/28/14 at 8:52 am to doubleb
quote:
Making a big deal out of how many the restaurant holds, or how many tickets were available, etc. is just so much BS. It's about signatures on a petition and not a fundraiser.
It's an obvious attempt to put a negative spin on a successful fund raiser. That's all.
Posted on 1/28/14 at 8:54 am to doubleb
quote:Then why are the SG supporters making such a big deal out of it?
Making a big deal out of how many the restaurant holds, or how many tickets were available, etc. is just so much BS.
Posted on 1/28/14 at 8:59 am to LSURussian
quote:
Then why are the SG supporters making such a big deal out of it?
Where????
Posted on 1/28/14 at 9:00 am to doubleb
Don't play dumb.
Posted on 1/28/14 at 9:01 am to LSURussian
St. George is the most transparent incorporation movement in history.
Posted on 1/28/14 at 9:06 am to LSURussian
quote:
Don't play dumb.
I saw an article in yesterday's paper. So what?
You started this thread, no SG supporter even commented on the article or the event.
All of this nonsense is on you, it's not like a SG supporter was trumpeting a big event.
You are the one playing dumb.
Posted on 1/28/14 at 9:11 am to doubleb
quote:This thread is filled with SG supporters commenting on "the event." And they are especially shrill about defending the attendance number even to the point of making up stuff about the capacity of the venue. WTF are you talking about?
no SG supporter even commented on the article or the event.
quote:What nonsense?
All of this nonsense is on you
Posted on 1/28/14 at 9:12 am to Rickety Cricket
quote:Could you please give me some examples of the SG incorporation's transparency compared to other incorporation efforts?
St. George is the most transparent incorporation movement in history.
Posted on 1/28/14 at 9:15 am to LSURussian
quote:
Could you please give me some examples of the SG incorporation's transparency compared to other incorporation efforts?
I may be wrong, but I think he was being sarcastic, but who knows?
And does it matter????
Posted on 1/28/14 at 9:23 am to doubleb
quote:Probably not to you. But I'd like to learn about the process.
And does it matter????
Posted on 1/28/14 at 9:32 am to LSURussian
quote:
But I'd like to learn about the process.
The process is simple.
At the grassroots level people have been trying to start their own school district as Zachary and Central did. They have been rebuffed twice and were told a large reason for this is because they aren't a city.
Well these people are determined to start a school system so they decided to form a city.
They have been working to that end and started a petition drive.
They need a certain amount of signatures to hold an election of those in the proposed city. If an election is held the majority rules.
Are you up to speed now?
Posted on 1/28/14 at 9:34 am to doubleb
quote:
And does it matter????
It matters to Russian. Everything related to SG matters to Russian. Everything related to the incorporation effort must be spun in a negative light.
Donated fundraiser at a nice restaurant=failure
10,000 petition signatures from an effort paid for out of concerned citizen's pockets=failure
Raise $18,000=failure
Not releasing signature number tallies when such a release isn't required in any way=failure
Volunteer signature drive slowing over the holidays=failure
Of course, a link will be requested for when he ever said, verbatim, anything in my summary above. Of course, that standard doesn't apply when Russian spins anything from the incorporation effort.
Get ready for 5 more pages in this thread, and who knows how many other threads, of tedious word parsing, failure declarations, and link requests!
Posted on 1/28/14 at 9:36 am to LSURussian
Sorry posting
This post was edited on 1/28/14 at 9:42 am
Posted on 1/28/14 at 9:37 am to doubleb
A post so nice you made it twice?
Page 5 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News