Started By
Message

re: S. Carolina voids conviction of 14 year old accused murderer

Posted on 12/18/14 at 11:54 am to
Posted by REG861
Ocelot, Iowa
Member since Oct 2011
36407 posts
Posted on 12/18/14 at 11:54 am to
quote:


Hook us up with a first-hand account of how this went down.

You were there, right?


Here, read this. It does a much better job of explaining the bullshite that went into this execution than I could hope to.

LINK

And for the record, I study criminal justice. I'm familiar with how confessions are obtained. I've studied the West Memphis 3 case assiduously. There's a pretty easy procedure for gathering a false confession, especially when the suspect is a juvenile or mentally handicapped.
This post was edited on 12/18/14 at 12:01 pm
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
98669 posts
Posted on 12/18/14 at 12:11 pm to
quote:

Oh, and a 14 year old black kid didn't face bias in Jim Crow South Carolina?


Jesus Christ! You're "logical" leaps are epic. Where the Hell did I ever say, or even imply that?
Posted by uway
Member since Sep 2004
33109 posts
Posted on 12/18/14 at 12:13 pm to
quote:

Posted by Sid in Lakeshore It is unfortunate that this 14 year old was executed and also that the actual perpetrator likely got off. But this did happen 70 years ago. We all know that this would not happen today.


So we can agree that people who claim black oppression is ancient history are wrong?
This post was edited on 12/18/14 at 12:14 pm
Posted by REG861
Ocelot, Iowa
Member since Oct 2011
36407 posts
Posted on 12/18/14 at 12:13 pm to
quote:



Jesus Christ! You're "logical" leaps are epic. Where the Hell did I ever say, or even imply that?



You're giving an awful lot of deference in this situation to a Jim Crow government. But for the sake of healthy argument, please just read the link I provided to Navy a few posts up. It spells it all out. This 'case' was obscene in all aspects.
Posted by Sid in Lakeshore
Member since Oct 2008
41956 posts
Posted on 12/18/14 at 12:27 pm to
quote:

Hook us up with a first-hand account of how this went down.

You were there, right?



stupid.
Posted by Sid in Lakeshore
Member since Oct 2008
41956 posts
Posted on 12/18/14 at 12:30 pm to
quote:

uway


quote:

people who claim black oppression is ancient history


I'm going to need a link to anyone claiming that black oppression is "Ancient History". Certainly it is part of our history, not sure it continues today to the extent that the race baiters would have us believe.

Posted by sugar71
NOLA
Member since Jun 2012
9967 posts
Posted on 12/18/14 at 12:41 pm to
quote:

And for the record, I study criminal justice. I'm familiar with how confessions are obtained. I've studied the West Memphis 3 case assiduously. There's a pretty easy procedure for gathering a false confession, especially when the suspect is a juvenile or mentally handicapped.


The 5 kids who did about 15 years in the Central Park Jogger rape were convicted based upon confessions although there was no DNA evidence linking them. The DNA was eventually linked to a convicted rapist who confessed to raping the woman alone..

The Dixmoor 5 in Chicago.


False 'confessions' happen all the time. I can wrap my mind around racism or the 'any old Negro will do' convictions , but the West Memphis 3 I can not understand. Paranoid Accusations of witchcraft , devil worshipping,etc... is mindboggling.
This post was edited on 12/18/14 at 12:44 pm
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
98669 posts
Posted on 12/18/14 at 12:48 pm to
The Grio...you will pardon me if I don't yield to this source.

You may study criminal justice, and that's fine. I am a lawyer, and have a healthy dose of skepticism (some would say cynicism) for both sides of the CJ system.

The prosecution in this case, and the jury, apparently relied upon a confession that, based on the state of the constitutional law at the time, was validly obtained (there was no Miranda at that time).

That said, there certainly appears to be a whole lot of problems with this, which is why the judge tossed the conviction on process grounds.
Posted by REG861
Ocelot, Iowa
Member since Oct 2011
36407 posts
Posted on 12/18/14 at 12:53 pm to
quote:

The Grio...you will pardon me if I don't yield to this source.


There is nothing stopping you from googling George Stinney's name and finding plenty of sources which meet your criteria. You wont find a single one that makes this 'trial' and execution look good.

quote:


That said, there certainly appears to be a whole lot of problems with this, which is why the judge tossed the conviction on process grounds.


Why that is so hard for people to admit, I don't know (and that is not meant as a swipe at you).

Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 12/18/14 at 1:02 pm to
quote:





I generally agree with all of this, which I should throw out there before I get called a SJW. It's just pitiful that people on this website have such a hard time admitting to #1 and 2.



everyone agrees with 1 & 2, not everyone agrees that it was some evil empire or fricking terrorist state as portrayed...this nation has perhaps the least violent history...humans are violent, there are wars, injustices, every society has had them or does have them

but I had a german woman staying at my mothers house equate the holocaust with jim crow...are you fricking serious? Nothing even comparable to the history of violence in Europe.



Posted by idlewatcher
County Jail
Member since Jan 2012
79025 posts
Posted on 12/18/14 at 1:21 pm to
The guy pulling the switch had to have felt some guilt putting a 14 year old in that chair.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
98669 posts
Posted on 12/18/14 at 1:23 pm to
quote:

Why that is so hard for people to admit, I don't know (and that is not meant as a swipe at you).


1) A lot of people are very ignorant of American History. Racial discrimination and Jim Crow may be in their history books, but whether it is actually taught (and how it is taught [completely benign versus Holocaust]) is another issue.

2) Even more people are completely ignorant of the justice system (civil or criminal). The vast majority will never step foot in a courtroom as a party or an accused. All they know is what they see on TV, or what they "hear about" from other sources. People that actually do this for a living know that there's not a whole lot of accuracy there.

3) There is (at least among many in the population) an inherent trust in the justice system because, for the most part, it actually works. The fact that I say it "works" does not mean that the outcomes are always what "the public" wants or would like.

For all of the wailing and gnashing of teeth, as to the LAW, the GJ decision in the Wilson case was correct. I cannot speak to Garner, because I don't know what evidence was presented; however, if the only charges that were being considered required INTENT, then that GJ's decision was correct.

How is this any different from when "bad guys" get off on "technicalities" or because the prosecution did not carry its burden of proof? Yes, in those instances there is a trial (but, so was the Zimmerman case, and if one paid attention at all to that trial, you would know that the defense of justification was proved by the facts/evidence [GZ had a reasonable fear of death, or grave bodily harm]).
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
33403 posts
Posted on 12/18/14 at 1:43 pm to
quote:

have a healthy dose of skepticism (some would say cynicism) for both sides of the CJ system.


You sure seem to be awfully credulous of the state's "case" in this instance when any and all signs point to there being close to a 0% chance that this little kid had even close to a fair trial.

quote:

The prosecution in this case, and the jury, apparently relied upon a confession that, based on the state of the constitutional law at the time, was validly obtained (there was no Miranda at that time).


A fine-sounding statement...when the "state laws" we are talking about from that time period intentionally and violently made blacks second class citizens.

Posted by JuiceTerry
Roond the Scheme
Member since Apr 2013
40868 posts
Posted on 12/18/14 at 1:45 pm to
Slavery was like a hundred years ago! Why can't people understand that?!
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
98669 posts
Posted on 12/18/14 at 1:48 pm to
quote:

You sure seem to be awfully credulous of the state's "case" in this instance when any and all signs point to there being close to a 0% chance that this little kid had even close to a fair trial.


I don't know whether he did, or didn't, as there does not appear to be any actual record. Hence, the judge tossed the case, as she should have.

quote:

A fine-sounding statement...when the "state laws" we are talking about from that time period intentionally and violently made blacks second class citizens.


Stop trying to be an a-hole. While I know you want it to be true, a jury verdict in a criminal trial of a black person in the South during the Jim Crow era is not automatically wrong.
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 12/18/14 at 1:54 pm to
quote:

The guy pulling the switch had to have felt some guilt putting a 14 year old in that chair
no, probably most people really thought he killed them...that's the most pitiful part of the whole thing.
Posted by Holden Caulfield
Hanging with J.D.
Member since May 2008
8308 posts
Posted on 12/18/14 at 1:54 pm to
I will never support capital punishment in any case.
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 12/18/14 at 2:00 pm to
quote:

I will never support capital punishment in any case.


pretty much, but I it's easy for me to say when I haven't had the misfortune of having someone I love taken from me in such an awful manner.

If your college age daughter was kidnapped, raped, strangled, her corpse defiled numerous times, her head removed, etc...how would you feel?

what if your infant was raped, murdered, etc. died alone and scared...and in pain.

it's easy for us to say. if it is 100%, no question...fry them (but you know the standard will not be met and miscarriage of justices will occur)

so yeah, I'm against the death penalty, but mostly because I'm fortunate
This post was edited on 12/18/14 at 2:02 pm
Posted by ballscaster
Member since Jun 2013
26861 posts
Posted on 12/18/14 at 2:03 pm to
quote:

Are you privy to new evidence that shows that Stinney was not guilty?

No, but we are all privy to evidence that shows that Stinney was murdered by the state.
Posted by Holden Caulfield
Hanging with J.D.
Member since May 2008
8308 posts
Posted on 12/18/14 at 2:11 pm to
quote:

but I it's easy for me to say when I haven't had the misfortune of having someone I love taken from me in such an awful manner.

You're absolutely right. I often wonder if my opposition towards capital punishment would hold up if someone dear to me was murdered. Hope I never discover the answer.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram