Started By
Message

re: Schumer is vowing a filibuster over Gorsuch

Posted on 3/27/17 at 5:53 pm to
Posted by llfshoals
Member since Nov 2010
15381 posts
Posted on 3/27/17 at 5:53 pm to
Nuke 'em and get it over with
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
98730 posts
Posted on 3/27/17 at 5:58 pm to
Grassley need to get the nom to the floor and McConnell needs to put it to a vote. He should announce the Dems have one chance, and if they filibuster, he'll go nuclear not just for SC noms, but for EVERYTHING (including legislation).
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
57222 posts
Posted on 3/27/17 at 6:01 pm to
quote:

Republicans refusal to hold hearings for Merrick Garland has consequences, just like elections have consequences, right?
"Biden rule". Besides, do you think the purpose of congress is stick revenge to the other team? Or to do good work?
Posted by rds dc
Member since Jun 2008
19809 posts
Posted on 3/27/17 at 6:15 pm to
I really thought Dems were bluffing here but word is that Schumer is really close to having the votes. On the flip side, apparently the RINOs have green lighted the Reid Option. No one likes losing and all the grandstanding this weekend by the Dens might have rubbed some the wrong way. Talk about flipping the narrative if this happens.
Posted by Lilpickles
Member since Nov 2016
1701 posts
Posted on 3/27/17 at 6:58 pm to
F that retarded c sucker..
This post was edited on 3/27/17 at 6:59 pm
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram