Started By
Message

re: So this is allegedly the repeal gameplan

Posted on 7/25/17 at 10:12 am to
Posted by HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
Member since Feb 2017
12458 posts
Posted on 7/25/17 at 10:12 am to
quote:

Did you purposefully not bother to learn how this works, or are you deflecting for your Republican overlords?



Apparently it is you who doesn't know how things work if you really think this group of Senators is going to agree on anything related to the healthcare bill in the span of 2 days.

Posted by JuiceTerry
Roond the Scheme
Member since Apr 2013
40868 posts
Posted on 7/25/17 at 10:13 am to
Can't wait for the fireworks celebration and rose garden gala!
Posted by mahdragonz
Member since Jun 2013
6936 posts
Posted on 7/25/17 at 10:13 am to
quote:

Does this open up insurances across state lines?


There is no law preventing insurance from being sold across state lines.

Trumpkins fall for that as a the magic bullet. They must love being duped.
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
126962 posts
Posted on 7/25/17 at 10:16 am to
quote:

Can't wait for the fireworks celebration
I hear Hillary has a lot of leftover fireworks that might be available.....
Posted by BamaAtl
South of North
Member since Dec 2009
21894 posts
Posted on 7/25/17 at 10:17 am to
quote:

if you really think this group of Senators is going to agree on anything related to the healthcare bill in the span of 2 days.


If you think the moderate Republicans won't cave, you've literally not paid attention over the last 7 years.

They. Always. Cave.
Posted by The Spleen
Member since Dec 2010
38865 posts
Posted on 7/25/17 at 10:18 am to
quote:

Your chart is stupid and pointless



No, it's not. Jake88 seems to be under the impression there was no debate in the passing of Obamacare. The chart shows the process that was taken in the Senate.

And yes, I'm fully aware today's vote is simply a MTP vote. Even a handful of Republican Senators have said they have no idea what they're voting to proceed on as they haven't seen a bill. This is not standard procedure despite your efforts to cast yourself as the smartest person in the room. Yes, I know that once the MTP is approved it can then go to debate and mark up, but there still needs to be an actual bill to get to that point, and as of last night there still isn't a bill available to consider whether it is appropriate to proceed. This is not standard process.

Save your sanctimony for those that think Obamacare was actually written and passed behind closed doors. And that's not a defense of Obamacare. There a glaring problems with it.
Posted by LSU Patrick
Member since Jan 2009
73492 posts
Posted on 7/25/17 at 10:18 am to
Yep. Just the establishment trying to force a handful of principled conservatives to vote for a bill that fricks the people. Same old shite.
Posted by BamaAtl
South of North
Member since Dec 2009
21894 posts
Posted on 7/25/17 at 10:21 am to
quote:

Just the establishment trying to force a handful of principled conservatives to vote for a bill that fricks the people


The "principled conservatives" want to vote on a bill that fricks 32M Americans out of health insurance.

The "establishment" bill only fricks 22M.

Yay?
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
126962 posts
Posted on 7/25/17 at 10:24 am to
quote:

The "principled conservatives" want to vote on a bill that fricks 32M Americans out of health insurance.

The "establishment" bill only fricks 22M.

Why do you believe that other people (taxpayers) should provide health insurance to deadbeats?
Posted by HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
Member since Feb 2017
12458 posts
Posted on 7/25/17 at 10:25 am to
quote:

There is no law preventing insurance from being sold across state lines.

Trumpkins fall for that as a the magic bullet. They must love being duped.




Again you make things up simply to insult other people. NO ONE to my knowledge has said that it is currently illegal to sell health insurance across state lines. In fact the ACA itself allows states to set up a cooperative agreement with the National Association of Insurance Commissioners to develop standards for policies. The problem is that that section was never enacted, so there were no set standards and so insurance companies currently find it too much trouble to sell health insurance across state lines.

Also, of course another major problem with the ACA is Pelosi was right when she said "we have to pass the bill to know what's in it" because the bill itself allows the Secretary of Health and Human Services to set so many rules and regulations him or herself that Congress had no idea what they were going to do once they had the power to do it.

LINK /

So, of course it is legal to sell across state lines, it is also impossible because of the government regulations involved.
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35236 posts
Posted on 7/25/17 at 10:29 am to
quote:

NO ONE to my knowledge has said that it is currently illegal to sell health insurance across state lines.
I can't speak of the legality, but only handful of states make it feasible to sell across state lines. Again, whether that's a legal or practical issue is irrelevant to the potential benefits that are restricted by government.
Posted by tilco
Spanish Fort, AL
Member since Nov 2013
13476 posts
Posted on 7/25/17 at 10:29 am to
I don't care who controls what or what is legal. BCBS has an absolute monopoly in Alabama and it is fricking bullshite. It needs to be corrected.
Posted by Hawkeye95
Member since Dec 2013
20293 posts
Posted on 7/25/17 at 10:29 am to
quote:

Why is it a "clownshow?"

b.c they have no pass to a realistic yes? It is all just theater, and not particularly interesting theater.

I would love to see a few dems vote for 2015 R&R, so it passes and watch republicans shite a brick.
Posted by HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
Member since Feb 2017
12458 posts
Posted on 7/25/17 at 10:33 am to
quote:

I can't speak of the legality, but only handful of states make it feasible to sell across state lines. Again, whether that's a legal or practical issue is irrelevant to the potential benefits that are restricted by government.




It's not illegal and frankly no state could make it illegal because that is interstate commerce which the federal government has authority over, but it IS impractical. And the ACA has a clause in it that was supposed to make it more practical, but it was never enacted.
Posted by The Spleen
Member since Dec 2010
38865 posts
Posted on 7/25/17 at 10:37 am to
quote:

I don't care who controls what or what is legal. BCBS has an absolute monopoly in Alabama and it is fricking bullshite. It needs to be corrected.



Alabama has a really high cost of entry for other insurance carriers because of its high heart disease and diabetes rate. There are some other factors, and the stranglehold BCBS has on the market does play a small part. Still, their rates are pretty reasonable when compared to other states.

Alabama is one of the states that would have greatly benefited from expanding Medicaid. The state Medicaid budget is in shambles with no sign of relief, and the injection of federal dollars would have provided a nice cushion, while also allowing better care options to rural citizens in desperate need of care. It also would have allowed BCBS to moderate their rates, and possible even open up the market to other carriers.
Posted by BamaAtl
South of North
Member since Dec 2009
21894 posts
Posted on 7/25/17 at 10:41 am to
quote:

Why do you believe that other people (taxpayers) should provide health insurance to deadbeats?


Your classification of disabled children as 'deadbeats' is weird and immoral.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422434 posts
Posted on 7/25/17 at 10:42 am to
children who were on disability already received Medicaid before the ACA passed. it's a non-issue
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
126962 posts
Posted on 7/25/17 at 10:44 am to
quote:

Your classification of disabled children as 'deadbeats' is weird and immoral.
Are you saying all of the millions you mentioned who will "get fricked" are disabled children?

Of course they are not. So you lose again.

Please answer my question: Why do you believe that other people (taxpayers) should provide health insurance to deadbeats? (And don't use a red herring to answer.)
Posted by BamaAtl
South of North
Member since Dec 2009
21894 posts
Posted on 7/25/17 at 10:47 am to
quote:

children who were on disability already received Medicaid before the ACA passed. it's a non-issue


If Medicaid becomes a block grant (as it does under AHCA and BCRA), then there will inevitably be funding gaps. Not everyone who needs Medicaid (or qualifies) will be able to be covered.
Posted by The Spleen
Member since Dec 2010
38865 posts
Posted on 7/25/17 at 10:47 am to
How are you defining a deadbeat? The GOP bill targets the expanded Medicaid. The Medicaid expansion was aimed at those that made too much money to otherwise qualify for Medicaid, and either weren't offered insurance by their employer or they couldn't afford the premiums. So, essentially the majority of these people were working. I have no problem subsidizing these people's healthcare.
This post was edited on 7/25/17 at 10:48 am
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram