- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 1/11/17 at 7:31 pm to gthog61
You've performed your own independent investigation of this matter and concluded it to be "lies". I'm sure you did a fine job in the 12 hours since you first learned of the allegations. Bravo, but I'll wait until someone with an ounce of sense weighs in on it after an appropriate due diligence.
Posted on 1/11/17 at 7:43 pm to Navytiger74
quote:The difference being Edward Snowden exposed illegal activity by our government.
He's right. Just wish the 28 shitheads who upvoted you felt the same way about Chelsea bitchass Manning and that fricking Edward Snowden.
Hypocrites.
Posted on 1/11/17 at 7:44 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
quote:Right.
The difference being Edward Snowden exposed illegal activity by our government.
Posted on 1/11/17 at 7:48 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
quote:
The difference being Edward Snowden exposed illegal activity by our government.
And a ton of other totally unrelated shite
Posted on 1/11/17 at 7:49 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
quote:
The difference being Edward Snowden exposed illegal activity by our government.
Which absolves him of nothing.
Posted on 1/11/17 at 7:54 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
I wouldn't say it absolves him of nothing.
I'd say it doesn't absolve him of everything.
I'd say it doesn't absolve him of everything.
Posted on 1/11/17 at 7:57 pm to the808bass
quote:
I wouldn't say it absolves him of nothing.
I would.
He might get some credit because some of the information was valuable, but it doesn't change what he did.
Posted on 1/11/17 at 7:57 pm to Sao
quote:
But Assange should get a medal.
God I love the new America.
The IC is leaking American intel
Assange posted emails from the DNC, and a dim political operative
Even an idiot like you can see the natl security implications between the 2
Posted on 1/11/17 at 8:23 pm to Sao
quote:
But Assange should get a medal.
God I love the new America.
Please explain where Assange had a duty to protect the secrets of the US Government, much less the DNC. What oaths and loyalties has he betrayed?
This post was edited on 1/11/17 at 8:24 pm
Posted on 1/11/17 at 8:36 pm to joshnorris14
quote:
Rand Paul: Intelligence report leakers should be in jail
Cool. So when is McCain getting arrested?
Posted on 1/11/17 at 8:38 pm to Navytiger74
quote:
Just wish the 28 shitheads who upvoted you felt the same way about Chelsea bitchass Manning and that fricking Edward Snowden.
You're going to get fricking triggered upset sometime before inauguration.
Obama is going to pardon Manning. And you are going to fricking melt when it happens.
Posted on 1/11/17 at 8:39 pm to joshnorris14
Like me some Rand
Posted on 1/11/17 at 8:42 pm to joshnorris14
quote:
John McCain
I'm sure McCain is up to his neck in corruption anyway. But this one stinks.
Posted on 1/11/17 at 8:51 pm to DyeHardDylan
I don't have any problem with them publishing it. The press has supposedly had this since Oct trying to vet it but found nothing. They only put it out now because it got attached to an IC report.
That is the real question. Why would IC attach it as unfounded and then leak to the press they attached it.
The press spin is...IC used it, must have legs, but we can't verify.
It's a hit job on the pres elect by the IC and the MSM.
Trump was right...this is like nazi Germany.
This is no diff if some guy sent them a memo saying they knew Michelle o was a man and IC attached to a report and told the press it was on IC report but couldn't be verified.
That is the real question. Why would IC attach it as unfounded and then leak to the press they attached it.
The press spin is...IC used it, must have legs, but we can't verify.
It's a hit job on the pres elect by the IC and the MSM.
Trump was right...this is like nazi Germany.
This is no diff if some guy sent them a memo saying they knew Michelle o was a man and IC attached to a report and told the press it was on IC report but couldn't be verified.
Posted on 1/11/17 at 9:29 pm to Navytiger74
Navy tiger did Snowden not expose that the government was breaking the law? I would possibly agree about manning but frick you for saying Snowden should goto jail. And if the NSA would have made the correct choice on the software program they were going to use to track that kind of stuff then they wouldn't have been violating the constitution and would have been alerted the second Snowden took the info. frick them and the whole government especially the IC and constitution violating shitheads. They made the wrong choice, broke the law, were told by Snowden they were breaking the law and then were to stupid to know he took the info. They can all burn in hell.
And just so we are clear, what you are saying is the government can do whatever it wants as long as they say it's classified, correct? Because what you are saying is if anybody alerts the media then they should go to jail. Go against the regime and go to jail correct?
And just so we are clear, what you are saying is the government can do whatever it wants as long as they say it's classified, correct? Because what you are saying is if anybody alerts the media then they should go to jail. Go against the regime and go to jail correct?
Posted on 1/11/17 at 9:45 pm to lsu777
Snowden absolutely should be in jail. The government's actions don't excuse his.
Posted on 1/11/17 at 9:47 pm to joshnorris14
Why should they be in jail? Allegedly there is no intelligence report. Remember, it's fake.
This post was edited on 1/11/17 at 9:51 pm
Posted on 1/11/17 at 9:52 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
So you aren't allowed to let the American people know their government is breaking the law because it's classified? So you are ok with the government doing whatever they want as long as it's classified? That is exactly what you are saying. I think you may need to think about this a little more and do a tad more research, because frankly you are wrong and no offense but a complete and utter shitty American for having this mind set.
Look if he was just leaking classified documents, I get it. But he went to his supervisors multiple times, they failed to act and continued to break the law. He has an oath to protect the constitution against anybody foreign or domestic. They broke the law, he let the American people know, period.
Bottom line is the IC screwed up on the software program they chose due to politics. They made the bed they can sleep in it.
Look if he was just leaking classified documents, I get it. But he went to his supervisors multiple times, they failed to act and continued to break the law. He has an oath to protect the constitution against anybody foreign or domestic. They broke the law, he let the American people know, period.
Bottom line is the IC screwed up on the software program they chose due to politics. They made the bed they can sleep in it.
Posted on 1/11/17 at 9:57 pm to lsu777
quote:
That is exactly what you are saying.
No it isn't. You're making a lot of assumptions. You're also pretending Snowden didn't do a lot more than he did.
quote:
I think you may need to think about this a little more and do a tad more research, because frankly you are wrong and no offense but a complete and utter shitty American for having this mind set.
I think you're talking out of your arse because you saw a movie and read a wiki or two. Now that we have our thoughts out there, let's discuss the topic, preferably with accurate information.
I should also point out that it's very likely that I have access to and have read a lot more on this than you ever will.
Page 3 of 4
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News