Started By
Message

re: School Choice Will Lead to Higher Teacher Salaries--why do they oppose it?

Posted on 2/3/17 at 10:18 am to
Posted by Tigerdev
Member since Feb 2013
12287 posts
Posted on 2/3/17 at 10:18 am to
Umm private and catholic school teachers make way less than charter and what public used to pay in nola.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
423392 posts
Posted on 2/3/17 at 10:18 am to
quote:

it's a money grab.

and employment protection, like pretty much all licenses

groups rally to government to create barriers to entry in order to add job security and increase market value of their trade
Posted by I B Freeman
Member since Oct 2009
27843 posts
Posted on 2/3/17 at 10:19 am to
quote:

Why would there be 2 to 3 times the number of classrooms? The supply of students isn't going to increase.



Because the number of schools will increase.

Think think think.

Let's use the $500K number per 30 kids. (you understand that would be 500k/30=$16,666 per kid) Let say instead of filtering that $16,666 per kid through the bureaucracy of government we simply gave it to the kid to use at any education facility available to him.

Now you see those kids and you decided to start a little schools for you and your friends or something like that. You want twenty students. You will then have $333,333 per YEAR to start your little school. SURELY you could to that.

Now that is a vary simple example but is what would happen.

Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111613 posts
Posted on 2/3/17 at 10:20 am to
It will not increase average salaries in my opinion. It will increase the ceiling quite a bit for good teachers and lower the floor for not so good teachers.
Posted by AUbagman
LA
Member since Jun 2014
10573 posts
Posted on 2/3/17 at 10:21 am to
Because most of them suck at their job, and they know it. And I doubt it will raise wages, but create a more rewarding work environment that acknowledges the best.
This post was edited on 2/3/17 at 10:24 am
Posted by I B Freeman
Member since Oct 2009
27843 posts
Posted on 2/3/17 at 10:21 am to
quote:

Umm private and catholic school teachers make way less than charter and what public used to pay in nola.



They do but not the charter schools that are getting funding close to the public school funding per student.

Catholic school tuition is no where close to the amount of money that the government spends per pupil. Not even half in most instances.



Posted by Tigerdev
Member since Feb 2013
12287 posts
Posted on 2/3/17 at 10:25 am to
Yea.. Well when i went to catholic school in nola they had PE coaches teaching history and science classes.
Private schools are not inherently better. You get what you pay for in that case.
Posted by Wtodd
Tampa, FL
Member since Oct 2013
67497 posts
Posted on 2/3/17 at 10:26 am to
Dems hate school choice bc they want poor urban folks to stay on the economic plantation and learn bullshite leftist agenda shite in school.
Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
50376 posts
Posted on 2/3/17 at 10:27 am to
quote:

SlowFlowPro


I'm curious in a very non contentious way... Do you think there should be no licensing for teachers?

This is my 3rd year teaching without a license. I'll have a master's next month and will become eligible for certification, but still. Teaching is mostly on the job training, imo. I don't even know if a bachelor's is necessary to be honest. Maturity, patience, and a desire to learn are really the most important qualities of a teacher.
This post was edited on 2/3/17 at 10:28 am
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
423392 posts
Posted on 2/3/17 at 10:28 am to
i mean i don't believe in licensing (even for lawyers) generally in my fantasy land

but in reality, it should be based either off of education (if you have e masters in an area, you get to teach that area) or an objective standard (if you can pass the Praxis 2 in that area, you can automatically teach)
Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
50376 posts
Posted on 2/3/17 at 10:30 am to
I agree. Too bad that likely will never happen.
edit: I think having a master's in education AND passing the praxis does make someone eligible for certification in LA.
This post was edited on 2/3/17 at 10:32 am
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35242 posts
Posted on 2/3/17 at 10:30 am to
quote:

Because the number of schools will increase.

Think think think.
But the supply is static, and the barriers (teachers, accreditation, buildings and space) would limit this to some degree.

And if there are fewer students per school, and certain resources (building and maintenance costs) are stable, then it's aszz profitable investment.
Posted by Numberwang
Bike City, USA
Member since Feb 2012
13163 posts
Posted on 2/3/17 at 10:31 am to
quote:

It will allow people to self-segregate even more. Not that I disagree with school choice, but those are the reasons.


Freedom of association? For AMERICANS?

We must stop this.
Posted by 31TIGERS
Mike’s habitat
Member since Dec 2004
7219 posts
Posted on 2/3/17 at 10:31 am to
quote:

power of the union and not the interest of their dues paying members?We know their interest is not education quality.




quote:

Because the incompetent will be weeded out.


//////////////////////THREAD!!
This post was edited on 2/3/17 at 10:33 am
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
423392 posts
Posted on 2/3/17 at 10:31 am to
the unions would never allow it
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
112739 posts
Posted on 2/3/17 at 10:35 am to
the "course work" that i knew was being done by education majors was a joke. the certification racket is there to protect the under qualified people going into teaching. frick having a history major teaching history or a biology major teaching biology, here's Kaylee Educationmajor to do both.
Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
50376 posts
Posted on 2/3/17 at 10:35 am to
I don't hate unions. Charter schools are pretty much plantations because they aren't required to give teachers breaks or support.

Posted by 31TIGERS
Mike’s habitat
Member since Dec 2004
7219 posts
Posted on 2/3/17 at 10:37 am to
quote:

Everyone will leave bad schools in bad neighborhood abandoned, and nicer schools in nicer parts of town will grow nicer.

It will allow people to self-segregate even more.


I agree. So where's the problem with that?

(No directing that at you, Eli. Just speaking in general terms)
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
423392 posts
Posted on 2/3/17 at 10:40 am to
yeah i have a ton of respect for teachers. my mom is a teacher as are most of her close friends. i had some great teachers who really did help educate me. and teachers get unfairly blamed for trying to save schools filled with students who will never become educated due to outside factors

but

the education major is kind of a joke and often a fallback. it's like construction management for engineeers
Posted by WHS
walker LA.
Member since Feb 2006
3122 posts
Posted on 2/3/17 at 10:40 am to
quote:

Everyone will leave bad schools in bad neighborhood abandoned, and nicer schools in nicer parts of town will grow nicer. It will allow people to self-segregate even more. Not that I disagree with school choice, but those are the reasons.


As soon as this happens (because its already happening in my neck of the woods) the government will step in and desegregate the schools. This is happening in the Tangipahoa parish where I teach in. Our schools have developed like this: The city schools are mostly AA and are failing and the rural schools are mostly white and are better. So what they do is allow minorities to go to what ever they school they want. This is call migrant to minority.

In return what will happen with school choice, when the rich white schools do well and the public mostly AA schools Fail the government will step in and allow the minority students go to the rich white school for free (vouchers) and desegregate it.

This is already happening at the school I teach at. we are getting more and more AA students because of the ethnicity of our school and some are even done by court order. In return, our scores are dropping more and more every year. And its not the AA student who are in our school zone that are performing bad on their scores, its the ones being shipped in who are used to a school culture that doesn't breed success.

The student that this will hurt the worst is the poor non minority student who want have the choice to go to the "good school" because he or she is neither a minority or rich.

end rant
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram